Now, these numbers include only documentary qualified applicants and ONLY in the IR and family priority categories. It does not include the EB and DV cases. Adding the cases in the pipeline at NVC that are not yet DQed, we are looking at ~1Million cases!
JFC!
Now the same report provides latest stats in another critical category: visa interviews conducted. Get this!
In the month of January 2021 DOS conducted TOTAL of
* 8,273 interviews for all immediate relative IV categories
* 262 interviews for all family preference IV categories
262, YES! 262 TOTAL interviews for family preference IV out of ~300K documentary qualified applicants and if memory serves this time period covers the Young plaintiffs (case handled by @curtisatlaw & team)
I'm not sure but this report appears to include in these IR numbers (K-1/K-2) and if so the numbers for true IV is even grimmer, as in Jan '21 DOS issued 2091 fiance visas.
But back to numbers. According to the report grand total of 8,535 interviews in IR & Family priority categories. A truly outrageous number but there is more bad news. When govt reports "interviews" and "cases" in the visa context they are not talking actual visa issued but units
Based on prior reports (of course, DOS stats are as opaque as mud) it looks to me that only about 165 family priority "interviews" resulted in visa grants for a total of about 302 Fam priority visas in Jan.
According to official stats for January 2021 DOS issued total of 11,880 immigrant visas in ALL immigrant categories.
I have been delaying reading the #FOIA case from SCOTUS from 3-4. So nothing like spending your Sunday morning reading a decision you know is going to f*ck up a lot of your pending litigation & heck! Admin law practice as a whole, right? Well I did and shiiish a 🧵
Here is the link to the FWS v Sierra Club case supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf…
and yes! it is all about exemption 5 & specifically the deliberative process privilege. If you’ve done any immigration related FOIA, this is your “b5” stamped on blackouts on ~ 85% of the docs you received.
In her 1st dec ACB provides a map for agencies to hide their activities:
“It is not always self-evident whether a doc represents an agency’s final decision, but one thing is clear: A doc is not final solely because nothing else follows it. Sometimes a proposal dies on the vine”
The Senate passed the $1.9 trillion #AmericanRescuePlan but with very few provisions applicable to mixed-status families and undocumented non-citizens. Yes, the appalling Ted Cruz amendment was defeated but little headway appears to have been made to provide relief to the ...
... hundreds of thousands of undocumented essential workers who since day one of the pandemic have kept us fed and provided for. This is a shameful failure.
This bill is a monster but it seems like the "premium assistance credit" for ACA bene were limited yet again to
... non-citizens "lawfully present" even if not eligible for Medicaid under T XIX.
For purposes of $1400 checks, for mixed-status families only one SSN will be sufficient, leaving millions of undocumented individuals out.
#PP10014 is gone and the period for DOS to review & adjust any implementation, guidance, etc arising from the awful #entryban was supposed to have been completed. I have not seen anything specific posted but KCC has made some improvements - MOSTLY SYMBOLIC- but 🧵
... to show good faith they have processed some #DV2021 cases and interviews may be coming for as early as April but the number of interviews will be minuscule. It appears that the shift has been made to process family-based backlog and clear the deck for those cases.
There appears to be little desire from DOS to rescind the COVID19 regional bans or to open consulates for routine services. And as it is going now, they are not likely to rescind PP10052 but to let it run until end of March.
Ooof. 1st Cir finds that in civil action, "warrantless electronic device searches are essential to the border search exception's purpose of ensuring that the exec branch can adequately protect the border" and no prb cause needed to search ED at border ... media.ca1.uscourts.gov/pdf.opinions/2…
Although after Riley, crim cases have gone this direction, this was a civil w USC & LPR plaintiffs and covered "basic" & "advanced" searches under the CBP search guidances.
But in this one, the 1st held that "Basic" CBP searches of ED may be performed without reasonable suspicion. Conclusion using the ol' "routine"/"non-routine" search distinction. THIS IS REALLY BAD!
OMG! President Biden has now TERMINATED the national emergency decl on the southern border, clearing the way for the repeal of CDC Title 42 expulsion order.
Whoooo. 1st "blanket" NIE for the EU COVID-19 entry bans: "those applicants who are found to be otherwise qualified for an F-1 or M-1 visa will automatically be considered for a national interest exception to travel." travel.state.gov/content/travel…
This could be encouraging, #noban tweeps!!! All that @TravelGov need to do is POST one of these bloody notices and #DV2020VisaHolders with valid visas will have their dreams turn to reality!
Let's do this, DOS!
First time I have seen F/M being able to be scheduled in most European consulates. Major improvement on some of the exempted NIVs also. #NoBan