I note in the response to Alex Rowley MSP, @JeaneF1Freeman mentions NHS Fife attempting to get a second opinion from NHS England and NHS Glasgow. You failed to mention, however, Jeane, the fact that they went to lothian and lothian dropped it because...
...they were lied to by NHS Fife and also because NHS Fife failed to disclose to the SPSO that the lothian and fife services had merged 3 months prior to the SPSO's ruling meaning they were trying to send it to themselves. The false claims with respect to clinical status...
....resulting in the doctor at NHS Lothian dropping it due to conflict of interest. I also note your failure to disclose to Mr. Rowley the fact that they then went to NHS Grampian and that the doctor didn't go ahead with that second opinion because NHS Fife tried to...
...get him to sign a non-disclosure agreement which would have prevented him putting his opinion on the patients medical records. I also note that you failed to mention to Mr. Rowley the fact that ther was no reason for the opinion not being done by NHS England...
...that was disclosed, or the fact that the NHS Glasgow second opinion deliberately excluded the patient from self-advocacy and that the referral paperwork has deliberately been witheld from the patient so he is unable to check the veracity of claims made about....
....clinical status to NHS Glasgow. I also note that you fail to mention that you wont step into the issue until the SPSO issues a section 16 special report (knowing that the SPSO has never issued one in its 20-year existence and that there is no formal criteria for issuing it)..
I also note that you did not mention the fact that despite NHS Fife not complying with the ruling of the SPSO since the 2nd of May 2019 and the entire complaint now having subsisted for 4 YEARS as of the 9th of Feb, it is still not resolved.
Now I have not released the correspondence pertinent to this complaint because you and I both know that my correspondence goes into other serious issues at the board which are relevant to the current national health crisis.
However, on the basis that I am now 4 years overdue for a surgery which was denied on a technicality which the SPSO ruled was unreasonable. On the basis that I am having to sleep verticle because acid is burning my throat and lungs, destroying my teeth etc....
...on the basis that I am losing fine motor function in both hands because of reliance on a walking aid I would not otherwise require - and on the basis that I am now having to seek cardiac examinations due to high blood pressure (a complication which I have been warning...
...could happen as a result of all this for four years) perhaps you and your department might get its finger out of its arse and fix this. Not after the issuing of a section 16 report from the SPSO which will never come, but before you retire!
Or I can just have your ass hauled back to explain yourself when this eventually ends up in a judicial review? Your choice minister!
Furthermore, I absolutely condemn the SPSO - It is a toothless and useless organisation that spends more time kissing the asses of public services than actually holding them to account. They can't even enforce their own rulings when the public service ACCEPTED THE RULING!
I condemn the national policy on complaints brought in under shona robison and overseen by Jeane - Oh yes! This complaint has survived two health secretaries and is about to move to a third.
I condemn the fact that my health is suffering serious detriment because a policy that was supposed to deliver "accountability, openness, transparency" etc is well.......shit!
I consider this matter, no longer to be one of discrimination, nor of medical malpractice - I consider it to be one now of self-defence. Which means the rules change.
And I will also say that I don't need to prove the matters raised in the correspondence I will release publicly, because 70% of them were confirmed by the NEC Deanery and the GMC three months after I raised them.
For those reading this, this is what someone at their witts end who has tried to actually give cover to the health secretary looks like. Well those days are over folks.
I have formally called on parliament through petition (wit over 150 signatories) to commence an investigation into the efficacy of the SPSO. Next will be into the efficacy of the NHS CHP under Jeane Freeman. The SPSO petition will be submitted after the may election.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin J Keatings SNP 1 | AFI 2

Martin J Keatings SNP 1 | AFI 2 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinJKeatings

7 Mar
Do you ever get the impression that when Johnson decides on cabinet members he asks if they have any experience and the response is:

Well gosh! No! But I'm willing to give it a bash!
The cabinet of government should be treated like the board of a multi-national company (no! not filled with cronnies) in my view along the lines of some advice a good friend of mine (who is CEO of a multi-national) once told me.
He said to me, that the job of a CEO is not to know everything about the company. It is to be a generalist and look at the big picture. This is why there are other directors. It is the job of directors to be specialised in the departments they oversee and then give...
Read 7 tweets
7 Mar
Something I am seeing with regularity now is "I'm voting SNP 1/2 in the hope that they MIGHT get a majority". This statement genuinely knocks the wind out of me, and let me be clear, I am not criticising the people saying it. I'm criticising the PR guys at the SNP for...
...perpetuating the myth when they know that SNP1/2 just does not work.

And many will say: "but martin, the reason the SNP lost a majority in 2016 was that people didn't all vote SNP in both lists"...and that I am afraid to say is also false.
The reason the SNP didn't get a majority in 2016 was because of the 2014 referendum and because the ass has fallen out of labour in Scotland. (No! I am not kidding).
Read 34 tweets
5 Mar
For the second time in my life, I find myself having to choose between abandoning a case or to turn and fight. This case, however, has much higher stakes. My life. Unfortunately, it seems the counsel I had to hire in this case (on contingency) doesn't have the ability...
...to see it through. Being a carer, hiring a lawyer on retainer is a no-go, and the costs of doing so would far exceed the sum sought (which is the cost of a surgery which was denied due to discrimination - a mere £12K which would actually save the taxpayer hundreds...
...of thousands over the long run). Ergo, the choice I have to make is to fight it myself personally, vs Yet again, the full force of the public purse. Or to have a shortened lifespan. Not much of a choice here really.
Read 6 tweets
4 Mar
Current figures show that SNP likely to take Willie Rennies seat in constituency ballot in Mid-Scotland and Fife - this means SNP to be 10 times more penalised than the other parties (rather than 9 times more) than the other parties.
It does not matter which maths you use for Mid-Scotland and Fife, the SNP will get zero seats on the regional ballot. They get 120K votes and would need at least (with 9 seats in the constituency) 46000 extra votes just to get 1 regional list seat.
That goes up to nearly 60K extra votes for one single seat in Mid-Scotland and Fife if they also take rennies seat in the constituency.

So! It's almost a mathematical certainty that the 120K votes in the regional list in MSF will be entirely wasted.
Read 7 tweets
4 Mar
I note the 9 SNP supporters who have hit unfollow with respect to my disparaging remarks regarding the health secretary. Fair enough. But when you or one of your family members becomes a victim of said policy and it damages their health. Look back and remember -
You had the opportunity to actually call out a bad policy that allows such things to happen and you chose instead to turn away from it. That's on you, but I am through holding my words on this.
It would not be so bad, were it not for the fact that this is not an isolated incident. You only need look at the review sites of the SPSO and you will see how bad it is. It is therefore in the interests of your party to fix this deficient policy before it truly backfires.
Read 5 tweets
4 Mar
Just to clarify here for everyone that reads this thread. 4 years I have been patient on this. And trust me, if I wanted to be a dick, I could easily release documents which would make very uncomfortable reading for the Health Secretary, but I haven't. But it's coming!
But the long and short of it (and many followers have seen this develop over the years) is that on 9th Feb 2017 I was denied remedial surgery to fix issue caused by NHS Fife's consistent failures over a decade. This ended up with the SPSO who took 2 years to investigate...
They released their final report on 2nd May 2019 and told NHS Fife to comply with the ruling by 28th June 2019. It is now 4 years (9th Feb 2021) since the initial complaint and despite NHS Fife agreeing with the ruling they have still not complied with the SPSO.
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!