One of the challenges I feel is to figure out what I believe on investing in my veins i.e. to what extent my portfolio is basically just the product of what has worked in the last few years vs what my investing philosophy truly is.
2/7 Once you read a few investing books and/or work in the investment management industry, you have a decent idea what people want to hear.
Yes, the Overton window can evolve in terms of what is acceptable or what people want to hear, but we rarely push the window.
3/7 I suspect most young investors, including me (in early 30s), who basically never experienced any sustained recession cultivate an investing philosophy that is derived from mimetic desire and involves a lot of self-deception.
4/7 We are enamored by technology stocks and we never want to sell them. We love compounders which we feel are perennially misunderstood.
But what happens when these truisms don’t work in the market for 5 years? 10 years?
5/7 How many of us will continue to believe what we believe today about ourselves as investors?
Of course, there is another tension about sticking to your philosophy vs having a Bayesian mindset and be willing to evolve as an investor.
6/7 It is perhaps impossible not to feel like a genius in a bull market.
Whether we indeed are and what our philosophy is perhaps going to be revealed when our portfolio goes down by 40-50%.
7/7 We will have a much better idea what we believe in when we experience that, especially if it takes years to get back to even.
Till then, this deep sense of discomfort from not knowing who I am as an investor will probably persist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Read the image attached here. It's about how Costco was consistently criticized by Wall Street analysts 15 years ago because they took "too much care" of the employees.
2/ So what happened in the last 15 years? Costco was one of the few retailers in America that wasn't beaten to death in the age of Amazon.
It was almost 15x in the last 15 years.
3/ While capitalism does create tension among different stakeholders (shareholders, customers, employees, regulators etc), in many cases what is good for broader stakeholders is usually good for shareholders too.
1/ Six months ago, I launched MBI Deep Dives. I publish one deep dive of a publicly listed company every month for $10/month or $100/yr.
Subscribers receive only one/two email each month, and each deep dive is ~8-10k worded piece.
Here's how it went. A thread.
2/ After 6 months, I have 589 paid subs. Although I started in September last year, I started monetizing from November 15, 2020.
I am glad with how things have gone so far, but of course, what happens after 60 months is much more important than 6 months.
3/ I will be the first to admit that MBI Deep Dives has been greatly benefited by the bull market.
I have no clue what will happen to stock price in 3-6 months, but price action probably played a role in convincing at least some to subscribe to my work.
"we roughly achieved our 2023 aspirations in 2020"
Etsy grew 2.5x as fast as e-commerce, and it is now 4th largest e-commerce site by monthly visit.
3/ Etsy is not just an US story now; the pace of international growth and domestic GMS in those markets highlight not only cross-border network effects in play, but also Etsy itself has become a potent international brand.
I wrote a deep dive on Copart this month. I love the company and management (you'll see why in these notes), but less of a fan of the industry and valuation.
Here are my notes.
2/8 For the second consecutive quarter, volume is down 13%, but offset by ASPs which is up by +35%, significantly outpacing overall industry.
Dealer business +10% when overall industry was down
3/8 Revenue +7.3%
Gross margin +49.8%, up 160 bps
Operating margin improved by ~500 bps
Capex for the quarter $136.1 Mn, 85% of which is growth capex