Language was invented so humans could communicate by evoking shared and repeatable real experiences.
We've now come to a point where media, politicians, academia, and all manner of influential people are using language mostly to obfuscate human experiences to impose a viewpoint.
We've now come to a point where media, politicians, academia, and all manner of influential people are using language mostly to obfuscate human experiences to impose a viewpoint.
Nothing that is reported as 'news' any longer represents what actually happened. It only represents what the news media wants you to think happened. Maybe the news business was always this way, but it seems it used to have higher standards to avoid blatant and crass manipulation.
Note the obfuscation on Capitol riot of January 6. 
So much for the "armed" part of the "armed insurrection" -- a description of the riot used in newspapers, websites, and cable news transcripts 2,339 times since Jan 6.
The "one lady" was the rioter Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a bullet fired by a Capitol Police officer.
The "one lady" was the rioter Ashli Babbitt, who was killed by a bullet fired by a Capitol Police officer.
And some more perspective on the January 6 so-called "armed insurrection."
I wonder what a similar hearing about the arsons and murders of last summer might reveal. Democratic leaders and the media were unperturbed, if not downright elated, about those. What deceitful snakes!
I wonder what a similar hearing about the arsons and murders of last summer might reveal. Democratic leaders and the media were unperturbed, if not downright elated, about those. What deceitful snakes!
The above excerpts are from this article by Byron York.
washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/byron-…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
