The reults of BBC Wales' St David's day poll, published today, have already started a discussion. In the #IndyWales movement people are asking how can it be that the % of those supporting Independence is lower in tbis poll than previous polls? Simple... /1
Wording.
It sounds innocuous, trivial, or petty even. But the words used in a question are absolutely crucial in how the people respond. The wording also reflects on those commissioning the poll. In this instance the BBC has opted for continuity /2
They use the same form of words that they've used over many years in order to measure against. But I think they need to ask themselves: is this the right question to ask in the first place? Does the wording manage to entice the response that correctly reflects the public mood? /3
ITV Wales use YouGov. The last Indy response showed approximately 1/3 of respondents supporting Independence. BBC's latest ICM poll has that figure at 14%. But we're not comparing like with like. Apples and pears, as they say. Let's look at the questions /4
YouGov ask:
"If there was a referendum tomorrow on Wales becoming an independent country and this was the question, how would you vote? Should Wales be an independent country?" /5
However, BBC/ICM ask:
"Should Wales become independent, separate from the UK?" /6
These are two different questions. One is posed as a positive, and the other a negative. 'Separate' has negative connotations, while 'United' (U in UK) is a positive. The Q is asking if the respondent wants something damaging to happen to something that's posed as a positive /7
While the YouGov question carries no baggage. It stands alone.

This isn't new. There are studies about the impact of the difference in wording in Scotland. I wrote about it 4 years ago:
bellagwalia.org/2017/03/14/sil…
Also, we have to accept that as things stand it's hypothetical /8
We need the actual wording of what will be on a ballot paper in a referendum to have a real reflection. It's obvious that an unionist party won't give us that referendum, and therefore won't design the wording. So we can safely assume that the people of Wales /9
won't be asked about 'separation'. That being the case, it begs the question, what's the point of the BBC/ICM question? It tells us nothing, and adds nothing to the national debate. BBC should bite the bullet and reword it to gage a real reflection of the views in Wales. /Fin

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mabon ap Gwynfor 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

Mabon ap Gwynfor 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mabonapgwynfor

26 Feb
An interesting thread by George Monbiot. But a few things come out of it.
There's an admission that a diversity of grazing animals have a role to play in maintaining a healthy environment. Farmed animals like cattle are important. With no grazing animals another form of /1
monoculture, just as damaging, would appear.
Yesterday George, in ignorance more than anything, attacked Plaid's opposition to the Government's NVZs, claiming that the NVZs would be better, environmentally. The scientific advice is to oppose the NVZs. The NVZ proposal would /2
lead to farmers in upland Wales, notably Meirionnydd, to pull out of cattle, which would lead to only sheep grazing the highlands, thus creating the damage that he is so opposed to. One of the reasons why the NVZ is bad not only for farming but also for the environment. /3
Read 7 tweets
12 Dec 20
🐟 Fishing has become something of a cause célèbre for Brexiteers, and is an issue used to justify Brexit.

⚓ Forty years ago UK trawlers were more than happy to sail the seven seas casting their nets far and wide for fish in other foreign seas.
⬇️
🇮🇸 That is until the cod wars with Iceland.

🇪🇺 The EEC (as it was) stepped in, and brokered an agreement which placed a boundary around the seas, to ensure fairness and parity.

🇬🇧 The UK has the same rights as other coastal states.

⬇️
💹 But, following Thatcherism and the belief that the UK should concentrate on the service sector and allow manufacturing to decline, the UK Government decided to sell the fishing rights to UK waters.

This wasn't the EUs decision. It was the UK.
⬇️
Read 7 tweets
10 Dec 20
Misleading

I think the current UK Government have deliberately misled and lied, and I don't think that's how politics should be conducted.

While it might lead to short term political success, the long term effects are damaging, as it undermines trust.
So, with that in mind I must try to stay true to myself and ensure that I don't purposefully or unintentionally mislead anybody either.

Last night I was listening to a debate in the Senedd about the current Coronavirus restrictions, and a comment made by Health Minister
struck me. I tweeted about it afterwards, then searched for the record and placed the video here. The Minister's comment wasn't worded particularly well, but my understanding was that he said that the Tory spokesperson had attended less than half the Health Committee
Read 5 tweets
9 Dec 20
Covid increase in Wales - the blame game

It's convenient for politicians to blame the people. It's a form of deflection. But people respond to circumstances and cues from authority.

We need to be honest about the situation we find ourselves in

Thread ⬇️
The UK Government failed to take the pandemic seriously in early 2020. They first had months to prepare. When it was rampaging through Italy in February, they could have made preparations. Neither the UK nor Welsh Governments took action /2
We rightly blame the UK Government. Operation Cygnus informed us some years ago that the UK was woefully ill prepared for a public health crisis of this kind.

But the Welsh Government are equally to blame. Over a decade ago they were warned of a lack in the Health workforce /3
Read 15 tweets
12 Nov 20
With the number of MPs from Wales soon to be slashed, it's worth looking towards the Second Chamber, The House of Lords, to see how Wales performs there.

A thread
👇
➡️There are 800 Peers sitting in the House of Lords;
➡️Of the 777 Members included in the June 2019 claims data and eligible to sit, 523 chose to include a broad location for their main residence, 254 did not.
👇
Of these,
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿84.1% were from England;
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿9% from Scotland;
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿3.8% from Wales;
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁮󠁩󠁲󠁿2.3% from Northern Ireland;
🌍0.8% from overseas
Read 8 tweets
8 Jun 20
These statements are making the Unionist cause look increasingly desperate and panicky. This by Drakeford, who's an intelligent man, is illogical and demeans him.
First he wants us to use our imaginations. OK let's imagine that Wales was independent. We'd then have our /1
equivalent of SAGE, yes, but would we be so arrogant as to ignore advice from WHO and other countries?
Would we have been so late to lockdown?
Would we have had a PM that went around hospitals shaking hands with Covid-19 patients?
Would we have had a PM that refused to /2
to attend our equivalent of COBRA?
Would we have had a government that refused to take steps to social distance sooner?
Would we have had a government that failed to invest properly in our NHS and chose instead to implement austerity and invest in willy waving projects?
/3
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!