BREAKING: the Court has granted a cost-capping order in our judicial review with @EveryDoctorUK over the award of huge PPE contracts without competition to Ayanda, Pestfix and Clandeboye. THREAD rebrand.ly/ppe-keep-fight…
In awarding the cost-capping order, the Judge seemed to agree:
“All citizens are likely to have an interest in whether or not the procurement on the part of the government is done using good governance procedures and integrity."
The Judge continued: "And therefore there is a real wider public interest that has been represented by the claimant group, which is a not-for-profit group, in bringing this challenge”
After Government said it would cost an unbelievable £1million pounds to defend the case, we asked the Court to cap our exposure to Government’s legal costs at £100k. We are a small not-for-profit that relies on crowdfunding.
After reviewing our fundraising efforts for the case so far, this is the figure we could afford. Instead, the Court has granted a cost-capping order of £250k. It means if we lose the case, we are liable to pay a quarter of a million pounds - as well our own legal costs.
Despite huge support from members of the public, generous individuals and organisations, we are still short. But we will not stop fighting. If you are in a position to donate to the legal challenge, you can do so here: crowdjustice.com/case/108millio…
Despite huge support from generous members of the public we are still short. But we will not be bullied out by costs. This case, which we are bringing alongside @EveryDoctor, is simply too important. If you are in a position to donate you can do so here: crowdjustice.com/case/108millio…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The High Court has ruled that Government has acted unlawfully by failing to disclose details of Covid-related contracts, in breach of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015 and its own guidance.
“The Secretary of State acted unlawfully by failing to comply with the Transparency Policy” and “there is now no dispute that, in a substantial number of cases, the SoS breached his legal obligation to publish Contract Award Notices within 30 days of the award of contracts.”
We'll be keeping our website updated with the key documents referred to in our barristers' - and the Government's barristers' - submissions. 👇goodlawproject.org/case/money-for…
And we're off!
Our judicial review over the Government contract awarded to friends of Dominic Cummings at Public First without competition has begun.
You can now read the extraordinary skeleton arguments and witness statements on our website. 👇 rebrand.ly/dc-case-tweet
Jason Coppel QC is taking the Court through our skeleton argument now: THREAD
“In a claim about the transparency of government spending, the Claimants find it astonishing that the Defendant has filed a statement of costs of over £200,000 for a one-day JR in which a significant part of the breaches alleged are admitted.”
We believe transparency is fundamental to ensuring public money is well spent. The @NAOorguk 'Investigation into Government procurement during the COVID-19 pandemic' backs up our concerns - para 3.24: nao.org.uk/wp-content/upl…
So we sought, have now obtained, and will soon pay for, urgent legal advice from specialist election law Counsel. But the advice, I am afraid, is rather discouraging. THREAD
The starting point is to identify legal failures by the returning officer.
Even this stage of the exercise is likely to be difficult because the returning officer is very likely to have an audit trail justifying their decisions to post on date x or use service y. /1
But it gets worse still. Even if you are able to identify legal failures you then have to show an effect on the outcome of the election for the election to be voided and re-run. /2