“Cities are places of opportunity and cohesion, and people want to live there. Yet our planning and politics make this far too difficult. The COVID-19 pandemic is the moment to change that.” My piece @globeandmail: theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl… 1/
Cities aren’t dead. More of us should live there. 2/
Our society has experienced dramatic demographic changes, and planning policy isn’t catching up. 3/
In most places, apartment buildings are banned. 4/
Planning has shaped segregation by income, segregation by race, and the very health of our fellow citizens. 5/
Our current system does not, as some think, “protect” people’s neighbourhoods. It “protects” rich people’s neighbourhoods and pushes development elsewhere. This should be reversed. 7/
One final note (cc #housingtwitter): the argument that the development industry is running wild, building “a lot” of housing, etc, is often not supported by data. 8/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Crucial point about what's happening: big pools of capital are buying old (often decrepit) buildings and pushing hard for higher rents and new tenancies
This is totally different from *building* new housing, which is what developers often get called out for.
I write often about the need to add big new buildings in central Toronto. Why? Because privileged neighbourhoods like @HarbordVillage fight new growth relentlessly and shamelessly. 1/ #Topoli
This development would take an existing building, add on top, and create seven homes. Missing Middle.
Neighbours are fighting it like hell. 2/
This is part of a district ("University") that has 3,000 fewer people now than it did in 1971. Houses now sell there for $2-million. It will become a thinly populated gated community for rich people. 3/
Yes: rebuilding this short section would be very expensive. But there’s also half a neighbourhood at stake. 5.4 extra acres of land, and $500-million in city revenue. 2/
A design by Smart Density shows that with the “Boulevard” option, you could build more than 8,000 homes here, *and* a community centre and parkland. 3/
Fantastic analysis from data scientist Erik Drysdale: Much of Toronto is actually losing people. 56/140 neighbourhoods are smaller 2016 than in 1971. erikdrysdale.com/DA_kramer/?fbc… 1/
The #Topoli idea that Toronto is being overwhelmed by growth is, very simply, false. We have packed 100,000s of people into a handful of places while most of the city, geographically, has been flat or declining. 2/
We often hear that Yonge-Eglinton, a privileged neighbourhood, is overcrowded. In fact it has one tiny island of growth in sea of flat or declining population. 3/