1. BTW- this phenomena that @davidshor finds in his work, about non-white conservative voter "slippage"- the slippage is all from these voters being targeted for the first time w messaging (persuasion messaging from the Death Star). Effective lies.

No one would believe this
2. could pay dividends, bc "digital ads don't do anything." But when you have Black & Latino voters who have never been targeted bc they are reliable voters & all the sudden they are getting these "law & order" ads from the Trump campaign...

Proof is in your own data. If Trump
3. campaign had used abortion as their big issue (& they may well have if the Dem socialists weren't dumb enough to come up w something as god awful as "defund the police" then your non-white conservatives who went Clinton-Trump would be pinging off of THAT issue. Its not an
4. accident that its law & order. 2020 was the prototype- it was the toe dip. Now that they know "persuasion" can work w non-white voters (also, go look at your data, there's likely an education effect underlying this too) they are going to bring the heat in 2022 & spend massive
5. amounts on digital persuasion of nonwhites voters. If the D's don't completely change how they do their own targeting they are going to get run over. And although Shor is right that college edu whites, esp the young ones are way more liberal than their non-white counterparts
6. his analysis commits the same fallacy as so many diagnostics do. BC here's the issue. The issue isn't radicalism in the D party, esp not relative to R Party. The issue is perceptional. Bc here is an analysis talking about how the D Party is "too liberal" for a set of non-white
7. voters in their coalition at the very same time the other party is hosting a president so anti-American he tried to pull off an insurrection and end democracy in America. Once again, its a messaging problem. So long as Ds allow Rs to set the terms of the messaging stage- they
8. will have this problem. So long as they set their campaign narrative up around micro-issues and not major thematic issues that plague the GOP, that draw out the worst aspects of the modern Republican Party and disqualify it from holding power, they will lose. THAT is the
9. diagnostic the party needs. Put simply, they are losing races they should win bc the GOP is running propaganda, misinformation, disinformation no holds barred warfare campaigns against them & Ds want to wish themselves into a world where it will all just go away. Where they
10. campaign on principles and ideas. Where HR 1 passes bc it enables more people to vote. Where COVID aid occurs under a D president & not just under Republicans ones. But we do not live in that world anymore and haven't for so long now that the forces of good are so diminished
11. that one or two more bad election cycles for this party threatens to wipes the whole damn thing away. Look at McConnell these days, in the eyes, and you'll see a man who knows he went too far. Ds must fight the GOP's war, whether they want to or not. You see the massive jump
12. of college edu white +9pts my theory/research predicted starting back in 2017 and that's w/o competent messaging- that's bc that particular demo reads/watches the news and is hard to gaslight. And what Trump & now the whole of the GOP are doing freaked them out! But somewhere
13. out there in GOP world, someone like me got a crazy idea of microtargeting non-white voters w the socialism stuff (for Latinos) and defund the police and I am SURE there were naysayers who said, you can't get Black voter to vote for Trump. Well bullshit you can't. And if we
14. don't answer the GOP's "socialism" w messaging that is focused on the GOP's extremism, refusal to pass policy, shitty governance & the GOP's white supremacy issues & instead try to talk about health care or whatever we will lose. nymag.com/intelligencer/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rachel "The Doc" Bitecofer 📈🔭🍌

Rachel

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RachelBitecofer

5 Mar
1. The diagnostic from @jonallendc & @amieparnes (& I'll be careful here, I'm only just now hearing an int w them- haven't read book yet) is "Lucky" which is 100% correct in terms of the primary. But in terms of the fall general- as they talking about- what helped @JoeBiden win
2. was discipline- which is the exact opposite of what he was supposed to be capable of. BC everything is so off the guardrails w the GOP trying to overturn a legit election & end democracy, we've not had many of the normal convos we usually have, the usual post-ops. But Biden
3. was unshakable and turned in a performance of a lifetime. Taking Parnes & Allen's reporting at face value, that Obama was worried Biden would lose & hurt his legacy (which to me sounds off, I am sure Obama has been worried about bigger things, as many of us have been) Biden
Read 8 tweets
5 Mar
1. Negative Partisanship Rules All.

