Two law professors just wrote this LA Times op-ed proposing various police reforms.
Who asked for these? This is another example of reform professionals offering prescriptions to strengthen policing with no accountability to those who will be harmed. latimes.com/opinion/story/…
The first author is @barryfriedman1. What base is he accountable to?
His sole link to LA that we're aware of is @LAPoliceFdtn paying him $18,000 to help sanitize and legitimize LAPD's body cam surveillance. You would think an op-ed about policing might mention this payment.
The op-ed’s main proposal is legislation standardizing police use of force, probably the ALI model bill @barryfriedman1 wrote.
Well, California two years ago enacted a bill that ALI claims is based on this model. Police here then killed more people in 2020 than 2019 and 2018.
Does @barryfriedman1's op-ed say if these laws actually reduce police killings? Of course not.
Police reformers never face accountability for their choices. They just move on and collect more checks, often from police hiring them as shock absorbers to deflect our criticism.
Why do reformers keep thinking this shit will work? Reform is a utopian fantasy. Policing’s purpose is to dominate and harm. Its roots are enslavement and imperialism. It will always be harmful.
The op-ed concludes by asking the feds to take "more responsibility" in improving local policing. Since @barryfriedman1 and @rharmonlaw are police reform scholars, we ask: is there ANY history of federal intervention NOT directing more resources and power to police? Ever?
Scholars including Naomi Murakawa and Elizabeth Hinton have documented the federal government’s decades-long role in expanding the power and resources of local police, often in the name of "reform."
When will reformers learn?
There is no such thing as good policing. Our people do not want to be policed.
Black and brown people braved batons and tear gas last summer to demand that cities defund police and invest in our lives. Yet reform professionals keep claiming we want "better” policing. WE DON'T.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Over the past decade "artificial intelligence" has emerged as a new branding for mass surveillance in response to the scrutiny of the Snowden disclosures, explains @yardenkatz.
Until we dismantle the carceral state, research naming the intersectional biases of AI will just help carceral tools more powerful.
Face recognition AI might be bad at identifying Black women, but do we really want police facial recognition to do that better?
THREAD: You might have heard LAPD claim that their budget was cut by $150 million this summer. That’s a lie. They’re playing games with numbers. We're here to demystify and defund LAPD's budget, which is billions of dollars spent to stalk and brutalize our people.
LAPD got $1.733 billion in 2019-2020 and $1.721 for 2020-21. That means their funding was reduced by only $12 million. The $150 million number that police keep throwing around is the difference from their budget REQUEST (always a high number), not from any actual city budget.
Let’s use an analogy. Suppose LAPD requested $120 last year and we gave them $100. Then suppose they requested $120 again and we gave them $95. That’s a $5 reduction, but LAPD wants to call it a $25 reduction. That’s what their $150 million number is like.
Thread (3 of 7)
July 2018 @lapdcommission holds first ever public hearing on Data Driven Policing – Community shows up in force and demands the dismantlement of LASER & Predpol and demands audit: latimes.com/local/lanow/la…
1/ The City Council votes tomorrow on accepting over $425,000 in funds related to the Department of Homeland Security’s “Countering Violent Extremism” (CVE) program.
Here's why we are talking about CVE and demanding that the City Council keep #CVA out of Los Angeles!
2/ “Countering Violent Extremism” or CVE is an Islamophobic program created by the Department of Homeland Security to justify increased surveillance of Muslim communities, and therefore increase criminalization.
3/ CVE infiltrates Muslim communities disguised as “mental health support” and “social services” through K-12 school programs and partnerships with universities, organizations, and mosques/religious institutions.