I hate real estate as an investment. Some people call me anti-developer.
One of my best friends is one of the biggest real estate developers in America.
Here's what we candidly discuss in terms of housing affordability and supply, that most will never understand.
<thread> 👇🧵
2/ First, let's talk about developer motivation.
When do developers build rentals? When it's most profitable.
When do developers build homes for sale? When it's most profitable.
It's never because they have a deep desire to build housing. Glad that's out of the way.
3/ How do you determine what will be more profitable?
Rentals are based on the gross yield they receive. Since rents are tied to income growth, it can only grow as fast as an economy.
Now selling a house? That grows as quickly as people can borrow money.
4/ When interest rates fall, it provides leverage for buyers.
If I'm a developer, I can now capture not just your income, but a multiplier created by the additional debt you can take out. All of the risk is also transferred to you.
I would never build a rental here.
5/ When interest rates rise, it removes leverage. Even if your income rises, every basis point mortgage rise, lowers leverage.
... rates rise when the economy is good though. This means your income is going to rise. Just not as fast as you'll lose leverage. A rental it is.
6/ Since the 1990s housing bubble, interest rates have generally fallen.
There's been a few small hikes, but those hikes were brief, except before the Great Recession, when no developer wanted to invest in new housing at all.
7/ This is pretty much why every major city hasn't had much rental inventory built since 1990.
YIMBY groups get gaslighted into milking the government for subsidies, when developers have a hard time selling condos, and try to get subsidies to build rental projects.
8/ They're seeded insane narratives. Blame NIMBYs for stopping rentals for any reason, from class war to racism.
e.g. an academic said the value of homes are rising is due to racist NIMBYs. He didn't disclose he just sold his home for 2x value to foreign investment lobbyists
9/ Anyway, my point is housing affordability is directly tied to interest rates and yields.
That's why apartments are no longer built as well. Why would you take the risk, if you can make more dumping that risk on someone with a shiny new debt approval?
</thread>
bonus: Why are interest rates so perpetually low? Because governments saddled themselves up with debt, and can't afford to pay more.
Like a moron that makes $80k, who just bought their third pre-sale condo, hoping the economy never improves, rates rise, and crush their value.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Canada floods the mortgage market with cheap cash to create tons of homebuyers.
... just ahead of new anti-money laundering rules they were pressured to adopt
... right before beneficial ownership registries become mandatory...
... during a money laundering inquiry. 🧐
2/
On the upside:
- give money launderers warning they won't be able to hide in homes in a few months
- let homebuyers borrow more money during the warning period
- your money laundering expert witness "disappears" during a inquiry
Laundering stats will be nice and low!
3/ I'm not discounting the stars have aligned for incompetence, but this is amazing stuff.
The federal government also disassembled the financial crimes unit in Ontario. We have money for "whatever it takes, for as long as it takes" ... except this
Okay, quick lesson so you'll understand the economy better than politicians.
The velocity of money is the rate at which each dollar travels through the economy, captured in GDP.
A high velocity economy is what benefits the most people, and is the gold standard.
<thread> 🧵👇
2/ In a high velocity economy, every dollar you spend ripples through the economy quickly.
Let's say you go to a restaurant, and buy a sandwich. That $10 (it was a pricey sandwich) goes to the shop, who spends it on at the grocery store, who spends it at a wholesaler, etc..
3/ This is a high velocity transaction. Each dollar you spent had an impact throughout your local economy.
At some point (2000), Western economies got tired of increasing GDP by velocity. Instead, they decided they were going to try to grow it by *credit*
A VC once told me to invest in anything that can be used for *legal* money laundering.
Not to make money from the launderers, but because the launderers will hide activity in businesses, boosting the likelihood of legit businesses hopping on.
Heck of an investment thesis.
2/ It turns out the whole gig economy was a great use case.
Renting a room that goes for $100/night in a hotel for $2,000/night on a short-term rental site doesn't set off any red flags, or capital currency controls.
It also isn't subject to laundering regs. 🤣
3/ Also incredible how simple the operations are.
Person A buys a house, and rents it.
Person B gets people to rent from abroad. Don't show up, just pay.
Person A uses the revenue to secure more assets, and expand operations. Brings a new meaning to ghost hotel.
Doug Ford’s a master at playing the opposition and public.
Everyone’s focused on the idiotic things he says, and are now totally ignoring that he just took control of almost all of the land planning in the province.
Boomers: "You can't cancel $50k in student debt. I paid for my degree!"
It also only took you a summer to pay off your degree, and will take students 10+ years now.
This is also what they're doing with housing.
I say this as someone that paid their tuition (multiple times!) by having an after school, and sometimes before school, job.
What's the point of having advanced education, if they're so loaded with debt they can't take risks at new jobs? Student debt is a drag on growth.
I know some Boomer is going to read this and say, "they can do what you did!"
So many points, but I was one of those giftie nerds. I learn in a very short amount of time. Most people can't, and they shouldn't jeopardize a whole degree to reduce debt.