1/ Manifesting is postmodern spirituality. The metaphysics of discourse creates the world, but it is in the postmodern mind a force that can be harnassed through language and thought.
"Manifesting" fits perfectly into that understanding of the world...
2/ Remember the postmoderns think *everything* is entirely socially constructed and if the world is created by society using language, which means the world is built using words that exlress ideas, thoughts, ideologids, dreams, goals, and so on.
Well....
3/ That means the "world" as it's understood to be constructed is not an unintentional brute reality, but it's filled with and interwoven with thoughts, ideas, beliefs, and dreams
If you graft our natural human propensity for spirituality on to that understanding of the world...
4/ It means the world begins to look like it is infused with, or more accuratly given the spiritual spin we are looking at, the world is *ENCHANTED* with all the thoughts, ideas, dreams and beliefs of the rolling sea of social connectedness (society) that made the world...
5/ On this view, you dreams are, quite literally, out there in the world waiting to be connected with.
The world is alive in a way, it isn't an impersonal brute physical system, it is alive with the ideas, beiefs, and dreams that made it.
Here is another way to think about it:
6/ If words and language have the power to socially construct reality, then words have the power to make and transform.
Where else do we see that idea? We see it in witchcraft and magic; in the charms, incantations, and spells that magically transform both people and things...
7/ And in the enchantments and spells that turn princes into frogs, pumpkins into carriages, and make Aladdin a prince.
So magic spells and incantations have a parallel with radical social construction: in both cases words have the power to create and change reality.
8/ If you see the world as a relational entity socially constructed with the power of language, it's a small step for your natural psychological religious arcitecture to kick in and see a world that's enchanted with the magic and power of the words that socially constructed it.
9/ No conscious choice is needed. A worldview shift that sees the world as constructed with the power of language is enough. When that connects to people's natural religious impluses then in their minds the power to change reality is divorced from the world and wedded to the word
10/ It's a new religious thinking that results from mixing the postmodern worldview our natural proclivity for religion; a religious thinking where because language makes the world, language is primary amdanguage comes first.
In the beginning was the word.
11/ So it makes psefect sense that "manifesting" would be a new thing.
If the world is made of thoughts and language, the mayne you can make your own world for yourself if you have the right thoughts and say the right things.
12/
I never meant this to go this long. But here we are.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
DiAngelo does work in "whiteness studies" which run parallel to CRT amd makes use of CRT. The difference is focus. One focuses on *race* the other on whitness specifically...but they have massive overlap in terms of the underlying assumptions and worldview
This is why we get papers like this one which link the two.
Saying whitness studies and CRT are seperate is is like saying northern baptists and southern baptsits are seperate. In a sense they are, but they have nearly identical views.
This is transparent bad faith. He takes his own reading of the politics of America amd then just says "translation" to insinuate something was said that was not said.
I hope he doesn't take the same approach to scripture
If this was an even vaguely plausible reading of what was being said I would leave it. But it isn't. Ot's a deliberate attempt to paint something in the worst light and pretend it says something it does not.
1/ It says use a dictionary to define communism, but as @realchrisrufo showed in *the next tweet* kids had to simulate a Free Angela Davis rally. She's a communist. It's easy to infer the kids were primed to give a favorable definition of communism...
2/ Greg also ignores that, these *5TH GRADERS* are being taught about *checks notes* Black Communism in a unit where Angela Davis, who once said people in Soviet Gilags deserved it, is painted as nothing more then an academic and activist.
Again, these kids can barely even read.
3/ And we are supposed to pretend there's nothing to see here.
Scott attacks Denny's character. He says there is no evidence of Denny's "work ethic and ability" then says that Denny is not just wrong, but also that Denny cares more about his own power then he does about truth.
Any way you slice it those are character attacks.
note that Scott uses the term "raw ability." That means the natural intelligence to do the work. He isn't going after Denny for not being trained, or properly educated for the task. Scott is attacking Denny's intelligence.
I'm not being a jerk, I'm making my point with a sledgehammer.
Pretending differences between men and women don't exist is utterly absurd, and people keep saying it. This ACLU lawyer quite literally says "Women and girls who are trans are biological women and girls."
1/ Yesterday we found out @ginacarano was fired from Star Wars over Social Media posts
Lots of people talk about cancel culture, but so far no one has given a serious account of exactly what cancel culture is, where it comes from, and how it works
So, Cancel Culture
A Thread🧵
2/ There's a lot of confusion around cancel culture both because cancel culture is a new phenomenon, and because some people have dishonestly and cynically misused the term in order to score political points. So let's try to get clear about EXACTLY what's cancel culture is.
3/ To begin, I need to say something about "free speech."
Free Speech is not *only* a legal principle. It is that, but it isn't *just* that. Free speech is also an enlightenment liberal **VALUE**
Read that last sentence again because it's the beating heart of my thinking here.