Rush Limbaugh was one of the most influential political figures of the last thirty years as well as the master of a medium in a way few figures in history can claim. Yet elites on right and left seemed continuously committed to underplaying his talent and influence.
One of the more obvious but powerful moves on the part of President Trump—the sort of thing most Republican leaders would never do—was to recognize Limbaugh. This drove the uniparty establishment crazy of course but it was right and just. Limbaugh was the rarest of talents. RIP.
Rush was the actual “conservative movement” for a long time, putting into words what millions felt and thought of as common sense. Many intellectual types and thinktanks and other leaders were carried along by him without even realizing it.
Believe it or not, I don't really care about media figures (or get a thrill from pols or fancy institutions). People=people. And words are words, whether they are in lights or not. But the exception for me was when Rush mentioned something I wrote on air:
Actually melted my cold heart a little bit (again, can't adequately convey how hardened I am against fame/authorities/name-in-lights with words) b/c for me like so many others Rush's radio persona was such a personal presence/influence from time when my brain was full of mush on.
What is sad but true is how the tightening oligarchy cannot even acknowledge his historic relation to his medium: there was no one better at it, ever. How many men can say they single-handedly resurrected an entire obsolescing medium, which is what Rush did for AM "talk" radio?
Finally, as I say above, radio is intensely personal. And this is why the death of the greatest radio man in history is personal for tens of millions of Americans. They are not well served by a media & a vicious elite that scorns them and urges half the nation to hate the other.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yea this is a rare extreme weather event, but winter storm is obviously exposing flaws in Texas grid.
Given the few facts authorities/ energy companies are releasing millions will be w/o power throughout the week.
This has real political legs, & spin battle has already begun:
God knows what things will look like at end of week.
Battle unfolds 2 ways: Ds demand TX get back on national grid/attack old R energy policy/mock secession, etc
Rs will say this is due to green insanity. But not likely as simple as frozen windmills, although those didn’t help:
Galaxy brain solution is Rs must not only reject green nonsense but demand we build back better. Need to think about Musk-level mega-projects for self-sustaining grid that leads world without ideological hindrances in any direction.
The @ginacarano fiasco runs deep. Very deep. What’s obscured by the borg (in part b/c old televisual peeps trying to double down & not tell talent what the true #s are) is that she is an underrated and in truth extremely popular star of most watched FAMILY entertainment show.
She checks all the supposed check boxes for the identity politics bullshit crowd in terms of women and feminist hollow tropes (beautiful but relatable and kick ass) but doesn’t fit or agree with their narrative.
And she was canceled for using their own overused tropes that she used far more prudently than they all do—including the mostly masked primary star of the show she was on...
The crazy thing about living through a regime change like this one is the combination of *denial* along with the increasing explicit justifications for oppression. The history books don’t tell you about all the people in willful denial as things escalated—who let it happen.
What keeps happening, over and over, are incidents with obvious parallels that reveal the nature of The Party now attempting to take complete control over America. To point out the obvious about it is to be fired and publicly reviled like @ginacarano.
Meanwhile, of course they can say the same about their opponents. That’s the point of all this: “we can protest & riot w/impunity—you cannot.” Only The Party can make Nazi references. Etc. But if you aren’t a member of The Party & in denial, at this point I assume it’s willful.
I don't pretend to know much about the mysteries, but it seems to me that there are two underlying and extreme premises in our debates about identity and gender, and they contradict each other, and all sides in some respect argue from both premises when it suits them.
On 1 hand, people argue as if each person is their own snowflake, w/their particular shade of whatever, hardened & solidified forever, & utterly unique, upon various spectrums or on one side or another of a binary, & they are wut they are & this cannot be changed much, if at all.
On other hand, people argue as if each person is pure potency, able to will into existence or choose whatever shade of whatever they desire to desire/become, w/no real constraints upon what they are since what they are is will/potential alone, open to infinite changes & choosing.
Political history is generally one, big cluster-F for all peoples. That used to be a big part of the point of learning it. So much of the insane and puritanical gibberish of the ongoing cultural revolution is born of deep historical ignorance, whatever it’s proponents claim.
If we wanted to go back in any history for 400 years and start assigning blame to descendants for the sins of the past...lol...the entire world would be at war. This is obvious. But, sadly, not to today’s blinkered ideologues. Who really know no history in this broader sense.
Reason it helps to study history outside one’s own is to allow one to see the traces of meta-history, or human nature and political life itself: replete as it is with similar tides and evils. We’ve robbed students of this. We’ve robbed elites of this. Now we get what we paid for.
NYT drama reads like a moronic parody TV show and I couldn’t care less in some ways. But perhaps we should care. Because while it deserves to implode this sort of work tribunal justice is now equipping itself with the power of the state.