Crucial point about what's happening: big pools of capital are buying old (often decrepit) buildings and pushing hard for higher rents and new tenancies
This is totally different from *building* new housing, which is what developers often get called out for.
Politically, these two things get confused. But they're opposite. Big landlords (including REITs) *benefit* from a housing shortage. Their strategy depends on it. As a bloc, they don't want looser zoning and more housing to be built.
In fact, today's strict Toronto zoning benefits big landlords. They own tower-in-the-park sites -- and it's legal to build new towers there. thestar.com/news/gta/2020/…
St. Jamestown, the densest neighbourhood in the country, is getting more towers. My neighbourhood is not. theglobeandmail.com/canada/toronto…
Ha, error in tweet above: The image was supposed to be a quote from @christinedobby’s story
One last note on above-guideline rent increases. These may be (as the story implies) used in illegitimate ways. But most of these 1950s-1970s rental buildings do need substantial updates and repairs.
“Cities are places of opportunity and cohesion, and people want to live there. Yet our planning and politics make this far too difficult. The COVID-19 pandemic is the moment to change that.” My piece @globeandmail: theglobeandmail.com/opinion/articl… 1/
Cities aren’t dead. More of us should live there. 2/
Our society has experienced dramatic demographic changes, and planning policy isn’t catching up. 3/
I write often about the need to add big new buildings in central Toronto. Why? Because privileged neighbourhoods like @HarbordVillage fight new growth relentlessly and shamelessly. 1/ #Topoli
This development would take an existing building, add on top, and create seven homes. Missing Middle.
Neighbours are fighting it like hell. 2/
This is part of a district ("University") that has 3,000 fewer people now than it did in 1971. Houses now sell there for $2-million. It will become a thinly populated gated community for rich people. 3/
Yes: rebuilding this short section would be very expensive. But there’s also half a neighbourhood at stake. 5.4 extra acres of land, and $500-million in city revenue. 2/
A design by Smart Density shows that with the “Boulevard” option, you could build more than 8,000 homes here, *and* a community centre and parkland. 3/
Fantastic analysis from data scientist Erik Drysdale: Much of Toronto is actually losing people. 56/140 neighbourhoods are smaller 2016 than in 1971. erikdrysdale.com/DA_kramer/?fbc… 1/
The #Topoli idea that Toronto is being overwhelmed by growth is, very simply, false. We have packed 100,000s of people into a handful of places while most of the city, geographically, has been flat or declining. 2/
We often hear that Yonge-Eglinton, a privileged neighbourhood, is overcrowded. In fact it has one tiny island of growth in sea of flat or declining population. 3/