Man. The memories from my four years in seminary at BCS keep trickling back.
On #InternationalWomensDay, let me share this memory with you, as a kind of apology to the women (especially pastor’s wives) who have been taken for granted.
TW: Christian patriarchy.
In one of the later years of my M.Div program at BCS, I took a “Biblical Eldership” class. It wasn’t a hard class, but it did have a rather demanding requirement: that we all attend the Spring “Weekender” retreat at Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington D.C. together.
CHBC holds these retreats twice a year, I believe, and the design is to help pastors and ministers see what congregational life and pastoral leadership should look like, essentially. Retreat-goers get behind-the-scenes snapshots of how this big Baptist church “does church.”
Well, BCS sends every M.Div cohort to these retreats. 15-20 men travel from Minneapolis to D.C. for the better part of a week (“Weekender” is a misnomer.) When I took the eldership class, and as we got details about how long the “Weekender” was, my wife got (justly) indignant.
She and I had a 3yo and a 1yo. I was the main breadwinner, and she had put in the lion’s share of the time at home with the kids, strictly so that I could pursue my rigorous, 4-year M.Div degree. Her thinking was: “If my husband is taking a week of vacation from work...
...it’d better be a real vacation, and I’d better get to go on it, too!” The Weekender failed in both respects. But it was a requirement for my degree! Regardless of how pissed we were about me having to go on this trip and leave her for a week with the kids, we had no options!
So I went.
Long story short, the trip didn’t feel right to me. None of us guys in the M.Div cohort were vocational pastors yet, and much of the Weekender was over our heads, or worse: propaganda from a certain Christian tribe (i.e. Reformed SBC).
What’s more, all of the guys in the cohort were married, and the majority had young kids like my wife and I had. And we *all* left our wives at home so we could—yes, fulfill a degree requirement—but it felt more like a bro’s hangout, a club to play “pastor” and drink beer in D.C.
I engaged what I could at the Weekender and then cut corners to get home ASAP to my family.
I was not happy with the situation. I wasn’t happy how BCS required us to jet away from our families for that extended period of time. It was already a rigorous program for me...
and it had been even harder in almost every respect on my wife. We didn’t need this trip!
I knew I wasn’t alone with my frustrations: other guys in the cohort had felt the same dissonance.
I decided to bring it up to my seminary prof-mentor. I laid out candidly why I thought this was putting an undue burden on families and wives especially, and for such little payoff.
My mentor essentially responded that this trip was something that they’d always done, and that it was “training for when pastors [husbands] would go off with their leadership teams on week-long retreats.”
In other words, the Weekender was intended just as much to train wives to know their place and stay at home as it was intended to “prepare us” as the husbands for the pastoral retreat scene.
I’m ashamed to say that I didn’t see the pathology in that at the moment.
But now I know better.
And I want to say I’m sorry to all the women and families who found themselves on the receiving end of their own “Weekender,” whether that lasted for a week, or two, or for a season of a spouses’s seminary, or for decades of ministry, or for longer.
It’s evil for men to expect to have bro’s getaway time at their wives’s expense.
It’s terribly twisted for a prof, or a seminary, or any institution, to force women into a space that Jesus was constantly calling women out of in order that they’d follow him!
And I am sorry that it took so long for me to see it, and even longer to come out of it.
If it’s any consolation, I’m dedicated now to making those glass ceilings come crashing down.
And with books like “Jesus and John Wayne” by @kkdumez around for awhile now, and #MakingBiblicalWomanhood by @bethallisonbarr coming out in a matter of weeks, I think I hear more glass getting ready to shatter.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How could a professor's lack of emotional intelligence result in suppression and trauma for students in the academic arena? What happens if a whole institution shares this lack of EQ?
Another 🧵 from my experience at @BCS_MN. A case study in two Scenes, with some screenshots.
