If SARS2 came from a lab, that lab may not have known about it (for a while).
When SARS leaked multiple times from a lab in Beijing, it wasn’t till a month later when people died that they detected the lab escape, 1000+ quarantined, investigators didn’t know how this happened.
The ease of catching SARS2 in the lab (even when you don’t work with covid patient samples or the virus) is one reason why employees in hospital-affiliated buildings are among the first to be vaccinated.
And with a virus like SARS2 that produces any of a variety of symptoms (if any) among young people (lab workers tend to be younger, many fresh out of undergrad), with an incubation time of up to 2 weeks...
You’re dealing with a very strong lab leak contender.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Just listened to this interesting @nature podcast on COVID's origins and the 'lab leak' theory. First reaction is that it's very light on evidence and heavy on motive speculation.
One, in terms of evidence available to date, there's just as much evidence for a lab leak as there is for a natural spillover causing the current pandemic.
People speculating lab vs natural origins are either way building off zero definitive evidence.
Two, there's a weird myth going around that the WIV was built in Wuhan because it's a SARS spillover zone.
100% incorrect.
Wuhan city is NOT a SARS spillover zone. The human population there has even been used as a negative control in studies for human exposure to SARS viruses.
“based on what we know so far.. the W.H.O. investigation appears to be biased, skewed, and insufficient.. without full transparency and access to the primary data and records, we cannot understand the basis for any of the comments issued so far” nytimes.com/2021/03/04/hea…
... as @R_H_Ebright said, the open letter was released in anticipation of an interim report from the WHO-convened covid-19 origins study team. Our letter was communicated to high levels of @WHO on Tuesday, and we only heard this morning that no interim report is coming after all.
We can talk about the full report when it comes out but should not wait to call for global efforts as @FilippaLentzos described, possibly involving the U.N. General Assembly where all nations are represented and can vote on whether to formally investigate #OriginsofCOVID
The WHO-convened covid-19 origins study group is scrapping their overdue interim report amid "tensions between Beijing and Washington over the investigation and an appeal from one international group of scientists for a new probe." wsj.com/articles/who-i…
Many thanks to the experts & scientists who organized the open letter which is the basis of the @WSJ news story.
The letter describes limitations of the WHO-convened global study and what a credible investigation into COVID-19 origins should look like. s.wsj.net/public/resourc…
FYI journalists reporting on the @WHO convened COVID-19 origins collaborative process of discovery.
@DrTedros said it is not a WHO study or investigation.
It is an independent study by predominantly non-WHO experts. ~Half of the team is unidentified. who.int/publications/m…
The WHO-convened team had to work with Chinese counterparts (half of the team) in a collaborative process; they did not have investigatory powers to look into COVID-19 origin hypotheses that their hosts did not want them looking into.