1/Ok so now that we are all interested in electricity reliability, really big ruling from the California PUC today. Recognizes a 7000MW (!!) shortfall by 2025 and calls for new resources, including 1000MW each of new geothermal and long duration storage. docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PublishedDocs/…
2/What’s going on? 2020 rotating outages exposed major vulnerabilities in California and in the next few years, Diablo Canyon nuclear and a lot of once-through cooling (OTC) natural gas is set to retire. The problem is just going to get worse.
3/The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) ruling looked at revised peak load requirements, shutdowns of nuclear and gas capacity, and compared it to existing planned procurement in the state. It’s not pretty. Mid case below:
4/The ALJ also looked at a high need scenario that accounts for a reduction in import capacity from the Navajo Coal plant, limited new import options, and an increase in peak demand due to climate change. The shortfall is over 10,000 MW in this scenario.
5/Important to note this isn’t just any capacity, this is total capacity that applies for Resource Adequacy based on the Effective Load Carrying Capability (ELCC). So each resource has its own effective capacity and that has to be taken into account.
6/Closing this gap is critical to preventing blackouts in the future. The ruling recommends accelerating existing capacity procurement across all resources (wind, solar, batteries, offshore wind, etc.) PLUS specific procurement of geothermal and long duration storage (LDS).
7/Urgent action is needed. In power planning timelines, 2025 is right around the corner. 1000MW of new geothermal would be a 60% increase in CA geothermal in just 5 years. LDS is just getting started, 1000MW is a lot there too. Doable, but needs action ASAP.
8/To get technologies like geothermal and LDS jump started that fast, real action is needed. The ruling proposes creating market certainty by both requiring Load Serving Entities (LSEs) to meet procurement requirements and creating a backstop procurement plan.
9/To be clear, this is just one part of a longer process. There will be reviews and engagement with all stakeholders as this works its way through the process. But this is a major step forward for decarbonization and reliability.
10/Advocates (like me) of geothermal and long duration storage have been talking for a long time about how firm, clean capacity will be very valuable in the future. With this ruling, that future is no longer theoretical, it’s here and now. END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tim Latimer

Tim Latimer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TimMLatimer

30 Oct 20
Regular reminder that pretty much everything defining the modern energy sector--wind, solar, shale O&G, li-ion batteries, EVs--has its roots in a brief period in the 70s when we actually spent $$$ on R&D. We can and should do it again. Chart from @ITIFdc.
Wind:

"In the United States, in contrast to Denmark, the oil crisis of 1973/4 resulted in a sudden government intervention into wind energy which, paradoxically, was to prove a crucial factor in the growth of Danish firms."
hbs.edu/faculty/Public…
Wind:

"Between 1973 and 1988, $380 million of federal was spent on wind turbine development. Following the pattern of AECs funding of civilian nuclear power , the government fully funded large turbines by leading firms, including Boeing, General Electric and Westinghouse."
Read 8 tweets
26 Oct 20
1/Alright, now that everyone is paying attention to geothermal, time to discuss one of the more exciting developments that is driving geothermal growth to become a mainstream resource: the emergence of modern, emission free, low temperature binary cycle geothermal plants. THREAD
2/Geothermal power for a long, long time, since at least 1904 when the Larderello steam field produced 10 kW in Tuscany. But for nearly the first 100 years, geothermal was limited to places like Larderello, extremely high temperature reservoirs.
power-technology.com/features/oldes…
3/This is because geothermal power used dry steam of flash technology, and to provide power, the fluid had to have enough steam to directly power a turbine. By contrast, binary cycle plants heat a different working fluid for the power conversion process. (from DOE GeoVision)
Read 16 tweets
12 Oct 20
1/Ok y’all, this @jasonbordoff piece is just fantastic. His boldest, and in my opinion accurate, claim is that petrostates will be winners of climate change policy. So let’s unpack that with a THREAD.
foreignpolicy.com/2020/10/05/cli…
2/The first principle you need to understand is the nature of current oil production and reserves:

Big Oil (Majors) makes the most headlines, but National Oil Companies (NOCs) have the most oil. Big Oil only controls ~10% of global oil reserves.
webstore.iea.org/download/direc…
3/And beyond that, not all reserves are equal. Check out WoodMac’s estimate on breakevens by resource. Notice something? The VAST MAJORITY of low cost oil is controlled by NOCs.
woodmac.com/reports/upstre…
Read 15 tweets
24 Jul 20
1/Emissions calculations for different techs have major impact on legislation, regulation, and customer perception, especially for geothermal, but are often not well understood. So today, a THREAD on operational and life cycle emissions, technologies, and how it impacts policy.
2/Some definitions. When we think about emissions for technologies, two common categories are operational emissions, just the emissions released at the source during operations, and life cycle analysis (LCA) emissions, which are all of the emissions in the entire process.
3/This graphic for cars is useful. The operational emissions are what come out of the tailpipe, but the LCA emissions are everything. Mining, manufacturing, fuels, recycling, land use, etc.
Read 15 tweets
7 Jul 20
1/This excellent NYT piece covers the shift in decarbonization to gas as coal gets phased out.

We’ve been arguing for so long about if gas can be a “bridge fuel”, we’ve missed the point. It’s already been a bridge fuel. But, a bridge to what? THREAD
nytimes.com/2020/07/06/bus…
2/How long have we been talking about the “bridge fuel”? Well check out comments from the 1992 Global Warming and the Earth Summit from none other the Kenneth Lay, yes that Kenneth Lay, of Enron fame:
3/This narrative of “bridge fuel” was seized on for decades, championed by folks like Aubrey McClendon (for the uninitiated, Aubrey is to fracking as Elon is to EVs) in conjunction with environmentalists like the Sierra Club as recently as 2010.
science.time.com/2012/02/02/exc…
Read 10 tweets
19 May 20
1/It has come to my attention that not everyone is aware of the incredible leadership Houston has shown on climate recently. This ain’t your 1980s Houston anymore. So inspired by @drvox, here is a roundup of some the great climate work from @HoustonTX:
2/First up renewable energy purchases: Houston will be 100% powered by renewable energy by 2025:
3/This is part of a long history of renewable energy purchases. Here is a notable one from 2013 that made Houston the largest municipal purchaser of renewable energy at the time:
c40.org/blog_posts/hou…
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!