@AlanIAbramowitz & @stevenwwebster 1st applied this concept to American political behavior in their polarization research after Alan spent a decade needlessly proving that the mass public was, indeed, polarizing & not just "sorting." I used
2. it to argue that our sorted, polarized, and hyperpartisan electorate, where party-preference, including the lean of most Indies, predicts vote choice mths out from election day. Therefore, our elections have become highly predictable- look for demographics for each party's
3. emerging coalition, know where they will win & lose. Fir Ds this meant places w concentrations of college edu voters (IE the suburbs) were about to explode in favor of Ds, some from preference changes but also from turnout change among Ds & Indies who had been latent in the
Read 10 tweets
3 Mar
1. Correct Dan. I will spend the next 10 months, as Ds considers nominees for races in places like PA, reminding folks that when change finally came to the Deep South it came in the form of REALIGNMENT. W the D's NEW COALITION. Which includes the PERMANENT REALIGNMENT of college
2. whites, bc the "preference change" wasn't a preference change entirely. A LARGE COMPONENT of it was a participation change. It was millennial & Zoomer college edu voters doing the oppo of what the COOL Boomers did in the 60s. Cool Boomers- the ones that aged and vote D & hated
3. Bush & still smoke pot & created quality over quantity industries in wine, beer, cheese, pot, basically everything that doesn't suck about this country other than @CFTalk- THAT may well be the ONLY think Republicans ever did for the country that actually was value added) so
Read 14 tweets
3 Mar
1. Couldn't have said it better myself. When I 1st emerged I was teaching at a little liberal arts college. Regardless, @neeratanden immediately treated me w respect even though she didn't really jive on my thesis (esp. strawman version some people use for it)

Its easy to agree
2. to meet someone you really like, or really jive w. Its harder when its someone, esp a woman, fighting hard to find a spot in a competitive frankly brutal environ. She had every opp to shun me & instead, she treated me as an equal- as someone who deserved a seat at the table.
3. I will always be grateful for that & when I found out that Manchin was going to abuse his power to rob her of this opp, I got pissed. Bc I know that if her name was Bob, if she was some white dude w half the qualifications, she'd be leading the OMB. All I can say is @JoeBiden
Read 6 tweets
3 Mar
1. I'm so excited that the GOP is dusting off their "the Dem Party has abandoned the working class" talking point.

They've never pulled this out & gotten obliterated before, which, if I get my way, will be what happens this time.

That is, of course, there is no party that
2. shits on the "working class" more than the Republican Party. Also, the middle class. And there's a nice long list of all the shit that Ds have done for working class/middle class American- & guess what? Reps voted no on virtually every single one of them.

SO- D candidates
3. incumbents will be sent out there with a nice long list of "what have you done for me lately" to credit claim for the bottom 90% that simultaneously indicts the GOP for "you have totally screwed me over." I think about all the time the 1st time one of these GOPers get to see
Read 4 tweets
2 Mar
1. Yep & no one's buying Abbot is stupid. I'm sure some Ds tell themselves this. But he's not. Nor is Cruz, or Paxton. They're not dumb. They know EXACTLY what they're doing. AND Reps, SO DO YOU. You're not fooling us. We know you're not dumb either.

You're killing people
2. I'm sure you prefer to go through your days w your little bubbles intact, w no one w balls big enough (or free of jobs anyway) to be able to call your sorry asses out. But I can. And I will

You're killing people. And you stopped caring once the data told you it was minorities
3. Now you just want to do your think and don't give 2 fucks that some Black friends of mine know 3, 4, hell 6 people that have died of COVID. Meanwhile you know 0 & want your nails done & a beer at the bar so you hide behind the needs of business who should have been subsidized
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!