Taylor Lorenz is a star reporter with the most influential newspaper in the US, arguably the west. Her work regularly appears on its front page.

Her attempt to claim this level of victimhood is revolting: she should try to find out what real persecution of journalists entails.
If you're going to insinuate yourself into polarizing political debates and report (or pretend to "report") on the powerful, you'll be "attacked" online. It can be extra toxic due to race, gender, sexual orientation, etc but it's still just online insults. That's not persecution.
With all the suffering and deprivation and real persecution in the world, it is utterly astonishing how often coddled, well-paid, highly privileged, coiffed, insulated, protected US elites posture as the world's most oppressed class. It's quite sickening and offensive.
If you want to read about what actual persecution looks like, go check out what the US and UK Governments are doing to Julian Assange, to start with. I can't imagine how much he'd love to trade that for mean tweets about him online.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

10 Mar
Criticizing Public Figures, Including Influential Journalists, is Not Harassment or Abuse

greenwald.substack.com/p/criticizing-…
As social media empowers uncredentialed people to be heard, society's most powerful actors seek to cast themselves as victims and delegitimize all critiques.

It is a majestic reversal of power dynamics, in which the most influential unite to silence everyone else.
Knowing you will be vilified as some kind of brute abuser if you criticize a New York Times reporter is, for many people, too high of a price to pay.

So people instead refrain, stay quiet, and that is the obvious objective of this lowly strategy.

greenwald.substack.com/p/criticizing-…
Read 4 tweets
8 Mar
Brazilian Supreme Court just invalidated the criminal convictions of ex-President Lula da Silva, restoring his political rights and rendering him eligible to run against Bolsonaro in 2022. He was leading all polls when convicted in 2018.
The court ruled the corrupt judge and prosecutors who convicted Lula, @SF_Moro, had no right even to take the case. That was the subject of one of the first articles we published in our exposés:

theintercept.com/2019/06/09/bra…
Deltan e Moro sabiam desde o início que o caso de Lula não cabia em Lava Jato/Curitiba. Mas eles queriam nas mãos de Moro - eles sabiam que ele estava trapaceando e iriam condenar Lula - então eles se envolveram em truques para mantê-lo lá. Nosso primeiro dia de #VazaJato:
Read 14 tweets
8 Mar
VIDEO: With a Second War on Terror Looming, a New Film Explores the Grave Abuses of the First

greenwald.substack.com/p/video-with-a…
Imprisoned without charges for fourteen years in Guantánamo, @MohamedouOuld is a symbol of humans' impulse to abuse power and their capacity for redemption.

The interview I conducted with him on Saturday is one I sincerely hope you will watch. A preview:
Particularly now, with Dems and their neocon allies who spawned the first War on Terror plotting how to launch a second, this time with a domestic focus, it is vital understand how arbitrary power of this kind ends up at least as dangerous as the enemy invoked to justify it.
Read 7 tweets
5 Mar
As the Insurrection Narrative Crumbles, Democrats Cling to it More Desperately Than Ever

greenwald.substack.com/p/as-the-insur…
If the threat of "armed insurrectionists" and "domestic terrorists" is as great as some claim, why do they have to keep lying and peddling crude media fictions about it?

From fire extinguishes to massive Inauguration Day violence to a new March 4 uprising: fake hysteria reigns.
"Threats and dangers are not binary: they either exist or are fully illusory. They reside on a spectrum. To insist that they be discussed rationally, soberly and truthfully is not to deny the existence of the threat itself."

In all cases, dangers are inflated for nefarious ends.
Read 5 tweets
3 Mar
The rotted core of Democratic Party politics: Image
The Biden WH told NYT that they withdrew Neera's nomination because Murkowski "made clear to the White House she would not vote for her."

Murkowski denies any such thing happened, saying the WH never even asker her what she intended to do.

Someone isn't telling the truth. Image
Before the nomination was pulled, @ryangrim made a very good case that people were wrong for saying the WH was fighting harder for Neera than $15/hr minimum wage (I was one of those).

They fought for neither. Seems he was right:

Read 4 tweets
2 Mar
Biden's Protection of Murderous Saudi Despots Shows the Hidden Reality of U.S. Foreign Policy [for subscribers]

greenwald.substack.com/p/bidens-prote…
That the U.S. opposes tyranny is a glaring myth. Yet it is not only believed but often used to justify wars, bombing campaigns, sanctions, and protracted conflict.

The U.S. does not dislike autocratic and repressive governments. It loves them, and it has for decades.
It is in situations like this -- where U.S. actions so glaringly diverge from the propaganda they typically peddle -- that they are forced to tell the truth about their actions. That's why Psaki admitted they do embrace murderous tyrants when "U.S. interests" are served: Image
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!