My favorite Russell Wilson comp is Fran Tarkenton for a number of reasons. Stylistically they were so similar. Primarily pocket passers but with fantastic wheels. Running for their lives behind bad lines, mostly playing with meh receivers. Excelled early, super durable.
Through age 32, Wilson has played 144 games. Tarkenton had 167, mostly because he started at 21 (which was absolutely unheard of).

Russell Wilson's ANY/A+ (era-adjusted ANY/A) is 112. Frank Tarkenton's was... an identical 112.

Wilson: 33,946 passing
Tarkenton: 31,135 passing
Wilson: 803/4506/21 rushing
Tarkenton: 531/3195/25 rushing

Tarkenton is the most-sacked QB in history. Wilson has a shot at that mark if he can stay healthy long enough. The two are just so similar across so many different dimensions.
Here's the thing, though. *AFTER* age 32, Tarkenton played 6 more years, made 3 more pro bowls, and was a league MVP.

He retired with the career passing yardage record. He held that record longer than any other quarterback in history. He's *clearly* a better QB than Wilson.
More impressively (for me), Tarkenton killed it on two different teams (three, really, if you count his two Minnesota stints separately). He's one of the best entanglement-busters at quarterback.
Now how many of you would consider Tarkenton a Top 5 quarterback of all time? How many would have him Top 10? (I flirt with him in my Top 5 from time to time and always have him in my Top 10, but I know most tend to be lower on him than me.)
Give Wilson another 6 years like Fran Tarkenton's last 6 and maybe he enters the Top 10 all-time discussion. But at this point, that's wildly premature. Tarkenton led the league in passing yards at age 38 back when that was just something quarterbacks didn't really do.
I don't think Wilson is far out of the Top 20. Another couple strong seasons might get him there for me.

He's a ways out of the Top 10. And I don't see a legit path to the Top 5 unless he *really* turns things on over the last ~third of his career.
Also when talking about Tarkenton you gotta mention the degree of difficulty at the start of his career.

He was the only guy in NFL history to throw 200+ passes at age 21 until Drew Bledsoe in 1993. (Though George Ratterman also did it in the AAFC.) Unheard of.
He did this for the 1961 Minnesota Vikings, an expansion franchise.

Remember David Carr with the expansion Texans? He averaged 3.53 sacks per start over his first four seasons. Tarkenton with the expansion Vikings? 3.47 sacks per start over his first four seasons. Got clobbered.
(Tark had some games where he came off the bench and he undoubtedly got sacked in some of those, so his sacks per game was undoubtedly lower, but nevertheless, he endured a near-David Carr level of abuse as a 21-year-old rookie for an expansion franchise.)
(Whenever someone opines that David Carr sucked because he got beat up so much I remember guys like Tarkenton and Randall Cunningham getting thrown into the fire just as much and emerging as stars and wonder if maybe David Carr just wasn't a good QB.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Harstad

Adam Harstad Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamHarstad

6 Mar
Volume is not more important than efficiency. Most of the time, volume *is* efficiency.

See also: Harstad’s Razor. (I’m never going to stop trying to make this happen.)

Toy model. Imagine NBA players see 5 “amazing looks” per game, shots that the average player shoots 60% on.

And they see 5 “good looks” (50%) and 5 “okay looks” (40%) and they see as many bad looks (30%) as they want to take.
Read 18 tweets
3 Feb
One thing I love to do with Dan's monthly dynasty value charts is track the change in my players' values over time. Most of my roster management decisions are aimed at making sure that number keeps going up. If I succeed, I'm going to win a lot of championships as a byproduct!
Some might protest that value isn't points. True! But if value doesn't eventually translate into points, it goes down and you've failed your "keep going up" goal.

Over long timelines it's impossible for your roster to keep getting more valuable without resulting in lots of wins.
I'd also argue that approaching dynasty with the mindset that value is the primary target and wins are a lagging indicator of your success in hitting that target results in healthier, more competitive teams than just chasing wins outright.
Read 12 tweets
3 Feb
So the two that immediately come to mind are Unitas / Berry / Moore and Manning / Harrison / Wayne. The first trio especially because Moore was just so versatile.

But as a dark horse pick, how about Daryle Lamonica / Fred Biletnikoff / Warren Wells?
You’re probably familiar with Hall of Famer Biletnikoff. And Lamonica, “the Mad Bomber”, was in many ways the proto-Mahomes. Just zero football conscience, never saw a deep window he wasn’t going to try to fit a ball into. Paired with an uncanny ability to elude pressure.
Wells would be the relative unknown in this group.

In 1969, he led the AFL in receiving yards with 1260 and in receiving TDs with 14 (in 14 games, remember).

He only caught 47 passes that year. That’s 26.8 yards per reception.

Tyreek Hill, eat your heart out.
Read 4 tweets
1 Feb
Do you just really need a guy in your corner right now? Because I can totally be your guy in the corner. My mentions are always open. If you feel embarrassed, my DMs are open, too. Nobody in there but me.

I might not be able to help. But it certainly can't hurt.

Standing offer.
I've had some offer to chip in a few bucks for help. I appreciate the sentiment, but all help is free. I help because I want to help!

Moreover, my family has been doing fine. But many others have not. If you do feel moved to give, here's a worthy cause:
chicagohomeless.org
Also: I love the English language. I love words. I use a lot of them. (You might have noticed.) I'm not trying to sound like a snob or anything, I just really like words!

If you want a word of the day today, here's my all-time favorite: Reciprocity
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reciproci… Image
Read 5 tweets
18 Nov 20
Five and a half years ago, I live-tweeted a dynasty rankings update. It was fun, and it's cool to have a historical archive of my thought process at the time. I think it holds up pretty well.

QBs: wakelet.com/wake/ce4738c2-…
RBs: wakelet.com/wake/6ecb9082-…
WRs: wakelet.com/wake/a552e78d-…
I find myself with 30 minutes to kill and kind of wanted to hammer out my WR rankings. Stream-of-consciousness style. Don't know how deep I'll go but I think the position is interesting and talking it out will be clarifying.

Feel free to mute me in advance.
WR1 - DK Metcalf
WR2 - AJ Brown

Easiest calls. I could be tempted to go contrarian with Brown over Metcalf, but Metcalf's higher market value gives you a lot more flexibility if you decide to trade one for a king's ransom.

Either way: crazy young, crazy good, super productive.
Read 30 tweets
17 Nov 20
Want to expand on this. The trade is *NOT* me trying to get out on CMC while the getting is good. He's still my #1 rated player in all of dynasty!
I have fantasy value for every player back to 1985. McCaffrey has the most fantasy value of any running back through age 23.

Among retired players, 11 of the top 12 had more fantasy value *AFTER* age 23. Usually much more. I don't think his value is even half-gone yet.
(The lone exception was Clinton Portis, who added 472 points over a waiver-wire replacement through age 23, then 412 points over a waiver-wire replacement after.)
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!