The now infamous S. Nikolaou, Secretary General of Anti-Crime Policy, chose to give an interview - where else? - to a far-right newspaper. Apart from the fact that the "journalist" D. Danikas whitewashes her (as was expected) in the article and apart from the fact >>
that she continues to spread misinformation & slander against the hungerstriker
we want to dwell on a specific point in her *interview*. So she states:
"Nobody wants Koufontinas to die.His life is in his hands.And if there is a danger,it is the duty of the State to rescue him. >>
we want to dwell on a specific point in her *interview*. So she states:
"Nobody wants Koufontinas to die.His life is in his hands.And if there is a danger,it is the duty of the State to rescue him. >>
That is why a prosecutor's order was issued which, addressed to the doctors, says that they should proceed with any medical action, even CONTRARY TO HIS WISHES, in order to save his life. The State is obliged to take care of his salvation. >>
We are obliged by law to make sure he lives. That is why FORCED FEEDING (is an option). There is a case law of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), according to which forced feeding is recommended in order to save the life of the prisoner. >>
In fact, this does not constitute a violation of Article 3 of the Charter of Human Rights."
So she tells us that FORCED FEEDING of the hunger striker has been decided.
ONCE AGAIN we quote the WMA Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikers
wma.net/policies-post/…
So she tells us that FORCED FEEDING of the hunger striker has been decided.
ONCE AGAIN we quote the WMA Declaration of Malta on Hunger Strikers
wma.net/policies-post/…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
