Is ebay really banning listings of the PROBLEMATIC Dr. Seuss books?
I can see the book he tried to sell listed on ebay so I'm not sure why it would get flagged (he says he used the ISBN number, so maybe that's how).
Looking now, "And To Think I Saw It On Mulberry Street" has many different ISBNs depending on which edition it is. If ebay only plugged some of them into the algo, that would mean only specific versions would get auto-flagged.
Another example. The person in the original post is forwarding me his ebay email and I am also going to check against his specific ISBN. I'm on the case.
Note that both emails from ebay in both examples contain the same wording.
Again my working assumption is that @ebay is flagging these using ISBNs, and since these books have many editions, some ISBNs, or listings that don't mention them at all, won't get flagged.
I can't figure out what happened, but @AUChizad forwarded me an email he got cancelling his bid on another Dr. Seuss book, that appears to have been nuked from the site as well. So that's the third example I see of this today.
Here it is. Clicking on the link won't let me view the listing. It just says it ended. Trying to view original item doesn't work either. I'm not a frequent ebay user so I don't know if this is standard for sales that ended.
It looks like ebay doesn't recognize hyphenated ISBN numbers so it couldn't have been that.
Oh man was this thread from yesterday relevant.
Some posts about it on the ebay forums. Note the OP isn't some account that popped out of nowhere. Has over 500 feedback. community.ebay.com/t5/Selling/Dr-…
Doing some Twitter searches and I see at least two more examples of people tweeting about their Seuss listings getting pulled. Unless everyone is either copycatting or colluding, this is a thing that's actually happening.
I have a new theory based on some questions - I think these are posts that contain the actual images that were deemed problematic and led to the books being pulled. I still don't see the justification of you can sell books with swastikas on the cover.
Here's a screenshot of the original listing in question. As you see, one of the images is of the PROBLEMATIC page. you're not going to convince me that's a legitimate reason to pull a listing.
Anyway, I seem to be the only one so far who actually checked this properly, and this is my final conclusion: It's likely postings that include the specific images that caused the controversy to begin with, even if they are presented to show the item's condition/completeness.
I will be accepting apologies in the replies to this tweet.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Noam Blum

Noam Blum Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @neontaster

3 Mar
The republican grifter obsession with cancel culture is bad, but another bad trend is that nobody defends these decisions anymore. The argument now is universally "you care about small things that don't matter" and I don't accept that. This stuff always starts from the bottom.
Also the problem isn't the changing of Mr. Potato Head or the removal of some Dr. Seuss books. The problem is when people start getting in trouble for letting their kids play with a Mr. Potato head or bring a problematic Dr. Seuss book to school. THAT'S where things are headed.
Josh Hawley losing a book deal over things he himself did as a public official is not cancel culture. Someone getting fired or shunned or shamed on social media for reading Josh Hawley's book is cancel culture and that shit absolutely happens.
Read 4 tweets
1 Mar
My dude had a yearlong global pandemic where the world essentially shut down and he still didn't do it. And he kept promising, too.
Look at the date on this. LOOK AT IT.
Read 4 tweets
26 Feb
Finally getting around to this. It's very nice. Packs a wide punch in the "mid" area of the palate (not too deep, not too bright). Has a really long tail and a complex aftertaste. Image
A thing I've noticed about 100+ proof bourbons is that the really good ones can mask how high the proof is with the flavor. Cheapo high-proof whiskey just tastes like Everclear that had oak chips soaking in it.
I still have my Elijah Craig barrel proof B520, which is 127 proof, that I haven't opened yet. That will be its ultimate test, but the small batch EC is such a flavor bomb that I feel like it'll pass this test easily.
Read 5 tweets
23 Feb
For fuck's sake - tell people the ways in which their lives will improve after they get vaccinated, not the ways in which their lives will stay exactly the same. What the hell is wrong with your brains???
I guarantee that these recommendations will include more things that people CAN'T do than things they CAN.
It obviously makes sense to tell vaccinated people to keep following local safety regulations because there's no way to tell who is or isn't vaccinated, but the focus should be that getting vaccinated should make you feel way more confident about neither getting it nor giving it.
Read 5 tweets
23 Feb
I think the two main factors driving covid pessimism and gaslighting are:
1. An attempt to scare people into being cautious; and
2. The fear of the political toll of optimism that'll turn out to have been misplaced. Misplaced pessimism isn't as politically risky.
Trying to scare people is backfiring horribly because they keep preaching more severe measures (like double masking) when things are objectively improving with repeated good news regarding vaccines. It's creating a dissonance that ends up backfiring.
I see a tweet that says "new study shows vaccine reduces transmission risk 90%" and the very next tweet is "health officials say don't change any behaviors after getting vaccinated." It's getting really nutty at this point.
Read 4 tweets
21 Feb
"Wow, that's not good but we're still flying normally and this is a Boeing 777, which is designed to fly using only one engine in a pinch, so we're probably going in for an emergency landing and this will most likely just be a cool story I tell people later."
Here's the thing about modern aviation - don't worry about how bad something looks. Worry about how bad something feels. If the engine is on fire but the plane is still flying normally, that's less scary than no engines on fire and the plane bucking and doing steep banks.
Over the ocean this situation would have scared me for sure. It being not long after takeoff and you being able to safely turn around and land is a big factor.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!