Over the past decade "artificial intelligence" has emerged as a new branding for mass surveillance in response to the scrutiny of the Snowden disclosures, explains @yardenkatz.
Until we dismantle the carceral state, research naming the intersectional biases of AI will just help carceral tools more powerful.
Face recognition AI might be bad at identifying Black women, but do we really want police facial recognition to do that better?
Even "privacy" and "AI ethics" advocacy nonprofits aren't naming the broader prison-industrial complex, and they've bought into companies like Microsoft pulling PR stunts around AI regulation, helping them outmeneuver competitors.
Craig Roberts from @stoplapdspying: “If you believe the lies that science is objective and that the police state is on your side, then you will be willing to sacrifice all your human rights. We organize against these ideas.”
Craig from @stoplapdspying warns that we, the “other,” will be the guinea pigs AI is tested on, and the justice system will be one of the first places for this. White scientists are building tools to replace racist human bias with racist artificial bias.
Asked if AI could be liberatory, @yardenkatz warns that we shouldn’t think of AI as a “tool” but as a set of ideologies, developed through history. Asking for “decolonial AI” is like “decolonial capitalism.“
Corporations like Microsoft love love love theorists talking about “abolitionist AI” and “decolonial AI” because it helps legitimize their ideology without naming, for example, Microsoft supplying the Israeli police and destructive agri-businesses, explains @yardenkatz.
A lot of the nonprofits “organizing” tech workers or researching AI ethics might well be fronts for corporations. We don’t know who is funding them. And they have no community they’re accountable to or work within. They just traffic in writing reports and generating media buzz.
Khadijah @UpFromTheCracks: "Our communities need to understand how these technological systems are reproducing ideologies of surveillance and social control."
Khadijah @UpFromTheCracks on the algorithmic policing zones that Stop LAPD Spying uncovered: "If there was a brick and mortar wall around Skid Row, people would riot. But with these algorithms, we just don't see the wall." stoplapdspying.medium.com/the-algorithmi…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Two law professors just wrote this LA Times op-ed proposing various police reforms.
Who asked for these? This is another example of reform professionals offering prescriptions to strengthen policing with no accountability to those who will be harmed. latimes.com/opinion/story/…
The first author is @barryfriedman1. What base is he accountable to?
His sole link to LA that we're aware of is @LAPoliceFdtn paying him $18,000 to help sanitize and legitimize LAPD's body cam surveillance. You would think an op-ed about policing might mention this payment.
The op-ed’s main proposal is legislation standardizing police use of force, probably the ALI model bill @barryfriedman1 wrote.
Well, California two years ago enacted a bill that ALI claims is based on this model. Police here then killed more people in 2020 than 2019 and 2018.
THREAD: You might have heard LAPD claim that their budget was cut by $150 million this summer. That’s a lie. They’re playing games with numbers. We're here to demystify and defund LAPD's budget, which is billions of dollars spent to stalk and brutalize our people.
LAPD got $1.733 billion in 2019-2020 and $1.721 for 2020-21. That means their funding was reduced by only $12 million. The $150 million number that police keep throwing around is the difference from their budget REQUEST (always a high number), not from any actual city budget.
Let’s use an analogy. Suppose LAPD requested $120 last year and we gave them $100. Then suppose they requested $120 again and we gave them $95. That’s a $5 reduction, but LAPD wants to call it a $25 reduction. That’s what their $150 million number is like.
Thread (3 of 7)
July 2018 @lapdcommission holds first ever public hearing on Data Driven Policing – Community shows up in force and demands the dismantlement of LASER & Predpol and demands audit: latimes.com/local/lanow/la…
1/ The City Council votes tomorrow on accepting over $425,000 in funds related to the Department of Homeland Security’s “Countering Violent Extremism” (CVE) program.
Here's why we are talking about CVE and demanding that the City Council keep #CVA out of Los Angeles!
2/ “Countering Violent Extremism” or CVE is an Islamophobic program created by the Department of Homeland Security to justify increased surveillance of Muslim communities, and therefore increase criminalization.
3/ CVE infiltrates Muslim communities disguised as “mental health support” and “social services” through K-12 school programs and partnerships with universities, organizations, and mosques/religious institutions.