Reducing use of cash bail & pretrial detention should be an easy place for bipartisan consensus. Smaller govt + less infringement on civil liberties + research-supported! I'll gladly talk w anyone who's curious about the evidence & tradeoffs. #txlege
For those requesting a reading list, here are a bunch of papers that cover the consequences of pretrial detention and cash bail, for those on the margin (that is, for those likely to be affected by policy changes):
"Distortion of Justice: How the Inability to Pay Bail Affects Case Outcomes" by @MeganTStevenson
"The Effects of Pretrial Detention on Conviction, Future Crime, and Employment: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges" by Will Dobbie, Jacob Goldin, and Crystal Yang
Note that whether to use cash bail & whom to detain pretrial are separate questions, and both are *also* separate from the choice of whether to use risk assessments to help make detention decisions. These issues are often conflated in the policy convo, which I think is unhelpful.
But if you're interested in the effects of using risk assessments in the pretrial context, you should check out the following:
PSA from a non-econ friend who recently served on an interdisciplinary search cmte: Econs need to step up our game in mentoring our students to write useful diversity statements. 1/n
Their hiring cmte used diversity statements for an initial screen of applicants. Very few econ candidates made it thru. She was completely bewildered by how bad their statements were. 2/n
After hearing how her field (psych) approaches such statements, I see at least 3 issues in econ: (1) We generally advise students not to 'waste' much time on these other statements. All that matters is the JMP and the letters, amirite? 3/n
Greg DeAngelo - an econ prof @CGUnews - has sent letters to several faculty & our employers as retaliation & harassment for supporting an AEA investigation into credible, serious allegations of serial sexual harassment. I'm so over this. #EconTwitter
I'm going to create a separate category on my calendar to keep track of the time I spend fighting bad actors in econ. So much time. Time I don't get to spend on research. The number of hours is going on my annual report next year.
The most strategic bad guys know that wasting people's time is the best way to win. FOIAing emails, sending scary-sounding letters from their lawyer to your chair/provost/GC so that you get called into meetings. Eventually, they figure, you'll cut your losses and give up.
In the meantime, the costs get bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger. And when some junior person comes to me in a year saying they've been harassed by a different bad guy, I think about all that before helping them fight. Do I really want to commit another gazillion hours?
Interested in how to increase police accountability? Check out this fantastic series of interviews and discussion papers by leading research experts, for @Arnold_Ventures.
If I am required to pay undergrad RAs $15/ hour, I will definitely hire fewer of them. Silver lining: less paperwork for me.
Ok enough pot-stirring for now; I'm muting this conversation.
Expand the EITC, folks.
Ok one more thing: If you're worried about college students struggling to make ends meet, the solution is not for professors to become their benefactors. The solution is to raise taxes on those who can afford it (like me) & provide more/better financial aid.