UK govt sitting on report that it’s replacement for the Erasmus scheme - The Turing Scheme - won’t work as envisaged and will cost vastly more than estimated.
2/
One of the problems highlighted is that as govt only intends to fund UK students this doesn’t create the synergies & goodwill of Erasmus which depends on reciprocity.
Foreign unis won’t have incentive to cooperate - merely to charge UK students/govt as much fees as they can.
3/
Secondly, because of this bureaucratic costs with the UK scheme is likely to be far higher than Erasmus - “like a thousand ad hoc schemes” - with all the hassle & administration deadweight costs associated with such fragmented ventures.
4/
Also the £100 million scheme for 35 000 students is “widely ambitious” as this represents a cost per student of circa £2 600 a student - considering 🇺🇸 🇳🇿&🇨🇦 Unis are the most popular non EU unis among UK students in many cases this would barely cover admin & travel costs.
5/
Given these factors it’s predicted that much less than 35 000 will take up the scheme and may simply build on those unis which already have existing established partnerships anyway.
Also unlikely that poorer students at average unis c/would use scheme.
6/
Recommendations to avoid these problems is to devote significantly more funding....and introduce Erasmus style reciprocity into the Turing system at an “overall level” with specific countries rather than as hoc highly bureaucratic program which would simply eat into budgets.
7/
Concerns also raised around research in that Erasmus can be seen as an “accelerator” for collaborative partnership between unis.
Because the Turing scheme is one sided this “accelerator effect” is likely to be much weaker.
8/
Given these factors it is suggested that the Turing Scheme budget will end up mostly consumed by additional ad hoc bureaucratic costs and as a modest subsidy to well-off students who would have gone to a small number of 🇺🇸& 🇦🇺Unis under existing agreements anyway.
/ends
ADD+1
Thinking about this overnight & with my exp of edu industry..
...it would probably be more efficient to have 3 people in an office simply handing out £2000 cheques to the 1st 50 000 UK students who can provide confirmation a foreign Uni has booked them a 3rd year option.
ADD +2
You’d be putting real money in more students pockets and the admin would be done by the students and unis.
The Turing scheme as of now simply can’t deliver anything remotely tangible to students if majority of expense is simply covering admin.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Talk in Whitehall that the UK govt is planning a “reorganisation” of Civil servants in the Northern Ireland Office as too many are perceived as too “neutralist”.
2/
Recruitment into the Northern Ireland Office was generally handled deliberately in a more sensitive way and with an emphasis on neutrality & a “making things work” attitude and less on unionism.
Biden govt “unnerved” by Boris Johnson’s new “Global Britain” defence plans.
New UK defence review suggests an aggressive move for UK autonomy in Asia and less resources to defend UK’s immediate continental threats such as Russia.
2/
New US administration reported to be perturbed by a UK move that could antagonise China - where UK may not have the power/resources to deal with the consequences and that a move away from common European defence could lead to a more EU autonomous military structure.
3/
Very interesting article on this in today’s @FT as well.
A number of Conservative MPs are reported to have admitted privately that they are “unclear” on Boris Johnson’s actual Brexit negotiating strategy or aims....
...apart from escalating a row with the EU as it “works well with the press”.
2/
While such a strategy as a tactic leaves the UK govt plenty of room for manoeuvre...
...it’s nots really clear this is an efficient way to speed up negotiations or builds up the required levels of trust with the EU to optimise future negotiation outcomes.
3/
Also leaves open the door for misunderstanding on EUs side.
Can the EU be relied upon to treat all UK govt communication & even actions as “principally aimed for domestic consumption”, that should be ignored even as it makes the EUs work more complex & difficult to manage?
There’s a lot of talk about Boris playing Northern Ireland for leverage but UK’s actions are actually aimed at the Irish Republic.
An attempt is being made to degrade Ireland’s position in the EU single market so that the rest of the EU will have to impose checks on Irish goods.
2/
The aim is to get the Irish govt in a weakened position that it will agree to one of the sub-optimal intra-Irish border solutions rather than be effectively forced out of the EU common trade area.
3/
This explains why the reaction from Irish govt was a step higher than previously.
It’s now no longer about Boris feeding some meat to unionists. It’s about ratcheting up the pressure on Ireland.
Not a coincidence this strategy timed exactly after Frost took over from Gove.
Greens on verge of becoming ruling party in one of Germany’s biggest & most important provinces?
2/
The Greens have ruled in coalition and have been a major force in BW for some years..but inching towards 40% is a new chapter this would make them the established “Volkspartei” in BW.
A view in the near future for other countries....?
3/
When I lived in BW in the 90s the greens were already strong but I never ever imagined they could get more votes than the CDU & SPD.....COMBINED.
The “Loyalist Council” of Northern Irish paramilitaries officially withdraws support for the Good Friday Agreement.
This marks the 1st time the paramilitary representatives have publicly withdrawn backing for the peace deal since it was agreed over 2 decades ago.
2/
It is understood that a communication sent to Boris Johnson has confirmed the “loyalist” paramilitaries will withdraw their backing for the Good Friday Agreement until the UK govt ditches or destroys the Northern Irish protocol agreed with the EU last year.
3/
This is a significant ratcheting up of pressure from “loyalists” and follows decision by DUP/loyalist groups to stop construction of all permanent customs infrastructure that could serve Northern Ireland’s trade with the rest of the UK - even tho this required by Brexit deal.