Empirically incentives are cancelled in America. Aside from ritualized transactions, offering payment or other inducements makes people run away. I personally know two exceptions but I'm exceptionally well connected.
"Sex work is real work" is about bringing sex workers into the professional class with recognized ritualized transactions and an intelligible generally accepted social role. It's coordination against trade, immigrant entrepreneurs, and migrant farm workers.
People in the kinds of privilege classes I know how to get cozy with now approve of sex workers, their eyes light up when I suggested running sex workers for city council, but I don't think that would have happened if I'd suggested other gray-market entrepreneurs.
The offer to move a class of people out of the social category that might have been sanctioned as "speculator" under Russian state Communism is part of the mechanism by which entrepreneurs are preyed on by the various classes.
@HiFromMichaelV@wolftivy N is a white woman who's worked for 10+ years in credit unions, currently working on a project to expand access to credit for formerly incarcerated people.
@HiFromMichaelV@wolftivy In our first conversation, I pointed out the difference between credit scores as self-fulfilling prophecies about people's ability to roll over their debts based on future access to credit, and underwriting loans based on fundamentals.
@HiFromMichaelV@wolftivy (Her plan involved making special exceptions to the former but not doing anything about the structural features of the system that create privilege classes, and I wanted to point out that the bigger, more profitable, and more systemic-change-oriented opportunity is the latter.)
@AgnesCallard I think this whole thing is quite relevant to your New York Times piece. The same elements keep showing up in multiple contexts: silencing through medicalization and making things strictly about personal feelings to avoid investigating what happened.
Thankful for my first full day in my new home in NYC. So far, having 2 friends as flatmates seems simply good. I seem to have purged some neuroses about how things Should Be In A Place & some Containment fragments that were causing introversion.
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie I think this is being viewed from an angle that's causing debate behavior and a more fruitful behavior would be to rotate it to an angle that causes analysis behavior instead.
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie "There is nothing wrong with you" is a helpful but false statement from within a frame that reifies personal wrongness. But we can just decompose personal wrongness into its components!
@reasonisfun@DavidDeutschOxf@CurziRose@metaLulie There's approval and disapproval. There's error and disease. There's a particular parasitic behavior complex that involves reifiying disapproval as something like a permanent blemish and conflating that with error.
The plot of Miracle on 34th Street is wild. Santa Claus is the rightful king, speaking Dutch is a magic power, Quaker-level honesty gets you institutionalized, and the US Postal System is the legitimate judiciary. Sounds true.
USPS as Judiciary is plausible. They have to know what's going on materially. The Army has to know this stuff but only in wartime, the Courts are under NO similar performance pressure.
Also as the movie points out lower-court judges are often elected & therefore posturing. USPS is more disinterested.
@meditationstuff@reasonisfun If that is right, then either the Hegelianism hypothesis follows or I'm making a wrong inference.
@meditationstuff@reasonisfun Otherwise, it seems to me that either you ought to actually dismiss me as too stupid to engage with, or try to explain to me the other game (or point me to an explanation).