In an open letter 60 scientists criticize Angela Merkel's focus on electric vehicles. I'm flabbergasted by their lack of knowledge. Seems the combustion engine bubble is effectively shielding itself from reality. Let me try to burst their bubble (again). br.de/nachrichten/de…
They claim Merkel is 'ignoring physical realities' but the 'gotchas' they come up with have a very long beard by now and have been debunked over and over (e.g. see my pinned thread).
It reminds me of some nuclear bro's and clueless politicians advocating for thorium plants without being able to process the fact that it will take at least untill 2040 for such plants to arrive and without acknowledging they will probably be pretty expensive. But I digress.
The first physical reality they are ignoring is that eFuels from North Africa (plenty of room and sunshine there they say) is decades away IF it ever materializes. And even IF that where the future, why waste it in a combustion engine instead of a more efficient fuel cell?
The second physical reality they are ignoring is that over the lifetime of the electric vehicle, electricity will become cleaner.
The third physical reality they are ignoring is that smart charging electric vehicles will be a boon to solar and wind and a big headache for coal.
The fourth is that battery production is quickly getting less CO2 intensive.
I could go on and on but bottom line: I understand thousands of scientists in Germany make a living off combustion engines and it's fine if they defend them. But could they - for the love of God- inform themselves a bit better about the competition?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
German TV (@WDR) and car industry (@AudiOfficial) lying about electric vehicles. Again. See picture.
An official looking TV clip is making its ways to Audi car salesmen with points against electric vehicles that are simply wrong. Let me explain in a short thread.
I studied political science and it seems to me US democracy has become a reality soap with imagined grievances and tribalism more important for most people than democratic norms. And utterly irresponsible politicians will be able to run again with not even a slap on the wrist.
For me the root cause is irresponsible voters who think they can behave like hooligans at a football game. Who think politics is entertainment and they can just vote with their gut. Who are so insecure, coddled and entitled that they think they can choose their own facts.
The @guardian has a new piece on the well known problems related to electric vehicles, solar and wind.
I think the focus on resource use and responsible mining is great. As long as we also remind ourselves that fossil fuels are worse. theguardian.com/environment/20…
Remember that a car burns ~ 25 000 liters of fossil fuel over its lifetime. Do you really think that's better than 200 kg battery materials that's recyclable? And cobalt is also used for cleaning fossil fuel.
Apart from climate change the amount of ecosystem degradation, direct human suffering, conflict and corruption due to oil is much larger but that apparently generates less clicks. doi.org/10.1111/rode.1…
First I should be more precise:
- This is for the German situation.
- It looks at the price for farmers.
- There are large differences between types of meat and whether they are produced conventionally or organically.
This table shows the emissions per foodstuff in kg CO2eq per kg of foodstuff:
Beef 37 kg
Poultry 16-20 kg
Pork 6-10 kg
Eggs 1-2 kg
Milk 1 kg
Cereal 0.2-0.4 kg
Fruit 0.2-0.3 kg
Root crops 0.1 kg
Vegetables 0.0 kg
The report is very friendly about gasoline and diesel bc it conforms to official tests that we know are too optimistic about exhaust (e.g. from #dieselgate) but even then it just claims the problem won't go away when using EVs although there's a small but significant improvement.