Six years ago, I visited the PhD department that I’ll graduate from this summer. In light of that, here is a thread on Visiting R1 Departments When You Did Not Attend an R1 for Undergrad. 1/
First and foremost: you will meet a lot of fellow prospective students from R1s. That world is so different, & the training they received, the skills they already have, & the knowledge they’ve picked up about academia might feel intimidating to you. It definitely did to me! 2/
(It also might not: undergrad experiences vary so widely, even within specific “tiers” of institutions, and nothing is wrong with you if you are not intimidated. I am simply sharing my experience in case it helps to normalize feeling a bit out of your depth.) 3/
It is important to know that time at an R1 helps *only on the margins*. No undergrad experience magically teaches you the interpersonal & soft skills you'll need to survive 5+ years of socialization into a very weird profession. Most people are starting from (almost) scratch. 4/
So you don’t have a ton of research experience. That’s fine! Grad school is there to *teach you how to do research,* and faculty wouldn’t have admitted you if they don’t think you have the ability to learn. You deserve to be at your visit as much as the R1 students. 5/
So your undergrad experience didn’t teach you a ton about the *discipline* of whatever and how to speak academic-ese and so on. That’s fine! You can learn that stuff, & those who lean into it immediately are (probably) posturing & (definitely) obnoxious. 6/
An aside: if you're a faculty member reading this & your reaction is, wait, prospective students feel like they don’t belong? Yes! Not all of them, but gosh, I felt so out of place at some of the institutions I visited. It was my first time at an R1. Everything was so strange. 7/
Be supportive and stop assuming knowledge. Learn about the varieties of undergrad experiences people have had, and explain how your institution & discipline works. And don’t ask “so you know what the good journals are, right” or “you know the literature, right.” End aside. 8/
Back to prospective students! Here are some Qs you might not know to ask if you didn’t go to an R1. 9/
What kind of support is there for grad TAs? Does the department/university train them? Is training mandatory, optional, encouraged? (tl;dr: There may not be *any* training. This is not abnormal in some disciplines but was shocking to me coming from a SLAC.) 10/
How do grads spend their time when not working? Or, phrased a different way: why is [X] a good place to live? (tl;dr: You want to be in a department where grads are more, & encouraged to be more, than research robots. This is so crucial for mental health.) 11/
What is the community like in this department? Do people in different subfields get along? Are grads friends? (tl;dr: The sorts of community & supportive relationships you might be used don't necessarily exist at R1s; the culture is different. Don’t assume!) 12/
Are there cross-dept opportunities for collaboration? Do grads take classes in other depts? Do they *know* grads in other depts? Are there interdisciplinary workshops? (tl;dr: If this matters to you, depts at many R1s are very isolated. Cross-dept work may be v. difficult.) 13/
Last, if activism & service matter to you: are grads involved in dept & uni-wide service? This may not be the norm! Ask grads what the dept attitude is toward student activism. It may be more hostile than you’re used to! If grads are confused by these Qs, that’s also a sign. 14/
BEST OF LUCK to all of you. You’ve already achieved the hardest part: getting into a PhD program. You have nothing left to prove, and it’s now up to programs to woo you. ENJOY, trust your intuition, and ask questions if you have them! /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
So the Biden admin released its Interim National Security Strategic Guidance, which de-prioritizes international counterterrorism in favor of great power balancing and statecraft.
Here is a Saturday night thread on why those are actually not separate things. 1/
What this thread is NOT: an argument for expanding the counterterrorism umbrella to include yet more policy areas. It is, however, a plea to observe how the 20+ yrs of "war on terror" discourse have exacerbated problems & expanded the idea of terror whether we like it or not. 2/
Let’s take an example: China. From a statecraft perspective, China is a major strategic concern for the US. If you believe human rights need to at least in part govern U.S.–China relations, however, then counterterrorism has to become part of the equation. 3/
The "black militant" mentioned here as taking refuge in Cuba is Assata Shakur. In 2013, she became the first woman on the FBI's Most Wanted Terrorists list. It is not a coincidence that she is also Black, nor that this happened almost 40 years after her alleged crime. 1/
Shakur was a member of the Black Liberation Army (BLA), a Black Panther splinter group. She was found guilty of killing a state trooper in 1977, though the facts of the case are disputed. This NPR interview is a decent overview. 2/ npr.org/2013/05/07/181…
Throughout the 1980s and 90s, the FBI & other national security bureaucracies did a lot of work to write the BLA, Black Panthers, & other groups into the emerging narrative that identified violence by people of color, particularly Black people, as terrorism. 3/
I study white supremacy in institutions and the perpetuation of white supremacist violence. Here is a thread of terms other white scholars have suggested I use instead of white supremacy. 1/
White entitlement: "Do we really have to use the term 'white supremacy'? Is that merited?" If we don't use it to describe *actual white supremacist violence*, then what are we doing? 2/
Racism: That's not off-base, but it's a consequence of the system, not the system itself, friends. Next. 3/
I went to an #APSA2020 panel on applying for jobs at teaching-oriented institutions—something many R1 grads want but that R1 faculty aren't always equipped to advise them on. Here's a thread with what I learned: 1/
1. Apps for teaching institutions need to look different from apps at R1s. You need to center teaching in your cover letter & CV—don't bury either. Def. don't put teaching at the end of your cover letter like you might for an R1. 2/
2. Teaching institutions know they are often not R1 applicants' 1st choice. If they *are* your first choice, you need to drive that home. Research the institution & explain why you want to work *there* specifically. 3/
I've been moving furniture & subsisting off of applesauce all day, so join me in my delirium & let's talk about how New Zealand designates terrorist organizations, shall we?
(No really, this tells us a lot about counterterrorism, secrecy, & state power.) 1/
Much like the US, NZ maintains a list of organizations legally designated as "terrorist." It is a criminal activity to provide material support to or try to join these orgs. Unlike the US, NZ views its list as an obligation under UNSC resolutions. 2/
UNSC 1267/1989/2253 oblige member states to take action against al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, and their affiliates. Worth noting the US designates these entities separately. Other entities that default to UNSC resolutions include the EU and India. 3/
I'm a first-generation graduate student. Here is a thread of things I didn't know when I started my program. 1/
I didn't know that citing your undergraduate thesis was a bad idea and would get you ridiculed in a department workshop. I thought I was signaling experience and skill development. 2/
I didn't know how specialized academia is and that there would be no expectation to take core courses in all subfields of my discipline or to know anything about subfields other than my own. I assumed the opposite in a seminar discussion & got an "oh honey" look from the prof. 3/