An interesting thread by George Monbiot. But a few things come out of it.
There's an admission that a diversity of grazing animals have a role to play in maintaining a healthy environment. Farmed animals like cattle are important. With no grazing animals another form of /1
monoculture, just as damaging, would appear.
Yesterday George, in ignorance more than anything, attacked Plaid's opposition to the Government's NVZs, claiming that the NVZs would be better, environmentally. The scientific advice is to oppose the NVZs. The NVZ proposal would /2
lead to farmers in upland Wales, notably Meirionnydd, to pull out of cattle, which would lead to only sheep grazing the highlands, thus creating the damage that he is so opposed to. One of the reasons why the NVZ is bad not only for farming but also for the environment. /3
Finally there's an admission that he wants to see the landscape revert to the forests that were there. We have the same percentage of canopy cover in Wales today as was here in the C15th. So he wants to take us back earlier, to the Protohistoric period, 4000+ years ago /4
George is talking a bout a 4000+ year process and wanting to change it over night, but constantly attacking, denegrating, finger wagging and criticising is no way to build a bridge to reach his goal. There are livelihoods, generations of work, a culture, and a way of life /5
that feel threatened by this constant barrage. Farmers have responded to dictats from everywhere, telling them what to do, and that a computer model knows best. Then they are blamed for the consequences of following these rules /6
Politicians come and go but the farms have been here for generations. Work with them and you'll find that the community is a willing partner, because they want to see improved soil, an improved environment for their stock, and improved outcomes for the society that they live in.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The reults of BBC Wales' St David's day poll, published today, have already started a discussion. In the #IndyWales movement people are asking how can it be that the % of those supporting Independence is lower in tbis poll than previous polls? Simple... /1
Wording.
It sounds innocuous, trivial, or petty even. But the words used in a question are absolutely crucial in how the people respond. The wording also reflects on those commissioning the poll. In this instance the BBC has opted for continuity /2
They use the same form of words that they've used over many years in order to measure against. But I think they need to ask themselves: is this the right question to ask in the first place? Does the wording manage to entice the response that correctly reflects the public mood? /3
🐟 Fishing has become something of a cause célèbre for Brexiteers, and is an issue used to justify Brexit.
⚓ Forty years ago UK trawlers were more than happy to sail the seven seas casting their nets far and wide for fish in other foreign seas.
⬇️
🇮🇸 That is until the cod wars with Iceland.
🇪🇺 The EEC (as it was) stepped in, and brokered an agreement which placed a boundary around the seas, to ensure fairness and parity.
🇬🇧 The UK has the same rights as other coastal states.
⬇️
💹 But, following Thatcherism and the belief that the UK should concentrate on the service sector and allow manufacturing to decline, the UK Government decided to sell the fishing rights to UK waters.
I think the current UK Government have deliberately misled and lied, and I don't think that's how politics should be conducted.
While it might lead to short term political success, the long term effects are damaging, as it undermines trust.
So, with that in mind I must try to stay true to myself and ensure that I don't purposefully or unintentionally mislead anybody either.
Last night I was listening to a debate in the Senedd about the current Coronavirus restrictions, and a comment made by Health Minister
struck me. I tweeted about it afterwards, then searched for the record and placed the video here. The Minister's comment wasn't worded particularly well, but my understanding was that he said that the Tory spokesperson had attended less than half the Health Committee
The UK Government failed to take the pandemic seriously in early 2020. They first had months to prepare. When it was rampaging through Italy in February, they could have made preparations. Neither the UK nor Welsh Governments took action /2
We rightly blame the UK Government. Operation Cygnus informed us some years ago that the UK was woefully ill prepared for a public health crisis of this kind.
But the Welsh Government are equally to blame. Over a decade ago they were warned of a lack in the Health workforce /3
With the number of MPs from Wales soon to be slashed, it's worth looking towards the Second Chamber, The House of Lords, to see how Wales performs there.
A thread
👇
➡️There are 800 Peers sitting in the House of Lords;
➡️Of the 777 Members included in the June 2019 claims data and eligible to sit, 523 chose to include a broad location for their main residence, 254 did not.
👇
Of these,
🏴84.1% were from England;
🏴9% from Scotland;
🏴3.8% from Wales;
🏴2.3% from Northern Ireland;
🌍0.8% from overseas
These statements are making the Unionist cause look increasingly desperate and panicky. This by Drakeford, who's an intelligent man, is illogical and demeans him.
First he wants us to use our imaginations. OK let's imagine that Wales was independent. We'd then have our /1
equivalent of SAGE, yes, but would we be so arrogant as to ignore advice from WHO and other countries?
Would we have been so late to lockdown?
Would we have had a PM that went around hospitals shaking hands with Covid-19 patients?
Would we have had a PM that refused to /2
to attend our equivalent of COBRA?
Would we have had a government that refused to take steps to social distance sooner?
Would we have had a government that failed to invest properly in our NHS and chose instead to implement austerity and invest in willy waving projects?
/3