1. If you want to understand the problem with political debate in the UK, then we only have to look at this government report on the European Union from 2010. (Thread)

CC @commonslibrary
2. The House of Commons Library is strictly impartial, but sometimes (as we shall see) when including opinions, it’s important to take into account more than someone’s job title or experience.
3. The report in question needed to cover the Factortame ruling that asserted the supremacy of Community law in the UK.
4. To get one of their opinions, they refer to a member of the legal team that challenged the legality of the Maastricht treaty.
5. This expert’s opinion is that nobody should be up in arms about it, and to repeat the constitutional position that Community law is UK law that, by decision of our parliament, is supreme.
6. The House of Commons Library then also refer to a member of the legal team for the Metric Martyrs.
7. This expert concludes that, since the subjugation of English common law and parliament to European domination was a principle war aim, it could be interpreted as the reverse of the Second World War.
8. That might interpreted as hyperbole, but it isn't.

In this clip, from the same year as the report, he tells his audience that we are at war with Germany.
9. Not just that we are at war with Germany, but he is willing to share prospective sides and dates of a land war.
10. Apparently, we’ve already negotiated with the Germans how we’re going to split up Germany after we win.

Very sporting of us.
11. And we also learn that Germany was responsible for: The Great Depression, the Spanish Flu, the 1973 Oil Crisis, the Vietnam War, and control the Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, and Communist China.
12. Obviously this "line of thought" didn’t go well when the 2012 Olympics came around, but it also shows that these were his genuinely held beliefs.
13. But this isn’t just some Barrister, he was also the co-Chairman of the Eurosceptic think tank The Bruges group.
He has shared platforms and rubbed shoulders in the Eurosceptic community.
15. The House of Commons Library is not a political rag like the Telegraph, it is objective and thorough, and yet one of its sources for an EU report was on record claiming that the EU was a German plot.
16. In that context, this is a wholly inappropriate comment from a wholly inappropriate source.
17. Right now in the UK, in less discerning forums, people’s opinions are given air time because they are contrary, regardless of the appropriateness of the source or the substance of their argument.
18. This is dangerous and it really has to stop.

/End
Alexander wants me to point out that the House of Commons Library isn't the government. (I will finally get this into my head one day)

And this does not reflect on the overall quality of this report of the House of Commons Library, or any other.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steve Analyst

Steve Analyst Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EmporersNewC

28 Feb
@987_charles @WarRocketAjaxUK I've got footage. What he is describing is pretty much the opposite of keeping sovereignty.
@987_charles @WarRocketAjaxUK Building up a European foreign policy?

Now the problem here is the source of your quote also said that Heath called it a just a Common Market while saying he claimed no loss of sovereignty.
@987_charles @WarRocketAjaxUK And the problem with that is that Heath doesn't call it a Common Market he uses the term Community, and he believes that the surrender of sovereignty is something that should be recognised and made clear. That it was a cost worth paying.
Read 42 tweets
25 Feb
1972 Common Accord
1992 Parliamentary consultation
1994 Parliamentary hearings
1997 Parliamentary approval
2001 Common Accord moves to QMV
2007 Parliamentary election
2014 Spitzenkandidaten

"Impossible to reform" after a "long opposed" 1 term informal agreement was dropped. 🤦‍♂️
The British establishment still pushing out this line, and history still making them look like total pillocks.
From the people who demanded a referendum on the "Reform treaty" so they could vote it down, and with it that parliamentary vote.
Read 4 tweets
12 Feb
OK, I don’t think there is much to jump on about the Amsterdam thing. (Thread)
But I also think that that Andrew Bailey misses the point.
During the referendum the argument was made that because the EU regulatory regime was agreed with the UK that passporting would be granted.
Read 34 tweets
5 Feb
There is absolutely no need for a minority to pressure the supermarkets into buying stock with a short shelf life that won't be sold, John, but all is not lost mate...

...Chris has some really good ideas about solving this problem, and I believe he might even have some big contacts in Oman and Bahrein who are willing to buy tonnes of our stock.

Read 4 tweets
29 Jan
There is actually another way, and I think it's in the contract. It's time for the Commission to work with the memberstates the UK and with AZ in terms of working out how to boost supply.

The AZ contracts can't be filled, arguing over today's supply is just not productive.
Or, we can spend all our time arguing about what we can't fix. Get angry and outraged and maybe plant the seeds of resentment to harvest later on.
I mean... I know people are dying and everything, but why should they be our priority when we can make it all about nationalism?
Read 6 tweets
26 Jan
They EU are asking for early notification and it's for transparency reasons.
And it's not a special British clause.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!