While countries like in the @EU_Commission have in the last decade tried to placate China in order to do business and thus let their guard down, the Chinese regime has been gradually building up its strength and rallying other regimes to strengthen authoritarianism.
If this continues, democracy will be confined to a small group of countries in the @EU_Commission and a few others, and will face political and economic threats from authoritarian regimes which will work together to sideline democracies.
As it is, China and Myanmar are taking advantage of international paralysis at the @UN, @EU_Commission, @StateDept and others to persecute citizens, Hong Kong, Uyghurs etc. And democracies are at a loss at what to do after having surrendered their power for decades.
Even Singapore, the darling of @EU_Commission countries for its 'soft' authoritarian approach, is also being embolden by regional authoritarian regimes like China. Independent media @NewNaratif founder @pjthum was suddenly hauled to the police station for investigations today.
Democracies like those in the @EU_Commission, @CanadaFP and @StateDept need to reflect on how serious they are in this democracy business, and how they are willing to protect its development. Should we only protect democracy in our own countries and give up that of others?
Should democracies continue to perpetuate inequality internally & thus discrimination by allowing neoliberal capitalism to split their societies apart, and allow big businesses to lobby for capital power, thereby weakening communities, and thereby eroding democratic development?
At this very important juncture in human history, we need to ask very important questions while democracies like @EU_Commission still have the economic power to make a stand. If we believe democracy is good for humanity, what strategies do we need to develop now to contain China?
Do we believe we can avoid war by placating authoritarian regimes, or are we actually emboldening them, pushing the problem down the road, allowing them to organize and collectively resist democracy very soon? What effective ways can we develop to contain authoritarian China?
How do we prevent China from buying over interests in developing countries? How should democracies like @EU_Commission and @StateDept truly invest in sustainable growth and participatory development in developing countries with an aim to empower their citizens, ...
... so that citizens in developing countries can be empowered in transparent and accountable manners, and be able to resist the spread of authoritarianism? Democracies like @EU_Commission now need to take foreign relations in supporting democracy seriously.
China has tried to buy over allegiances and reduce support of developing countries toward democracies. One strategy should be to stop China’s influence by raising awareness of the pitfalls of China's 'aid' & to coordinate among democracies like @EU_Commission to reinvest in ...
... supporting developing countries with an aim to build trust & empower citizens. This might mean democracies asking some hard questions, about whether discriminatory attitudes are still taken toward developing countries, whether democratic development is being curtailed ...
... by neoliberal and crony capitalistic practices within democracies themselves, so that the foundations of democratic development can be strengthened globally. I think if democracies take a step out of their comfort zones and actually look at developments elsewhere, ...
... the question is whether with current economic globalization, whether democracies can protect their own contained democratic development while the rest of the world sink further into authoritarianism? I don't quite think democracies can exist in their bubble.
There needs to be stronger action to stop the military coup in Myanmar are to contain CCP, if anything, to protect the national security interests of democracies.
Democracies like @EU_Commission and @StateDept need to acknowledge that if they allow neoliberalism or inequality or whatsoever to allow their democratic credibility to decline, that this emboldens the development of authoritarianism, and weakens global security.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Myanmar's military is cracking down on citizens. I'm joining a global campaign to support Myanmar's democracy. Please take a photo with a three finger salute and hashtag #SolidarityWithMyanmar. Let's join in to protect our democracies.
Myanmar's military coup regime has zero legitimacy. The whole country has risen up against the military, but the military is using violence to command obedience. We cannot let the military win. Myanmar is at the vanguard of our fight for democracy. Let's support their citizens.
We have seen democracy regress in HK, Thailand, Malaysia, India. It's retreating in East Europe/South America. Authoritarianism has sunk its roots in Cambodia, Laos. Myanmar's military coup has zero legitimacy. Let's stand with Myanmar to resist the global threat to democracy.
I thought you are a UN-recognized human rights defender, my colleague mocked me. Then why didn't you speak up for us, she said. At the Taiwanese work place, hierarchy is steep and workers do not challenge bosses, for fear of losing their jobs or being scolded.
When my boss took my writings and put his name on it while omitting my name, I kept quiet. While our admin manager said that if we do did not follow the leave application procedures twice, she will deduct our bonuses, I kept quiet. We all kept quiet, because we feel powerless.
Taiwan is a democracy, but its workplaces are still authoritarian. When I finally gave my resignation letter just before lunar new year, my director told me - not everything can be democratic. As you grow older, you will become more authoritarian, he said. And this is in Taiwan.
The next 5 to 10, or 15 years of Taiwan's transition might be very important. China is expected to build up its capabilities to start a war, while some countries, like in Europe, are aiming to be able to manufacture leading-edge processor chips by then to compete with Taiwan's...
... semiconductor industry. This means it can no longer be business as usual for Taiwan. There's a need to review whether Taiwan's current economic model and the 5 shortages rhetoric (lack of land, water, power, manpower, and talent) contradicts with its national goals.
The 5 shortages are already irrelevant for the major export companies, which are paying higher salaries for tech talent and where youths flock to them, while their high profits can sustain increases to the costs of land, energy & water. 5 shortages should therefore be downplayed.
The whole of Myanmar is out in force today for the Burma Revolution to protest against the military coup and demand it moves aside. Threading photos from @cvdom2021 to show the scale.
This is so touching. A person in Myanmar opens up about how he felt his silence previously made him "complicit in the genocide of Rohingya" and how recent protests have opened his eyes, and how he vows never to make the same mistake again.
The thing is, the unity in Myanmar today is allowing people to have greater empathy and solidarity with one another, it has helped to remove barriers and strengthen relationships and unity, and like I wanted with the HK protests, I want people in Myanmar to win too.
Because these social movements have such a power to transform societies and move them to another level, and if their governments are wise, it's such a powerful energy to rally, to build society, and to give people new hope and progress.
In our research, Taiwanese say innovation is poor in Taiwan because the government tends to invest in big companies or companies which are already innovating and they want to make a quick buck from, and tend not to invest in SMEs. The quality of innovation is also ...
... not monitored, leading to companies reporting on good outcomes on paper but with many so-called innovations not being followed up on, or not real. Research funds are also given due to 關係 (guanxi), resulting in younger/returning Taiwanese not getting research funds.
There's of course the usual issues of Taiwan's low salary, a lack of educational reforms, which therefore means the low wages results in subpar quality work, and the system gets stuck. A culture therefore develops where Taiwanese workers do not question the system, ...