Apologies for not responding sooner with specifics to @bigfatsurprise@ProfTimNoakes with specifics.
Here are some......
Fundamental flaw
Yes, RCT’s are design w/ highest causal inference
But many topics can’t be studied w/ RCT
Can’t randomly assign & follow until morbidity/mortality:
*Cigarettes & lung cancer
*Parachutes when sky diving
*Vegan/Vegetarian
Lack of RCT does not = lack of evidence
Claim about review of nutritional epi findings-“0% [to 20%] confirmed in clinical trials”
Refuted?
Or not conducted?
There are very few RCT nutrition trials w/ hard outcomes
Most are done with supplements, not foods
Not surprising that few are “confirmed” if few are “conducted”