Perhaps the reason, @richardhrbenyon, that @dannythefink doe not mention Miller's work on alleged chemical weapon attacks in Syria is precisely because it cannot be dismissed as 'conspiracy theory' @HamishDBG@BristolUni:-
1) For example, the emergence of OPCW whistleblowers identifying serious procedural and scientific flaws regarding the OPCW FFM investigation of the alleged Douma attack:- couragefound.org/2019/10/analyt…
3) Whistleblower testimony that has been so compelling that the first Director General of the OPCW, Jose Bustani, and a number of other eminent figures have signed an open letter calling for accountability at the OPCW couragefound.org/2019/10/opcw-p…
4) Bustani also testified at the UN Security Council, blocked by the US and UK, but still heard:
5) You might also note that the working group on Syria, to which Miller belongs, was in contact with the late Julian Perry Robinson, a leading world expert on chemical and biological weapons theguardian.com/world/2020/may…
6) Perry even invited one of the working group, Professor Paul McKeigue, to present our work at the Harvard-Susses Prog. on Them/Bio weapons. He had noted the smear campaign aimed at us!: syriapropagandamedia.org/wp-content/upl…
7) Dismissing the Syria work as conspiracism also makes little sense given the volume of leaked documents now available wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/#OP… *and* the recent discussion by Chomsky about the issue:-
8)Attacking Miller's work on Syria as conspiracism *does* however make sense if the aim is to smear and suppress legitimate academic inquiry. It is notable that @HamishDBG's colleague, the late le Mesurier, communicated with @oliverkamm requesting that @thetimes'keep on our case'
8) As we detail in our briefing notes, both @HamishDBG and James Le Mesurier have been directly involved in OPCW FFM operations, supplying evidence and witnesses, syriapropagandamedia.org/how-the-opcws-…
9) And it is precisely these OPCW FFM missions that are now under the spotlight because of OPCW whistleblowers, leaked documents and statements from senior OPCW officials such as this:-
10) A reasonable observation would be that there appears to be an attempt to prevent the truth from being established as to how these civilians were killed at Douma. And that the 'conspiracy theory' smear is being used to achieve that suppression of the truth.
11) And that might explain why Richard, Hamish and others have continuously tweeted crude and unsophisticated material such this over the last few years, attacking Miller and others working on Syria.
2021 and the US is illegally bombing Syria again:- That's 20 years now of the 9/11 Global 'war on terror'. Here is Tony Blair and George Bush discussing back in Autumn 2001, just after 9/11, how to take out Saddam.
1) And here they discuss the matter of when to attack Iraq, Syria and Iran.
2) And here is General Wesley Clark discussing the wide-ranging 'regime-change' war ending with Iran:-
He achieves this deception by omitting key facts regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in Douma, 2018, including:- syriapropagandamedia.org/update-on-the-…
1) the fact that others have raised questions regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack including UK military experts, for example here on @skynews:
@themattdimitri provides a misleading presentation of @bellingcat and highlights the problematic involvement of @CherylRofer with a known propaganda operation. The deceptive conduct of @bellingcat is made clear in their latest book:-
1) @bellingcat's attempt in their new book, published by @BloomsburyBooks, to coverup the @OPCW#Douma controversy, promote US and UK gov. war narratives, and whitewash fraudulent conduct within the OPCW, is an exercise in deception through omission.
2) 2000 words are devoted to the OPCW controversy regarding the alleged chemical weapon attack in #Douma, Syria in 2018 but critical material is omitted from the book. Reading it, one would never know the following:-
1) It includes the deployment of behavioural psychologists to facilitate the manipulation of the population through techniques including incentivization and coercion @ReicherStephen@SusanMichie
2) the use of UK military unit 77th Brigade and the direct censorship of scientists questioning government policy:- rt.com/op-ed/490110-c…@ukcolumn
Why would anyone listen to an institute established by a politician who deceived Britain into an illegal and deeply immoral war? Blair is an *extremely dangerous* political actor:-