THREAD: On doing citation tracing for a review/survey of the literature/state of the art, on the ground.
Most of you who read my blog will know I've written several posts about how we need to map relationships across authors, papers, literatures, disciplines, bodies of work.
I am collaborating on a grant proposal, and also writing a paper on subnational comparative public policy. Most of you who have followed me for a long time or have read my scholarly work will know I have also taught State and Local Government (feel free to ask for my syllabi).
I'm also doing some work on the comparative politics of subnational health policies. While not 100% new to me, I do need to refresh my knowledge of how the comparative method is applied at the subnational level (I taught Comparative Methods at the doctoral level last semester)
If I were to do citation tracing on "the subnational comparative method", I would probably go and check who is citing Richard Snyder's 2001 paper.
Well, YIKES. I don't have the time to narrow down 1055 citations.
I need to make my search narrower, choose better search terms.
So, instead of going the "run a citation tracing process on Snyder 2001" route, I am going to go for a search on "subnational policy". That is, after all, what I am going to be writing on (both the grant and the paper).
Oh, look - those three top journal articles look "juicy".
I have several blog posts that should help in this process.
4. Synthesizing different bodies of work in your literature review: The Conceptual Synthesis Excel Dump (CSED) technique raulpacheco.org/2016/06/synthe…
From this preliminary search, I found a few articles that I think might be of interest for my topic ("subnational policies"), and a couple that I might use for my doctoral seminars.
You might wonder "how did he come up with the *other* Eckersley articles"?
Well, I did forward-citation-tracing. That means, I went and looked at who had cited the Eckersley paper I liked first.
By now I have anywhere between 4 and 6 articles on topics related to subnational policy. Time to read (AIC or deeper reading) and annotate/systematize.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Inicia @IsaCordu su presentación. Isabel sugiere que en el estudio de la opinión pública, utilizar métodos mixtos puede ser interesante.
.@ricartur59 presenta una diversidad de estrategias de muestreo y estratificación y los distintos métodos que se podrían utilizar para comprender la opinión pública.
THREAD: On the full-fledged process of responding to a Revise-And-Resubmit (R&R).
I have written pieces of the process, but I hadn't actually written a thread or a blog post showcasing how all my blog posts fit with one another. I teach this process when I give workshops.
So here's what I do (now), and let me share a lesson from my past lives:
DO NOT SIT ON R&Rs.
I know, they're painful and scary and sometimes we don't know if our paper will get rejected in the end.
But remember, an R&R means an OPPORTUNITY to get your paper published.
Sitting on R&Rs, leaving them for later, and not prioritizing them has gotten me fewer publications. I know this for a fact. I am not ashamed of admitting that I have sometimes felt that I will not be capable of responding to multiple (often conflicting) comments.
It's almost February 15th, 2021, which means I get to muse about planning, yearly planning, etc.
As most of you know, I'm a very systematic planner. Even in the face of COVID19, which threw every plan I had out the window. Even in the face of chronic illness, which did the same
To me, planning is a tool to maintain a semblance of control in my life. Because I know that all bets are off right now, my planning is quite relaxed, to-the-point and non-committal. Do I have to teach 2 courses this fall? Those DO go in the plan. Do I have to resubmit R&Rs?
My yearly planning process through the Everything Notebook has the advantage (for me) that I can be as ambitious or non-ambitious as I want or need.
There is stuff that MUST go in there, but there are also things that can be rescheduled/terminated. raulpacheco.org/2016/12/my-yea…
Les había prometido que si me daban medio "Like" les hacía un hilo para mi Twitter hispanoparlante sobre "cómo revisar un manuscrito al que le han dado R&R (revise-and-resubmit, o revisar-y-reenviar).
Tengo 45 minutos antes de irme a dormir, así es que, abro hilo.
Algo que no estoy seguro que se enseñe en posgrados (al menos en Iberoamérica) es que el objetivo del envío es obtener, cuando menos, un R y R (revisar y reenviar).
Cuando yo era más joven, tuve mucha suerte que me aceptaron artículos arbitrados con cambios muy menores.
Contra lo que se pudiera pensar, el tener éxito al principio de mi proceso de publicación (con aceptaciones directas y/o con cambios menores) minó mi capacidad de enfrentarme a las críticas, en ocasiones devastadoras, que me llegaron a hacer más adelante (en inglés Y en español)
Este proyecto de seminario inició hace 3 años, es un esfuerzo de profes de 3 instituciones, y me enorgullece el poder participar en la primera edición de "Historia Aplicada: Metodologías y Praxis" - Gracias a @mkbess y @profjuliette por invitarme a esta jornada, y a @CideHistoria
La Dra. Juliette Levy @profjuliette profesora de University of California Riverside, historiadora económica, y especialista en humanidades digitales. history.ucr.edu/people/juliett…
Este grupo de Doctorandos en Historia Aplicada promete ofrecernos unas discusiones muy interesantes sobre las aplicaciones de la historia a las políticas públicas, las relaciones internacionales, la ciencia política, etc.
THREAD: I was asked for references on how to use ethnographic field notes in the actual writing of a paper, and how they should be reported.
Interestingly, most of the work I've read on field notes is on "how to craft them" and "how to analyze them", not "how to report them".
On developing an ethnographic sensibility and learning how to write field notes, I’ve found books most useful.
What I want to make clear is that using excerpts from your interviews and ethnographic field notes is common in the actual writing of the ethnography.
If you are teaching ethnography, and you want to educate your students on how they can use their field notes when writing up their results/analysis/discussion sections, I believe you need to use 2 strategies first.