THREAD: A couple of strategies to "stay on top of the literature"

It's important to note that just about everyone feels the same (see my Twitter search twitter.com/search?q=%22st…). It's absurdly difficult to stay on top of the literature. Thousands of papers are published EVERY DAY
Let's start with stating the obvious:
- There is an absolutely unmanageable influx of published work that would necessitate that we devote our lives to reading to even barely make it to "stay on top of the literature"
- There are too many competing demands for our time.
- Increased care work has meant that women have been disproportionately (NEGATIVELY) affected by this global pandemic.
- For some bizarre reason, some people seem to be operating on the assumption that life is normal when it's not, so workloads have increased, support has not.
- TIME IS NOT MALLEABLE. There are 24 hours in the day of which at least 7 woudl need to be dedicated to sleep (and for mothers, particularly of young children, this is absolutely impossible to do, sleep well). Parenting is very hard, single-parenting is super hard. + Academia!
- Being healthy is extremely important. At the same time, academia is ableist from its design. For those of us who have dealt with chronic pain, chronic fatigue, and other illnesses (including mental), it's challenging to juggle everything and maintain a semblance of a life.
We don't just "do stuff". We need to think, reflect, connect ideas, read AND write. To do that, you need to have some semblance of healthy body and mind, and it is VERY challenging to manage illnesses, life AND deal with the increasingly overwhelming multiple demands.
Ok, all of the above stated, I do believe that there are a couple of strategies that we can use to "catching up with the literature". Again, I'm going to state the obvious: THERE IS NO HUMANLY POSSIBLE WAY TO STAY ON TOP OF THE LITERATURE. There are ways, to "catch up" with it.
I remember loving my doctoral comprehensive exams because I was going to be able to READ and annotate, and take notes, and synthesize, etc. I was given a TASK (survey and master the literature) and a TIME ALLOCATION (1-2 years in most Canadian doctoral programmes).
Ok, so given that time is not malleable, and competing tasks are demanding our time, what can we do to catch up with the literature? Here are a few that I've used, even at my most ill. The key issue to remember here for me is: your (my) well being should be top priority.
Thinking of it as "catching up" instead of staying on top is crucial for me. I no longer aspire to be THE GO-TO-GUY FOR LITERATURE ON X (I used to be This Guy when I was in graduate school, by the way).

I've lowered my expectations of myself, and the demands I impose on myself.
1. The "One Paper a Day" #AICCSED Strategy

I thrive on routine, and there's something magical for me about having a printed paper and highlighting it and annotating it. But I know I have a metric tonne of things to do, so I try to JUST read ONE paper per day, and even then...
... I don't always read the full paper - I do a quick AIC skim (Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion). This blog post offers you (and your students) a template to apply AIC raulpacheco.org/2021/01/skimmi…

What I find key for me is to DUMP what I've extracted using AIC into a CSED row.
This routine (print paper, read, highlight, annotate, dump notes into a Conceptual Synthesis Excel Dump (CSED) row) is something I've grown to do within a reasonable amount of time (30 minutes) raulpacheco.org/2016/06/synthe…

This routine is what I call #AICCSED Processing.
(Obvious acronym stems from: AIC from the reading strategy and CSED from the systematizing strategy). Doing a daily #AICCSED helps me add notes and absorb material regularly without stressing about being "on top of the literature" (I will never be, I've accepted this).
I frequently challenge my Twitter followers to do a daily #AICCSED raulpacheco.org/2020/09/the-se…

It's challenging, but as a neoinstitutonal theorist I very strongly believe in routines. And more importantly, I believe in routines that do not put undue pressure on myself.
Remember: READING IS WRITING. raulpacheco.org/2018/01/legiti…

Sustaining a writing practice necessitates building a reading practice. Yes, those 30 minutes you spend reading an article may not look to you as "writing", but they ARE helping you (me!) generate and connect ideas.
2. The "Reading Fridays" Batch Processing #AICCSED strategy.

This was hard to do, and I know I'm privileged in being able to do this. Last semester, while teaching 4 courses, my Fridays were absolutely exhausting. So this semester I have turned Fridays into READING DAYS.
It is definitely stressful because I know I NEED to do A LOT of things at the same time. But if I am going to try to catch up with the literature, I put all my reading on one day: theses drafts, papers to grade, journal article reviews, etc. ALL THE READING GETS DONE ON A FRIDAY.
You are going to ask this question, so it's better if we get it out of the way:

- How do I decide what I can get away with? (that is, when do I know a paper should be read more in depth and therefore I need to allocate more time to read it?

