You know, the first time I wrote about @noorchashm, I thought that maybe I had been too hard on him when I called him a "useful idiot" for the antivaccine movement. Now that I see he's appeared on @lifebiomedguru's show, I realize that my gut instinct about him was spot-on. 1/
However, before #COVID19@lifebiomedguru had a long history of being an antivaccine activist. Basically, he was a scientist who ran a genomics/bioinformatics core who somehow went crank antivax several years ago. 3/
Characteristically, @lifebiomedguru fired back, parroting antivax talking points that school vaccine mandates are "not scientifically supported"; "unethical"; and "violate informed consent." 7/ respectfulinsolence.com/2018/02/09/ant…
In his response to @LeslieManookian, @lifebiomedguru wrote: "Let me state this as clearly as possible: as currently formulated, vaccines are filthy, nasty vials of toxic sludge that every American citizen and parent should be able to refuse for any reason." 8/
I wonder if @noorchashm agrees with @lifebiomedguru that vaccines are "filthy, nasty vials of toxic sludge" or his seeming belief that vaccines might cause autism. 9/
More recently, right before the pandemic, @lifebiomedguru teamed up with antivax pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas to do truly awful science demonizing aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. 10/ respectfulinsolence.com/2019/12/20/dem…
So, I ask you, my Tweeps, what do we call a physician like @noorchashm who's so dedicated to his idée fixe that #COVIDvaccine is dangerous in those who've already had #COVID19 that he's willing to appear on the vlog of a rabid antivaxxer to push his idea? 11/
Yes, I was correct the first time; my gut instinct was correct. @noorchashm is a useful idiot for the antivaccine movement. I now expect that he'll try to email my department chair yet again to complain about how mean and "unprofessional" I am to have said that about him. 12/12
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seriously, @PolitiFact, read it again. It does EXACTLY the opposite and says basically the same thing as your own article on the subject of #COVIDVaccine and prion disease, just in more detail. 2/ politifact.com/factchecks/202…
I mean, really, @PolitiFact, haven't you ever heard of Betteridge's law of headlines? Did you even bother to read the intro blurb that points out J. Bart Classen's idea is based on bad speculative science? 3/
Laughter. And to respond that I'm not going to watch a 2+ hour video by some rando on Twitter about just about anything, much less pushing dubious science. I have better things to do with my time.
If he summarizes his objections and whatever evidence he can muster in the form of an article no more than twice the word count of my blog post, I might engage, but there's no way in hell I'm sitting through such a long video that gave me a headache after 5 minutes.
Seriously, argument by YouTube is the LEAST likely way to get my attention, as I am not going to watch a two hour YouTube video on just about anything.🙄
For example, he parrots tired old Holocaust denial tropes that I was dealing with over 20 years ago. They're the same; they haven't even really evolved with the times, like other conspiracy theories.
I mean, holy hell, He's actually pulling the "Zyklon-B is a delousing agent" Holocaust denial gambit. That's an oldie-moldy denier deception of the dumbest order.
This is, of course, the dumbest antimask analogy out there. It betrays utter ignorance of virology and physics gussied up with a false sense of knowledge, so much so that I can feel neurons in my brain apoptosing whenever I see some ignoramus post this brain dead talking point.🙄