Fantastic analysis from data scientist Erik Drysdale: Much of Toronto is actually losing people. 56/140 neighbourhoods are smaller 2016 than in 1971. erikdrysdale.com/DA_kramer/?fbc… 1/
The #Topoli idea that Toronto is being overwhelmed by growth is, very simply, false. We have packed 100,000s of people into a handful of places while most of the city, geographically, has been flat or declining. 2/
We often hear that Yonge-Eglinton, a privileged neighbourhood, is overcrowded. In fact it has one tiny island of growth in sea of flat or declining population. 3/
A responsible city planning policy -- or provincial planning policy -- would be setting hard and aggressive targets for pop. growth across large areas of the city. There is excess capacity of all kinds. 4/
This builds on research by Anna Kramer included in #housedividedto 5/
Yes: rebuilding this short section would be very expensive. But there’s also half a neighbourhood at stake. 5.4 extra acres of land, and $500-million in city revenue. 2/
A design by Smart Density shows that with the “Boulevard” option, you could build more than 8,000 homes here, *and* a community centre and parkland. 3/
These will include roughly 2000 apartments and, after years of delay, the developers plan to begin sales in 2022 2/
The design has evolved. The geometry of the buildings is more regular. The cladding now includes a linen finish stainless steel (similar to the Luna Arles tower) with a textured pattern 3/
@SquamishNation Retail and 6,000 bike parking spots below grade. Ground level largely green, entirely publicly accessible. 2/
@SquamishNation A new formal gateway will flank the Burrard bridge. @Khelsilem:“There’s a strong desire to express Squamish identity though the public realm and through the rest of the development.” 3/
RLT: In Toronto the city parking authority wants to take a new downtown park - which councillor @joe_cressy - has fought for - and put a three-level 144-space garage underneath it. No. toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2… #topoli 1/
Providing (subsidized) car parking – especially here in perhaps the most walkable place in the country - is not something government should be doing. Huge expense and carbon footprint. 2/
If the city climate policy means anything at all, this - building a large concrete structure to make it easier for people to drive - is a non-starter. 3/
Even if @PlanVancouver streamlines their policy, development remains wildly complex. Asking non-professionals to go through this for one or two units will never, ever generate meaningful change.
If the supremely knowledgeable @fabulavancouver trips over all these obstacles, how are thousands of ordinary homeowners supposed to navigate them?