This is a HEURISTICS OF TRIAGE.
In a way, we are all triaging every day. With competing demands on our time, and trying to juggle way too many tasks, we need to tend to issues that need our attention more (or, as the medical origing of triaging means, the patients that need the most help at the moment)
My policy, with myself and my students is: AIC if you're pressed for time, in-depth if while doing AIC you realize this paper is worthy of investing more time raulpacheco.org/2019/08/triagi…

I developed a Processing Protocol that you can find here: raulpacheco.org/2016/12/proces…
TO NOTE: I don't think we should JUST skim articles, book chapters and books. There's always the need for a Second Round of In-Depth Reading raulpacheco.org/2019/11/on-ski…

But that time allocation decision is internal to you, not external. Only you can decide if you need a second round
3. Per-Project Batch #AICCSED Processing

In addition to A-Day-A-Week-For-Reading Batch #AICCSED Processing and Daily #AICCSED Processing, I sometimes do this per-project. Usually when I am doing something new, or when I am meeting with a coauthor. I process the day before.
Doing Per-Project Batch #AICCSED Processing makes something easier for me: I don't jump across literatures that often. For example, this week I am collaborating with a colleague on a grant proposal. I'm reading on subnational politics, that's going to be my batch for this week
NEW BLOG POST: A few strategies to "stay on top of the literature" (more like, "catching up with the literature" raulpacheco.org/2021/02/a-few-…

This thread, in handy blog post format, so you can refer your students (or yourself!) to it. Hat tips to @ProfMattFox for inspiring this post

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega

Dr Raul Pacheco-Vega Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @raulpacheco

24 Feb
Attending this webinar right now. @JimGoldgeier is hosting and moderating, @adam_m_auerbach @ProfSaunders @LindsayMayka are panelists alongside David McBride from @OUPAcademic

The webinar will focus on the challenges facing academic authors of first books (dissertation-to-book)
Key points:

- @LindsayMayka - massive fieldwork, making sense of it, instead she wrote memos, not "a full dissertation"

- @ProfSaunders - the unpredictability of the process of writing itself.

- @adam_m_auerbach - impostor syndrome, raised expectations about the book.
In the second round of commentaries, @LindsayMayka mentions "writing dates" (log on to Zoom, write together for a couple of hours, converse on the chat about stuff if it comes up) - this is *exactly* the process that @amandabittner 's writing group follows (9-11 EST M-F)
Read 4 tweets
24 Feb
I got myself a few new methods books.

First, Pandian’s Methods Book. Image
This book will be well known to my public policy friends. Image
This book is one I am discussing in a forthcoming edited volume. Image
Read 8 tweets
19 Feb
THREAD: On doing citation tracing for a review/survey of the literature/state of the art, on the ground.

Most of you who read my blog will know I've written several posts about how we need to map relationships across authors, papers, literatures, disciplines, bodies of work.
I am collaborating on a grant proposal, and also writing a paper on subnational comparative public policy. Most of you who have followed me for a long time or have read my scholarly work will know I have also taught State and Local Government (feel free to ask for my syllabi).
I'm also doing some work on the comparative politics of subnational health policies. While not 100% new to me, I do need to refresh my knowledge of how the comparative method is applied at the subnational level (I taught Comparative Methods at the doctoral level last semester)
Read 9 tweets
17 Feb
Evento: "Encuestas y Elecciones: Metodologías, Muestras y Aplicaciones"

YouTube:

Facebook Live: facebook.com/CiopMX/videos/…

Participa Rodrigo @salazar_elena Coordinador del #LabdeM (Laboratorio de Métodos) de la @FlacsoMx
Inicia @IsaCordu su presentación. Isabel sugiere que en el estudio de la opinión pública, utilizar métodos mixtos puede ser interesante. Image
.@ricartur59 presenta una diversidad de estrategias de muestreo y estratificación y los distintos métodos que se podrían utilizar para comprender la opinión pública.

No toda la población se puede analizar. Image
Read 6 tweets
13 Feb
THREAD: On the full-fledged process of responding to a Revise-And-Resubmit (R&R).

I have written pieces of the process, but I hadn't actually written a thread or a blog post showcasing how all my blog posts fit with one another. I teach this process when I give workshops.
So here's what I do (now), and let me share a lesson from my past lives:

DO NOT SIT ON R&Rs.

I know, they're painful and scary and sometimes we don't know if our paper will get rejected in the end.

But remember, an R&R means an OPPORTUNITY to get your paper published.
Sitting on R&Rs, leaving them for later, and not prioritizing them has gotten me fewer publications. I know this for a fact. I am not ashamed of admitting that I have sometimes felt that I will not be capable of responding to multiple (often conflicting) comments.

HOWEVER...
Read 17 tweets
11 Feb
It's almost February 15th, 2021, which means I get to muse about planning, yearly planning, etc.

As most of you know, I'm a very systematic planner. Even in the face of COVID19, which threw every plan I had out the window. Even in the face of chronic illness, which did the same
To me, planning is a tool to maintain a semblance of control in my life. Because I know that all bets are off right now, my planning is quite relaxed, to-the-point and non-committal. Do I have to teach 2 courses this fall? Those DO go in the plan. Do I have to resubmit R&Rs?
My yearly planning process through the Everything Notebook has the advantage (for me) that I can be as ambitious or non-ambitious as I want or need.

There is stuff that MUST go in there, but there are also things that can be rescheduled/terminated. raulpacheco.org/2016/12/my-yea…
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!