Supreme Court bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan to shortly hear plea by @AmazonPrime 's Aparna Purohit against Allahabad HC order which rejected her anticipatory bail plea in the case registered in connection with the web series '#Tandav'
Senior Adv Mukul Rohatgi: Its a shocking case.
Rohatgi: This lady is an employee employee Of Amazon. Now this lady, producer and actor is made an accused. Now company is not an accused. They are only publicity seekers filing cases all over India
Rohatgi: this movie can be paid only by payment. It's not free
Justice Bhushan: Please submit the regulations on OTT platforms. We are of the view that there should be some screening of such programs. At times they are showing pornography too.
Senior Adv Rohatgi: Allahabad High Court order was not based on OTT regulations. It's about freedom of speech and expression
SC: Its about creating a balance.
Solicitor-General: They are showing filthy things with abuses too.
Supreme Court adjourns the case to tomorrow. Solicitor-General asked to circulate the recently published OTT regulations by the centre
Rohatgi: OTT regulations were put in place a few weeks back. How is it applicable in my case ?
Matter adjourned.
Correction:
Rohatgi: This movie can be watched only on payment. It is not free.
[Tandav] There should be screening of programs on OTT platforms, at times they are showing pornography: Supreme Court in Aparna Purohit bail plea
Karnataka HC is hearing two petitions moved by Amazon and flipkart seeking to quash the probe ordered by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against them for alleged violations of Competition Law.
ASG Madhavi Divan appearing for CCI continues to make submissions
Divan submits on issue of confidentiality. Says that confidentiality will not apply unless it is a trade secret. This is the ruling of the Supreme Court.
These matters against parties in Competition law are in rem: Divan
#BombayHighCourt will shortly begin hearing the plea filed by #ArnabGoswami assailing his arrest and detention by the Raigad police in the FIR accusing him of abetment to suicide of interior designer Anvay Naik and the subsequent chargesheet filed in the matter.
Justice DY Chandrachud: One of the gravest problems of computer age is cut and paste order. I hate seeing High Court orders only doing cut and paste. If you are upholding something you have to give reasons.
Justice Chandrachud: No independent application of mind. Cutting and pasting from Tribunal judgment may add to volume of pages but does not address the core issue of the appeal.
Justice Chandrachud: Issue was whether respondent was correctly denied admission to IAS noting a disciplinary action was imposed upon him. IAS states DoPT guidelines apply for promotion.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a plea by Andhra Pradesh govt challenging the AP HC order staying the Government Orders pertaining to the constitution of a special investigation team to probe the alleged #AmaravatiLandScam
Justice Ashok Bhushan led bench of #SupremeCourt to shortly peruse the latest OTT regulations passed by Centre in a plea by @AmazonPrime head Aparna Purohit challenging Allahabad HC order denying her anticipatory bail.
Purohit faced a barrage of cases after #TANDAV was aired
Senior Adv Mukul Rohatgi: I appear for Aparna Purohit along with Senior Adv Siddharth Luthra
Justice Bhushan: Mr Mehta we went through the Technology intermediary guidelines. But there is no teeth. No power of prosecution. These are just guidelines. No mechanism to control it