The last line is telling.

THREAD

The @IRLCoDF need to be seen to do something on #Cyber because @IRLDeptDefence offloaded general #CyberDefence responsibility onto @Dept_ECC & @ncsc_gov_ie.

But The National Cyber Security Strategy doesn't cater for defensive & offensive Ops.
So how can the @IRLCoDF build that capability into the @defenceforces as part of it's recommendations?

SPOILER:

It can't all sit with the Communication and Information Services (CIS) Corps.
1st, the @defenceforces needs an Intelligence Corps.

One that has career structures built to develop talent in the field of technical and military Int collection, collation, analysis & effective dissemination.

We need to be capable of making big data driven decisions fast.
Recruitment & onboarding pipelines need to be tailored so that the DF can go to market for the talent that corporate Ireland is already competing for.

Which also means the Intelligence Corps needs to have a Reserve component so it can tap that high end talent at low holding cost
@defenceforces needs more than a cyber security incident response team (CSIRT), it needs ongoing cyber threat analysis integrated into the broader intelligence effort including Operational/ Open Source/Human/ Imagery/ Geospatial/ Signals Intelligence/ PsyOps/ Exploitation Ops etc
Then beyond identifying cyber threats to its networks and systems, the @defenceforces needs the capability to respond with or initiate offensive cyber operations, perhaps even joint operations across branches, or even partner nations.

Which means more organisational changes...
CIS needs to restructure its career pathway too. Currently the pipeline is geared towards creating telecom generalists after a lengthy onboarding period, rather than specialists in preset disciplines.
Meanwhile, @R_Signals are marketing for EW SIGINT operators & Cyber Engineers.
Again, this is where the @dfreserve has the advantage.

It can offer all the attractive aspects of military service, without compromising the earning capacity of civilian specialists.

But this requires @IRLDeptDefence to manage the relationship between the DF and employers.
In conjunction with recruitment pipelines and technical development career frameworks, we need to talk about pay.

People working in the field of cyber security & infra are commanding serious remuneration packages, the DF needs to compete € for €, or make an alternative offer.
Travel, adventure, unique skills & housing is typically what most Western militaries offer.

The life less ordinary

Only, the @IRLDeptDefence don't offer housing. When joining the PDF, you're not guaranteed to end up in the trade you signed up for. Travel & adventure is mixed.
Also add to the fact that cyber isn't as glamourous as the Danger Wing kicking doors in, & jumping out of helicopters.

What is the DF offering in terms of working environments? The Brugha? The Curragh?

Because the Big Tech companies are offering beanbags, Nerf guns and Segways.
So if the DF is only delivering on skills, and not offering only that which a military can in terms of travel, adventure, and housing, then it needs to compete on pay.

Otherwise, we can expect to see that newly acquired set of skills walk out the gate into a firm that will pay.
Beyond technical execution and threat analysis, both the @defenceforces & @IRLDeptDefence will need Cyber specific legal oversight. Especially if an offensive capability is being developed. @IRLCoDF will need to factor that into its structural recommendations.
The Transport Corps will need specialisation in cyber supply chain management.

Military Police will need cyber forensics built into their skills matrix.

Even line units will need to build in information management and cyber hygiene monitors right down to the section level.
After all, it only takes that one guy at the forming up point wearing a knock off "Garmin" watch that he bought from Ali Express to spoil months worth of operational planning, risk the lives of all his comrades and damage Ireland's reputation.
I know the @IRLCoDF have a lot to think about here, hopefully the Public Consultation will bear some fruit, and offer some solutions to the Irish Defence cyber problems.

That said, it can't hurt to have a further chat with @2Cisar on what's achievable, scalable, & sustainable.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Gilbey

Robert Gilbey Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RobGilbey

14 Feb
Irregular warfare has and continues to be a feature of modern conflict.

Should Ireland have an Irregular Reserve as part of an Irish Resistance Operating Concept?

It's not as dramatic as it sounds.

At <0.3% GDP spent on Defence, Ireland can't afford to build a mass of professional part time combat arm Reservists.

The current model of relying on individuals to be professional military standard volunteers has failed.

So if armed volunteers is the policy, how can it work?
Conscription or National Service in Ireland?

Given the discourse around EU Armies, I sincerely doubt that either be acceptable to the public without some existential driver behind it.

Conscription is typically viewed through a 20th century lens.
Read 13 tweets
17 Dec 20
Thread:

"With regard to the RDF, the Commission will consider a wide range of options and will make recommendations to better leverage the capabilities of the RDF in their supports to the PDF and to make service in the RDF a more attractive option."

Let's unpack that.....
Thankfully, the "Abolition of the Reserve" wasn't considered an option in the Terms of Reference as it was in the DoD's 2012 "Value for Money" Review of the RDF.

I would link the source, but the DoD have opted not to host it despite it informing the 2015 White Paper Policy.
The 2012 Steering Committee comprised of Civil & Military (but not a single Reservist) personnel saw no role for the Reserve as the "PDF could meet all day-to-day tasks".

8 years on, & DF capability is limited due to a crippling retention crisis as a result of DoD mismanagement.
Read 30 tweets
26 Nov 20
This is a significant step forward for @dfreserve

"The decision to join or stay in the Reserve should be informed by a more ambitious approach to its role" -@simoncoveney responding to @davidstantontd

Special thanks to @BerryCathal for his proposals for Defence Act amendments
@simoncoveney - "I will be encouraging [The Commission on Defence] to be ambitious & if necessary, quite radical to reflect the future defence & security challenges"

"I think we're in a good space here"

@BerryCathal "What the Minister has proposed has exceeded my expectations"
Solid foundations are being laid for what might well be a very progressive set of recommendations by the Commission on Defence.
Read 11 tweets
1 Nov 20
Thread

The Commission on Defence, Terms of Reference.

We need a force structure that is capable of managing the domains of responsibility that we have. That means listening to military expertise that is driven by a desire for capability, over civil advice that is driven by cost
We must review the fact that 79% of our military is only capable of operating on 9% of the territory that we are responsible for defending.

That's before we get into questions over why we have 9 ships, with only an establishment for 7 crews & only strength for ~5 crews.
Defence is a collective responsibility. So the Irish approach needs not only to be whole of Government, but whole of society.

We want to be a good European & Global actor, therefore we must have the hard conversations about contributing & benefitting from defence investment.
Read 10 tweets
21 Oct 20
Cyber Reserve....
Specialist Reserve....

None of this matters if the framework upon which it is built is insufficient for purpose.

Let's unpack what is currently on offer for aspiring Reservists who meet the criteria of "specialist".
1. You have the skills Defence needs and you want to contribute.

Let's say you are a forensic data analyst with Arabic language skills, working for a multinational.

Straight off the bat, there is not an Intelligence Corps for you to join, but you're sort of a techie, so... CIS.
2. You wait for a recruitment window.

You apply.

You wait.

You are given dates for fitness testing.

You wait.

You pass fitness and go on for medical screening.

You wait.

You pass medical and are processed for security clearance.

You wait.

You're cleared to be attested...
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!