He achieves this deception by omitting key facts regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma, 2018, including:- syriapropagandamedia.org/update-on-the-…
1) the fact that others have raised questions regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack including UK military experts, for example here on @skynews:
2) the fact that BBC producer Riam Dalati has stated in public that, based on 6 months of research, hospital scenes related to the alleged attack were beyond doubt staged:
3) @oliverkamm also makes no mention of key developments since his newspaper first attacked the working group back in April 2018. These developments include:-
4) the emergence of OPCW whistleblowers who have identified serious procedural and scientific flaws regarding the OPCW FFM investigation of the alleged Douma attack. couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
6) In fact, whistleblower testimony has been so compelling that the first Director General of the OPCW, Jose Bustani, and a number of other eminent figures have signed an open letter calling for accountability at the OPCW couragefound.org/2019/10/opcw-p…
7) Jose Bustani has also addressed the UN Security Council on this issue. And yet you will learn nothing of these facts in Kamm's article. @2ndNewMoon
8) Furthermore, in his attempt to present our work on alleged chemical weapons attacks as fringe, @oliverkamm also conceals the fact that the late Julian Perry Robinson was in communication with the working group. theguardian.com/world/2020/may…
9) Robinson, a leading world expert on chemical and biological warfare, invited working group member Paul McKeigue to present findings at the Harvard-Sussex prog. syriapropagandamedia.org/wp-content/upl…
10) Also omitted from discussion is his personal involvement in a near 3 year long smear campaign aimed at members of the working group. This article details this smear campaign and Kamm's involvement with it:- off-guardian.org/2020/10/06/the…
11) Finally, @OliverKamm also fails to inform his readers about the large volume of documentation published by @wikileaks which corroborates the OPCW whistleblowers wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/#OP… as well as Noam Chomsky's recent statement
12) In sum, to present our work on alleged chemical weapon attack as the product of unfounded 'conspiracy theory' is demonstrably false and profoundly misleading. Clearly, these are legitimate questions and it is our responsibility to address them @CapX
13) The question that should now be asked is why @oliverkamm is so determined to attack academic investigation of alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria? In doing so, he is suppressing the truth of what happened to these civilians. @BristolUni@ProfPRogers@LawDavF
14) And for the latest summing up of the OPCW issue, watch this @RollingStone interview:-
Perhaps the reason, @RichardHRBenyon, that @Dannythefink doe not mention Miller's work on alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria is precisely because it cannot be dismissed as 'conspiracy theory' @HamishDBG@BristolUni:-
1) For example, the emergence of OPCW whistleblowers identifying serious procedural and scientific flaws regarding the OPCW FFM investigation of the alleged Douma attack:- couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
@themattdimitri provides a misleading presentation of @bellingcat and highlights the problematic involvement of @CherylRofer with a known propaganda operation. The deceptive conduct of @bellingcat is made clear in their latest book:-
1) @bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by @BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW#Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission.
2) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:-
1) It includes the deployment of behavioural psychologists to facilitate the manipulation of the population through techniques including incentivization and coercion @ReicherStephen@SusanMichie
2) the use of UK military unit 77th Brigade and the direct censorship of scientists questioning government policy:- rt.com/op-ed/490110-c…@ukcolumn
Why would anyone listen to an institute established by a politician who deceived Britain into an illegal and deeply immoral war? Blair is an *extremely dangerous* political actor:-