Scene 1: In April 2020, I turned in what was essentially my capstone paper for seminary. The prompt for the paper was to answer the question, "What does the whole Bible say about _______?" And the fill-in-the-blank could be something related to ecclesiology, i.e., the church.
I wanted to write on the topic of "Women in Ministry." I had been thinking about that topic for +/- two years. The professor pre-approved my topic choice back in February, though he must have known that for a 3500-5000 word paper, I would have to be selective in what I included.
I’ve thought for awhile now that John 9 is a key text for survivors of abuse that occurred in a Christian, or religious, context. There’s insight and there’s encouragement here in this mind-blowing chapter of John’s Gospel.🧵
Jesus performs a miracle—giving sight to a blind man—in verses 1-7, then from verses 8-34, Jesus is conspicuously absent.
In Jesus’s absence, a war of narratives emerges between Pharisees and the blind man:
Either we have a brazen sheep,
or we have blind shepherds.
The Pharisees are always shifting their narrative as the evidence trickles in. First, they doubt that the event happened at all (v. 18). And even when confronted with the evidence, they force the (formerly) blind man to stand on trial as a “sinner” (v 24 is an ANE swearing-in).
He says: If I have so many negative things to say about BCS, why did I go there in the first place? If I don’t like John Piper’s theology, why did I sit under it for four years?
The short answer is that going into seminary I was incredibly naive. 🧵
As a teenager, I found myself wanting more out of God, frankly. The G/god that I’d encountered in my church was authoritarian and tribal. And that left a vacuum in my soul. Then I discovered Piper’s sermons, etc., and I was immediately drawn to the “bigness” of Piper’s vision.
After college, I knew I wanted to go to seminary. I was leaning toward Calvinist theology, and I held vaguely complementarian views from my growing up years. I had gleaned from Piper here and there, and my wife was from MN, and things came together so that I could attend BCS.
In case we’re tempted to think that the “empathy is sin” mindset is a fringe thing for evangelicals, let me connect some dots based on my experience.
I’ve got the names of an individual and an institution for us. John Piper, and Bethlehem College & Seminary. 1/
Let’s start with the institution. I attended @BCS_MN’s M.Div program from 2016-2020. In 2019, yes, I heard BCS’s president-elect Joe Rigney say that “empathy is sin.” But I also heard the same thing from at least one other BCS prof on several occasions, with *no* qualifiers. 2/
Some profs like Rigney were willing to die on that hill. But too, when I raised concerns about this “empathy as sin” doctrine to other BCS profs, they shrugged it off. They neither confirmed, nor denied the sin. But...they were clearly afraid to say that empathy *wasn’t* sin. 3/
I’ve said several things about @BCS_MN recently on Twitter. And yet, I still have so many memories and thoughts. And I’m still processing through some of the hurt.
In one thread, I claimed that BCS has a toxic, “power through fear” culture. 1/
In another, I claimed that the faculty/admins were complicit in this culture (i.e., the problem isn’t an individual; it’s the institution). In this thread, I want to give substance to those claims. 2/
I want to do that by recounting some of my experiences in class with a specific prof, and by underlining how the Deans at BCS responded when I brought these troubling experiences to light. 3/
It’s your weekly sermon-prep live tweet from yours truly! Working through Mt 1-4 leading up to Palm Sun. Mt 2:1-23 this week.
Last wk we summed up the chiasmic 1:1-25 with “Jesus is the King we’ve all been waiting for.”
(Disclaimer: no chiasms in 2:1-23 that I can discern. 🤷🏻♂️)
The main point of 2:1-23 will be “God is getting ready to launch his kingdom through King Jesus.”
Outline?
We see God 1. Proclaim his King (v. 1-12) 2. Protect his King (v. 13-18) 3. Preserve his King (v. 19-24)
Anyone have a better p-word than “preserve” for v. 19-24? 😂
Two scattered insights from the text:
(1) Herod is fearful, then angry, then violent in this story. This is significant. I think we can say that hate often (always?) lies behind violence, and fear often (always?) lies behind that hate.