@metaphrenology@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@twCyborg@BW What you seen to be saying, Mr. Fowler, is that Washington should get a political privilege larger cities don't - having two senators - so it will go on enjoying another privilege those cities don't (the level of autonomy enjoyed by a state).
@metaphrenology@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@twCyborg@BW What we're saying is that politically speaking, the city of Washington doesn't get to eat its cake and have it, too. If it wants to be represented in Congress, like the other cities, it has to be subject to the rule of a state legislature, like the other cities.
@metaphrenology@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@twCyborg@BW A real state, not a fiction like "New Columbia" created just to create the illusion that the city of Washington wasn't being given a privileged political position.
@metaphrenology@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@twCyborg@BW The privilege of this position being one that would be enjoyed by a relatively few ambitious politicians far more than it would be enjoyed by its people, in the short run.
In the long run, "New Columbia" would not be viable as anything but a beggar state.
There's no room for growth, no empty places to build in, unless one counts parks and burnt out vacant lots.
@metaphrenology@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@twCyborg@BW The kind of poor person who wants the world to buy his liquor for him, and doesn't ask for much more out of life than that, might like this proposal, because now he and his neighbors in that 68.34 square miles of city would have two senators to do their rent seeking for them.
@metaphrenology@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@twCyborg@BW But what about the person living in Washington who just asks for a fair chance to earn an honest living, and finds himself in a city with no real tax base, and nowhere to establish one?
@SwtBeat@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@metaphrenology@twCyborg@BW No, he was given a specious argument, not a reason. This is the reality of politics: any given segment of an electorate won't get everything it wants. It has to compromise with the rest of the electorate.
Yes, it will. So what? The city of Chicago loses some of its autonomy by being part of Illinois. Should we get two senators, too?
@SwtBeat@TweetPro13@Fern26430103@metaphrenology@twCyborg@BW While we're at it, having made Chicago into its own state, we might notice that north side politics doesn't look much like south side politics and so, applying what seems to be your proposed principle, we'd have to split Chicago into more than one state.
@claire9219@twCyborg@BW Except there's a good reason for enhancing the political power of large, sparsely populated regions like Wyoming. If this was not done, the more populous states would be able to use the less populous ones as colonies, to be used and abused.
@claire9219@twCyborg@BW This is not a grim hypothetical situation, either. Something very similar has already been seen to happen at the state level, when there is proportional representation.
@claire9219@twCyborg@BW Note the case of the once reasonably lush county in California that was turned into a wasteland because Los Angeles wanted its water. The local people had no say in the matter. Political might made right, they were out of luck, and their home was destroyed.
@TexasFirefight3@Lauren32486@la_rockestrella@USMarshalsHQ Calm down, Tex. The US Marshals are not going to come riding in to help you overthrow President Biden. If you have enough of a death wish to go on that foolish crusade, you're on your own.
@TexasFirefight3@Lauren32486@la_rockestrella@USMarshalsHQ Abraham Lincoln took the oath of office in March, because at the time, that was when presidents were sworn into office. January 20 didn't become the date for that until 1933.
@TexasFirefight3@Lauren32486@la_rockestrella@USMarshalsHQ As for why they were sneaking the president-elect into Washington in 1861, what John Wilkes Booth did to the man a few years later should offer a good hint. There were people who did not wish the new president well.
The US Marshalls were doing a "this day in history" tweet, because the history that happened on this day was history that their office played a role in. They got President Lincoln into Washington, safely.
@PersianChickk@john_sipher Any claim that tweet is support for any sort of insurrection is anachronistic for reasons that the office cites.
Also, if Portnoy decides to get his tweets blocked from the Internet Archive, he will run into the fact that destroyed evidence is legally presumed detrimental to the party destroying it.