1) Running refuges on the basis of gender-identity rather than sex, risks making them hostile environments for women experiencing trauma after men's violence.
Trauma informed spaces for women who have been subjected to men's violence must be single sex spaces.
2) There's a paucity of research on rates of violence of males 'who have transitioned' or 'who identify as having transitioned'.
The scant evidence available suggests male transitioners retain male pattern violent offending -there's no research on males who simply self identify.
What could possibly go wrong with mixed sex provision that isn't run by a woman-centred specialist organisation? Try this newstatesman.com/politics/2015/…
Research published in 2012 by the Equality and Human Rights Commission showed that 95% of women using women’s services preferred to receive them from a women only-organisation. equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/…
University of Suffolk - 2015 - showed that survivors of childhood sexual abuse felt most believed by Independent Sexual Violence Advocates and rated the services provided by independent specialist organisations – women run organisations – highest. uos.ac.uk/sites/default/…
Research by the Women's National Commission on Women Only services, 2010:
-99% of the respondents believe that it is important for a woman who has been sexually assaulted or has experienced any other form of violence to have the choice to access a women-only support service.
Research by the Women's National Commission on Women Only services, 2010, found (2): 79% of women said that there is still a need for independent women’s organisations even if mixed organisations and statutory bodies also provide single-sex services.
Research by WNC on Women Only Services, 2010, found(3): Respondents said they wanted women only services for these reasons "safety, empathy, trust, comfort, support, less intimidating, focus on women’s needs, shared identity, expertise, confidence, access, rapport,long-term care"
What could possibly go wrong with mixed sex provision that isn't run by a woman-centred specialist organisation? I attached the wrong article higher up the thread dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Any woman can be subjected to a man’s or men’s violence. We know that class, race, disability, sexuality, any of the differences between women, differences which are often turned in to inequalities do not provide an impenetrable barrier;
though they do present more exposure to or protection from some forms of violence.
Any woman should be able to access specialist support for women who have been subjected to sexual and domestic violence and abuse, including prostitution.
We also know that women of means may have alternatives to those services, e.g. it’s rare you find a woman in refuge, who could afford to book herself into a hotel, or who have access to friends with space. She has choices. Many women in refuges do not. Women in prison do not.
I see those trying to deprive women victim-survivors of sexual and domestic violence and abuse, including prostitution, of their legal right to single-sex services from specialist independent organisations have come out to play again.
Firstly - it is perfectly straightforward and contains no contradictions to support universal human rights AND sex based rights and protections - and in doing so to prioritise the well-being of women, particularly those who have been subjected to men's violence.
I have made no secret of my belief in the importance of single-sex services for women who've been subjected to men's violence - but don't listen to what other people say I say, read what I say myself for yourself (if you're interested). Links follow.
It’s absolutely true that the scrapping of self-ID is the work of hundreds, no, thousands of ordinary women fighting to retain rights for our sisters.
But I personally would like to say thank you to @bindelj who stood practically alone against the threat of transgender ideology
for such a long time.
Secondly to @Womans_Place_UK who took up the mantel for those of us who wanted to address the issue within the context of broader structural inequalities and whose support and sisterhood gave me determination to speak out.
Thirdly to @nia_endingVAWG’s board of trustees who gave me the permission to speak out as CEO because they recognised the threat to specialist women’s services and made the issue a strategic aim for nia; and to nia’s staff & senior management team for everything they do for women
To the women (and men) who made this happen, whether or not we agree on broader feminist or other political ideals: Thank you. thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/c…
To those with whom I share broader feminist & political ideals, but who have stayed silent on the threat of transgender ideology to women’s rights & protections: many of us will neither forget nor forgive your silence (particularly for me,those with a purported interest in MVAWG)
To people who identify as transgender and their allies, I support universal human rights, including yours.
He's a speech I gave earlier this year (remember pre-lockdown anyone?) about the importance of women only services for women and girls subjected to men's violence
On another platform this morning, a bunch of women were discussing menopause and peri-menopause, the OP was specifically about how the issue was still taboo and neglected.
Cue a younger woman turning up and proclaiming that framing menopause as a women's issue is transphobic.
I am bloody sick of this. (Of course not just for this reason).
Women were discussing a major life event for almost all women and a challenging one for many of us, and another woman (of course significantly younger), in a feminist forum, makes it about males.
Newsflash
Women talking about our bodies is not transphobic.
Males do not have periods.
Males do not experience menopause and peri-menopause.
Silencing women talking about our bodies is misogynistic.
Deflecting attention away from women talking about our bodies is patriarchal