Should I weigh in on the 'is Dr. Seuss cancelled?' issue? Those who know me know I may be too close to this one.
Dr. Seuss should not be cancelled but there are racially problematic images in the books (not just in his very racist old cartoons, from before he was a children's book author.)
There are non-problematic features of the books that are made problematic by the fact that the books are so ... hegemonic in the children's section. So many Seuss stories take place in the head of some little lunatic white American boy from 1950.
We see the world askew through his eyes. But the weight of Dr. Seuss makes that view ... normative. Nothing wrong with 'go out there and get 'em, kiddo!' Just ... read something else for variety. Not every reader is some Will to Power-addled white American suburban male loon.
Adorable as I find that type to be, personally.
Before the age of 8 or so.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Holbo

John Holbo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jholbo1

3 Mar
I read the news today o boy. Six Dr. Seuss books cancelled. 1/ washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
The books do contain negative stereotypes. It qualifies as a genuine minor dilemma. It is a fascinating, ethically fiddly topic to argue! At the same time, one of the two major parties in the US has, as its sole policy goal at present, vote suppression. 2/ apnews.com/article/dr-seu…
This generates a minor meta-dilemma. I don't want to forbid people debating the minor dilemma (just how harmful is it to small children that Seuss contains negative ethnic stereotypes?) just because voter suppression is more clear and consequential. Which it for sure is. 3/
Read 19 tweets
14 Jan
You know, @jtlevy ought to talk more about his book in relation to contemporary politics. It seems relevant to these interesting times. 1/ books.google.com.sg/books/about/Ra… Image
Let me try to condense a main lesson of it, as I see it, and give an obvious, contemporary application. 2/
Liberalism (in the broad sense, not the partisan D sense) concerns the proper relationship between the individual and the state. This leave 'intermediate groups' - thick civic society - betwixt and between. 3/
Read 16 tweets
13 Jan
The drama of 'lawful evil cleric joins party of chaotic neutral thieves for profit' has played out more than once this admin. (Jeff Sessions.) Such moral tragedy provokes audiences to ask: how to be true to law, in a crisis, yet without abandoning evil? nytimes.com/2021/01/12/us/…
OK, joking aside, do I really think Pence is evil? Like, EVIL-evil? He and I don't just have policy disagreements? Let's ask, instead: why does it make perfect sense that Jeff Sessions and Mike Pence would both get in bed with Trump, and both find the experience so debasing?
The short answer is that Pence and Sessions are not that different from Trump in SOME ways, though they are his opposite in OTHERS. (This is not a truth caught by Gary Gygax's moral compass.)
Read 10 tweets
11 Jan
So I get off the news to go read about heresies - no kidding! - and, just before I go, this - THIS!
So Belle and I are like, is Pelagianism top 10 heresy material? Y/N?

Me: hey, Siri, what are the top-10 Christian heresies?
Siri: I found this on the web.

news.fordham.edu/inside-fordham…
My pics were, off the top of my head:

Lutheranism (call it Protestantism)
Arianism
Gnosticism
Deism
Pantheism (Spinozism)
Donatism
Catharism (Albigensianism)
Pelagianism
Universalism

And then I kind of got stumped.
Read 9 tweets
11 Jan
McCarthy thinks Trump deserves to be impeached. Image
But also that Trump shouldn't get what he deserves. It's so little! a few days! But the same consideration should cut the other way: it's so little. Just a few days. Why not do the right thing? Image
Because the R base wants Congress NOT to do the right thing, is why. But is that a good reason not to do the right thing, on a basic point of principle? McCarthy is basically saying: our base won't tolerate their reps upholding the constitution. Well, what should leaders do?
Read 5 tweets
11 Jan
theamericanconservative.com/dreher/trump-c… OK. The good thing is: he admits Trump should be impeached. That's good. Image
And good on him for apologizing to the Never Trumpers. Image
But he needs to work on this part. Image
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!