Google has announced a big change to its advertising system. That big change raises 4 big questions. iccl.ie/digital-data/4…
It relies on privacy safeguards such as “trusted servers”, isolating data on the person’s device, and targeting groups of people rather than individuals. However, these safeguards are vaguely described. iccl.ie/digital-data/4…
Google said that it would not use unique identifiers in its own ad products. Even so, competition and self-preferencing questions arise. Google will be exposed to competition complaints and litigation if it leaves any room for doubt on any of these three points.
Big Question 3: Google’s plan will create a new market for a new thing, called "interest groups".
This is potentially valuable for legitimate publishers.
But the devil may be in the detail.
Big Question 4: It will still be possible to discriminate (against minorities, for example) by using targeting on people’s devices.
Despite saying that it will launch this new system in the next few months, Google has published very little detail about it. It is not possible to know whether Google’s new approach will protect privacy, or whether it will advantage Google.
Data protection and competition supervisory authorities must obtain answers from Google. It is essential that it conduct thorough data protection impact assessments, and that the @DPCireland examine this in detail.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Data Protection Authority investigation of our complaints finds that the IAB Transparency and Consent Framework infringes the GDPR. iccl.ie/human-rights/i…
Today, we release new data on the consequences of the biggest data breach of all time: Real-Time Bidding. Two years after my complaint about the RTB privacy crisis, @DPCIreland has failed to end it. @ICCLtweet iccl.ie/human-rights/i…
Here is a list of the companies that Google sends RTB data to in Europe. It is 25 pages long!
(US list is longer, and has companies from many nations) iccl.ie/wp-content/upl…
The online advertising market requires both internal & external #GDPR enforcement. @Brave's new submission to @CMAgovUK shows why we need to act against the vast RTB data breach, but also act against Google's internal data-free-for-all too. brave.com/competition-in…
@brave@CMAgovUK Google, and Facebook, operate internal data free-for-alls that sustain their monopolies. In competition law, that's a problem. But it's also a problem in data protection law - and data protection law happens to have a handy *consumer-led* remedy!
@brave@CMAgovUK@Kartellamt@ICOnews It is tricky, because the vertically integrated platforms can hide behind three layers of infringement. Data protection authorities have to knock down all three. But once they do, the Googles and Facebooks have nowhere to hide.
New report from @brave: people seeking help for addiction, disability, and poverty on council websites are profiled by private companies in the UK. brave.com/ukcouncilrepor…
@brave JavaScript inventor and @brave's CEO @BrendanEich calls on Elizabeth Denham @ICOnews to finally act against RTB and adtech in his foreword.
The CEO of the tracking industry lobby is throwing stones at a publisher group CEO for supporting the GDPR. But oddly, he cites an early research working paper in to an e-commerce (not publisher) revenue impact hit from the #GDPR.
Also, the tracking industry lobby group CEO counts Equifax, Acxiom (as featured in #TheGreatHack), and the rest of the major data brokers as his paying members, plus Facebook and other privacy harming companies.
Unanswered question: Was Cambridge Analytica an @IAB member? Most of Cambridge Analytica’s data sources are current @IAB members, as are other “data management platforms”. @r2rothenberg@alexpropes@jason_kint