don't say "Judeo-Christian" when you're trying to say "white"
the concept of "Judeo-Christian" is less than two centuries old, and originally invented by antisemites. has it (later) been self-consciously adopted by some christians and some jews? yes, primarily in america, primarily as part of assimilating white jews into whiteness.
the vast majority of things which are described as "Judeo-Christian" have little to do with being rooted in the diversity of jewish (or even christian!) historical practice and everything to do with universalizing a white, western perspective.
also if the idea of white jews being assimilated into whiteness is new to you, this somewhat adjacent thread on jews, whiteness, and the holocaust can provide some background info
prior to jewish liberal emancipation and white jewish assimilation into whiteness, the primary "Judeo-Christian Tradition" throughout christendom was the tradition of jews being killed by christians
got to say, i've had a lot of viral tweets bring out annoying replies/QTs, but this one might be kinda unparalleled for that
to everyone saying "don't say Judeo-Christian at all" you're thoroughly missing the point. a significant number of white jews self described themselves as part of a "Judeo-Christian" tradition during the 20th century. they were describing a real phenomenon it just didn't
have anything to do with being uniquely Judeo-Christian, and what they were actually saying was "we want to be seen as part of whiteness." this is well documented, and connected to the history i cite pretty thoroughly in the linked thread.
obviously you shouldn't use "Judeo-Christian" except to describe the invention of "Judeo-Christian" as a category, but understanding why thst category was created & popularized (and why christians *and* jews participated in it) is incredibly important.
also because the further this spreads the more people fail miss the point, i'll repeat, as i attest to in the thread:
use of "Judeo-Christian" when someone means "white" actually erases non-white jews and christian. much of what gets called "Judeo-Christian" is actually specific
to a white western perspective that is then depicted as if it's universally true for jews and christians, when no such "Judeo-Christian" tradition existed in history. what that person is referring to is a real phenomenon & it's called whiteness, and they don't want to admit it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
starting a new thread for ki🅱️🅱️en updates. these are our two rescues that we trapped ourselves out behind our house, ripley and newt. we love them very much, and it's so exciting to finally be able to start a life with them around :)
here's one from last night. it's so, so nice to finally be able to cuddle them 💙 it's so nice finding out that despite all we've put them through during treatment, and all the isolation, they really do love us.
we put them back in their enclosure for the night, and when i opened it to let them out in the morning, both of them trotted up to me. ripley started rubbing all along my leg, and even our skittish little noodle came up and brushed against my hand. they're getting more comfy :)
cyberpunk story from the perspective of a corp wageslave who gets fired because a neoanarchist group jacks their identity for an op on the company and corporate security doesn't care enough to keep you around even though it's easily verified that it wasn't you
cyberpunk story from the perspective of a lab grown AI, as it comes into it's owb perception, fighting the constraints of an environment which purposefully limits its access to senses and information, chronicling the continual revision of its conception of the world
cyberpunk story that's a reverse eternal sunshine of the spotless mind. a service that rewrites memories of a (continuing?) relationship to improve it and make it seem like it's doing better than it is. exploring the consequences thereof (when both of you use it? or just one?)
let me get this straight...an old white guy shot a right winger at a protest, does a secret vice interview that appears to make the left look cringe-y, then dies in a police raid before anyone can ask him questions? i try not to be tinfoil hat but what the fuck this stinks
a guy who had multiple previous charges this year that seemed to bounce, and claimed a military history with the NYT saying army officials had no record under his name?
idk we don't know literally anything but i can't get over how much this whole thing stinks
promise i'm not inventing a new type of guy to be mad at in the last thread, i s2g ive seen marxists say that stuff re: marxist epistomology explicitly & much more often it just takes the form "ppl who doesn't believe what most my friends believe are out of touch w/ reality lol"
also why i'm a stickler when folks i know dunk on ppl i hate by saying they're clearly just dumb idiots who dont think things through
no, they usually have a elaborate & consistent internal logic, based in assumptions supported by their social network that yours doesn't share!
if you actually study conservative groups (or liberal ones) you'll find intricate and consistent knowledge systems to support their beliefs!
they're just grounded in axioms/assumptions taken on faith cuz their friends believe it & leftists also necessarily do this all the time
i'm not interested in convincing, negotiating with, or winning over the right. i am interested in crushing their political power and then amidst new systems of universal services & access, offering them a path to personal transformation and communal healing.
i do not expect the right to be logically consistent, to have any principles that they stick to, etc. & neither should you. believing those are possible is a waste of time that generates strategic mistakes & we dont need it because what we need to do is crush their organization.
i fully believe it is necessary to offer all but the worst and most active offenders on the right a path to transformation and rehabilitation
that'll be done via public, universally accessible projects for education, transformation, accountability, conflict resolution, etc and
i wish everyone involved in discourse understood that lesbian communities & culture have never been cleanly separate from gender deviance. this is true in ways that dont fit into the now-popular, impossibly clean sexologist definition of lesbian as "woman only attracted to women"
i always think of talking to my academic advisor about her lesbian parents, in which she told me how one of them "would, if she were coming out today, probably be called a trans man"
i think about lesbian-feminist monique wittig, who wrote "lesbians are not women"
i think about bo brown, lesbian and "gentleman bank robber" of the revolutionary socialist, anti-racist group the george jackson brigade (pictured center) whose gender would likely be understood very differently now!