Thread by @True_IslamUK

THE BIZARRE LIES OF @Haqiqatjou EXAMINED

This is a NOT-TO-BE-MISSED amusing, if not hilarious, carnival of errors! You're going to want to be sitting down for this one!

THREAD 👇

https://twitter.com/Haqiqatjou/status/1369012975055630339

"A believer is not stung from the same hole twice" goes the hadith, and Haqiqatjou is proving it true, venturing to lie again, more brazenly, and more foolishly about Hazrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad (as), the Imam Mahdi and Masih.

In this article, Haqiqatjou's "specialist" on Ahmadiyya Islam, Mufti Abdullah Moolla, enters into the fray a second time, after having been roundly debunked by this platform only a few days ago (see tweet below)

https://twitter.com/True_IslamUK/status/1367191792521785349

In this new article, the "Mufti" seeks to "debunk" false prophecies of the Promised Messiah (as). He focusses on two:

1. Prophecy of the death of Lekh Ram
2. Revelation obstensibly stating he would die in Mecca or Medina

However, he doesn't give a full discussion of the prophecy nor the reasons for the prophecy. For a full discussion on it, we refer the reader to the following article:

reviewofreligions.org/12030/a-murder…

1) DEATH OF LEKH RAM

The reason why he prophesied against Lekh Ram was because of the abusive language Lekh Ram was continuously using against the Prophet Muhammad (sa) and his refusal to stop. In fact, Lekh Ram himself requested a prophecy against him:

Enemies of Islam have always hurled abuse at it because it is the best way to avoid serious debate and the easiest way to portray provoked, ordinary Muslims, as barbarous and violent.

The Promised Messiah (as) instead sought a heavenly decree to prove the truth of Muhammad (sa)

This is what @Haqiqatjou and the Mufti are supporting with their article. They lend to support to Lekh Ram who abused the Prophet Muhammad (sa) and his wives rather than the Promised Messiah (as). Their hatred of Ahmad (as) is greater than their love of Muhammad (sa).

Lekh Ram made a prophecy against the Promised Messiah (as) that he would die within three years from Cholera. The Promised Messiah (as) received the following revelations, in response, 1893. The 3rd quote is the Promised Messiah's (as) statement from his book Karamatus Sadiqeen

Thus, we have the following features of the prophecy:

1. Punishment, pain and torment would befall Lekh Ram
3. The punishment would be within 6 YEARS
4. Lekh Ram's death would occur with the day of Eid

This is a HIGHLY specific prophecy! Unfortunately, the Mufti along with @Haqiqatjou don't even do their basic research.

After quoting the passage of the Promised Messiah's (as) words correctly, they then state that the window of the prophecy was 6 months, not six years!

In other words, the Mufti only mentions 1 of the 2 conditions of the prophecy and even gets that wrong! Being unjust, he doesn't even give the other condition relating to the day of Eid! And this is his attempt to "debunk" the Promised Messiah's (as) truth!

So what happened? The Promised Messiah (as) unsurprisingly outlived the prophecy of Lekh Ram that he would die within three years from Cholera.

Lekh Ram however did not outlive the prophecy of the Promised Messiah (as).

In 1897, Muslims of the Punjab celebrated Eid on the 6th March. On that same day, at his home in Wachhu Wali Street, Lekh Ram was murdered while taking a bath by a disciple of his.

Naked, he could not contain his intestines within his abdomen. A violent and pitiful end.

Lekh Ram's body, just as had been prophesied, was burnt (cremated) and his ashes scattered in the sea, just as the calf of Samiri was, just as the prophecy stipulated. All conditions were met:

1. A violent, painful end
2. On the day of Eid
3. Within 6 years (1893-1897)

2) DEATH IN MECCA OR MEDINA?

This is often trotted out but it is false. The Promised Messiah (as) never prophesied that he would literally die in Mecca or Medina. The Promised Messiah (as) explained that the revelation was metaphorical:

Dying in Mecca related to being granted a victory like that of the conquest of Mecca and death in Medina signifies that people's hearts would turn to him.

If anyone doubts this occurred, his enemies should read his book Haqiqatul Wahi, enumerating 250+ fulfilled prophecies of his, while his following swelled to 400,000 in his own lifetime.

alislam.org/book/haqiqatul…

As for those who believe the lie that he died in the toilet in Lahore, one should look to the original sources. They should be fearful of the Hadith:

Just as the Jews sought to defame Isa (as) by claiming he died an accursed death on the cross, so too, Muslims today seek to defame their Messiah by claiming he died an accursed death too. The Prophet (sa) said the Muslims would become like the Jews in all aspects:

The truth is as follows: he died in his bed. Here are eyewitness accounts: Silsila-e-Ahmadiyya, Volume 1 andSeeratul Mahdi, Volume 1, Page 10-11 (Mirza Bashir Ahmad r.a)

In the latter quote, the use of a commode was mentioned. This is normal for the elderly in the dying stages.

The opponents of the Promised Messiah (as) were not present, and all eyewitness accounts state he died in his bed. This accusation therefore is pure falsehood that he died in the toilet. It is evidence only of the falsehood and filthy minds of those who level it.

May God guide the Muslim Ummah to the truth and away from the clutches of such "scholars" who peddle falsehood and lack righteousness. Ameen.

PS. Let's not forget the end of the article, evincing a total lack of research, scholarship or even understanding of Geography.

Apparently Qadian in East Punjab, PAKISTAN...Someone better tell India that Pakistan has taken Qadian!

PPS. One of the points the Mufti makes is that the Promised Messiah (as) paid the assassin of Lekh Ram. This allegation is not new. It was made at the time too!

As a result, the police searched the house of the Promised Messiah (as) and found no such evidence, then...

The Promised Messiah (as) announced that such critics should come forward and swear on oath that he ordered the murder, and if they do not die within 1 yr in a manner outside human intervention, then he himself should be found guilty of murder.

(Ahmad the Guided One, p. 176)

Could a false man ever make such a statement? Never! Only a truthful man could be so daring!