#swfc How did the season end from here in the last 22 seasons?
Not many teams escape the bottom 3 in the last 12 matches.
Only 8 of 88 Play-Offs contestants have come from outside top 8 after 34 matches. Historically speaking it's a myth that everything is still up for grabs:
21st, Birmingham, are currently on course for 46 points at season's end. 18 points more than we have currently.
But the points won per game in the last 12 is for the bottom positions is higher than the first 34 matches - whereas it actually declines for the top positions:
50% of 21st positions have had points per game between 0.07 and 0.43 points per game higher in the last 12 than the first 34 matches.
For 21st this season it's a points per game in the last 12 matches between 1.07 and 1.43, meaning a finish of between 47 and 51 points.
That's also very close to the typical historical number of points won by 21st at season's end, where half of them have been with between 48 and 50 points:
To reach 48 points Wednesday would have to win another 20 points after today.
That *has* been done by teams in the bottom three before: 9 times in the last 22 seasons, including two last season:
20 points from 12 matches is 1.67 points per game, which is around what a team finishing 5th generally wins over a full season.
Winning 20 points will also be a tall order considering the fixture list for the run-in with only Millwall's run-in tougher than ours:
The gap to bridge is 7 points.
13 times have a team been 7 or more points adrift of 21st after 34 matches since 1998.
And, alas, none of them ultimately managed to survive relegation:
20 points would be 6 wins and 2 draws from the last 12, ie. no more than 4 losses.
We still have to play the current top 3 (Norwich, Watford, Swansea) and a trip to Oakwell with the form Barnsley is in looks ominous too.
Add Middlesbrough (A) and Cardiff (H), both still chasing the Play-Offs, and we're probably looking at these six being must win games for survival:
#swfc Derby's latest win over QPR leaves Wednesday six points adrift of 21st and safety with two matches in hand.
How have teams in those circumstances done in the previous 22 seasons?
[thread]
First off we have to equalise Derby's points tally to our number of matches.
If we use points won per game for everyone, and how many points that would give them after the same number of matches as us, 23, this is how the table would look:
A gap of 4, not 6, points.
After 23 matches, how often have teams been trailing 21st by 4 or more points?
24 times in the last 22 seasons.
Of those 24 teams just 4, 1 in 6, survived.
In their final 23 matches those 4 survivors won 27, 33, 35 and 40 points respectively:
#swfc I've done alright when researching things online in the past (it's also a not insignificant part of my job).
But just like in 2015, when Dejphon Chansiri bought our club, I am incapable of finding any evidence of his business experience as a CEO online.
(thread below)
Chansiri's older brother by 3 years, Thiraphong, runs the family business formed by his father.
Thiraphong's education (MBA from the US), business experience as a CEO and involvement in a great many businesses also outside the Thai Union Food Group, is easily retrievable online.
I really hope we use a similar ploy to when Luongo played a Libero role, as three centre backs can leave us too depleted further up the pitch against Wycombe's 4-2-3-1. The reason 3-5-2 went out of vogue in the early 2000s was precisely because teams turned to lone front men.
Three defenders in a line against one striker means space elsewhere for the attacking team.
So unless we tep it up, we'll be heavily outnumbered when we're on the ball, if Wycombe pad central areas like they did in their successful game against Watford: