This is understandably confusing because the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage in 2015 and banned employment discrimination against LGBTQ people last year. This gives the impression to most Americans that all discrimination is now illegal. In reality: not even most of it.
In most states, LGBTQ people are still vulnerable to discrimination in housing, credit, education, public spaces and services, federally funded programs, + jury service.
We're not just talking about the ability to buy wedding cakes, though that's bad enough. It's SO much more.
Take a look at this map.
The states in purple? Those are the only places that ban discrimination against LGBTQ people in every form.
The light purple states permit/ignore anti-LGBTQ discrimination in most areas of public life.
Gray states? Almost every area of public life.
So, an LGBTQ person living in, say, Missouri can't be discriminated against in hiring, but they can be denied housing and credit and proper jury service. LGTBQ students don't have adequate protections in public schools. This is a huge problem. It's the biggest piece of the fight.
As a trans woman, even though I can get married and serve in the military and be protected from employment discrimination, I can still be denied a place to live in these states. If I drive from Florida to NYC to L.A., I will be a second-class citizen for most of my route.
But wait, you say, didn't President Biden sign an executive order last month addressing this?
Yes, but his executive action addressed only federal law. It doesn't apply to state law. LGBTQ people are still not protected from state-level discrimination.
Protecting LGBTQ people from discrimination in every area of public life throughout the United States would require an Act of Congress.
Here's the really good news: we already have that legislation, and it's enormously popular with the public.
It's called The Equality Act, and a recent poll from @PRRIpoll found that 83 percent of Americans support it, including a clear majority of more conservative voters.
This is a massively popular bipartisan piece of legislation.
Need more good news? I got you...
The Equality Act is *really good* for the economy. A coalition of more than 335 major corporations brought together by @HRC has come out in full support of this legislation.
Need more good news
The Equality Act *already* passed the U.S. House with a strong bipartisan majority in the last term. Even a number of Republicans voted for its passage.
The only reason it didn't become law, despite clearly having enough support in the Senate, is because McConnell blocked it.
But now Democrats have control of the Senate, and the legislation will *finally* be considered. And yet, despite having some Republicans who support it, it still needs 60 votes to pass because of the filibuster (sigh, I know). So, here's what we need to do...
We need everyone to take a few moments to call both their House reps and their Senators to ensure they know that passage of the Equality Act is non-negotiable for you as a constituent.
We are *so* close to making this happen. We're right there. And we can do it.
It's really easy to contact your Reps and Senators and let them know you support this.
To Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison and any other man who needs to hear this: if you have to contextualize sexual violence against women by imagining it happening to your wife, daughter, etc. in order to appropriately act, you are very much part of the problem.
There is something so darkly disgusting beyond the pale that sexual violence needs to be rationalized this way in order to be taken seriously. There is a not-so-subtle implication that it strikes at men themselves from some perverse "property" thinking. It's honestly horrific.
This is not a "men" problem. There are countless men who don't seem to need a detailed walkthrough of the ethical illustrations of sexual violence. I refuse to believe that men are incapable of naturally getting this. You get no excuses. Period.
Whatever you may think of The Lincoln Project and their effectiveness, the simple fact remains that if the Democratic Party and progressive movement invested more in grassroots organizations already doing the work, no one would ever even perceive a need for TLP. Invest locally.
Maybe they work. Maybe they don't. I think that's even more moot than it was last week. You know what does work? The progressive grassroots organizations already doing the labor and moving the needle, even in spaces in our country that are conservative. Support them.
I think, too, that so many Democrats have this internal fear that Republicans are better at making ads. That's not true. They're better at pandering shamelessly in one of two directions: saturated patriotism or saturated racism (sometimes both). And there's no counterpoint.
This.... doesn't make sense. If they're not the fastest or best because of a young trans woman, then it would follow that the scholarship had been offered to the young trans woman. Do you have any examples of this?
Like... if your answer is that "well, they didn't recruit a young trans woman because she's trans, obviously", wouldn't that mean these experienced and obsessed recruiters would move on to the hypothetical second place cis woman?
Again: this is completely illogical.
I mean, really think this through for all of ten seconds. College recruiters know every competitor at the top level in high school. If the young woman is openly trans, they'd know that. If she beat a cis woman, they'd know that. Yet, somehow... no scholarships for anyone? C'mon.