Justice AM Khanwilkar led bench of #SupremeCourt to hear a plea filed by Zakia Jafri, the widow of deceased @INCIndia MP Ehsan Jafri, against the Special Investigation Team (SIT)’s clean chit to the then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi in the 2002 #GodhraRiots@narendramodi
The matter was being heard through video conferencing so far and will be taken up through physical hearing today considering the voluminous proceedings.
#SupremeCourt judge Justice NV Ramana will shortly inaugurate the #COVID19 vaccination program tomorrow at 9.45 am Delhi Govt Health Centre in Supreme Court premises. Vaccination will be for SC Bar Association members and their family above 60 years of age.
President of SCBA, Senior Advocate Vikas Singh and Honorary Secretary, Advocate Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad to welcome Justice Ramana.
5-judge Constitution bench of #SupremeCourt to hear challenge to Maharashtra State Reservation for Socially and Educationally Backward Classes Act for providing educational and employment reservation to Marathas. Senior Adv Shyam Divan to continue arguments #MarathaReservation
Senior Advocate Arvind Datar had concluded his submissions yesterday.
- 6 commissions have found that Marathas are not backward
- Gaikwad commission report favouring Maratha quota is faulty
- Indra Sawhney case lays down the law (50% limit on reservations)
- No reason for reservations in PG medical admissions
#ParliamentQuestion - Government has no plans, as on date, to introduce diaspora Bonds to create an avenue for the Indian diaspora to invest in India, says Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to a question posed by Meenakshi @M_Lekhi
#ParliamentQuestion - Sahara Investor Scam
*MCA has received 17,000 investor complaints for non payment
*2.77 crore policies affected by the Sahara Q Shop scheme across 26 states
#BombayHighCourt is hearing the plea filed by activist Sharjeel Usmani challenging the FIR registered against him accusing him of making hateful speeches in the Elgar Parishad event of 2021. #elgarparishadcase
Sr Adv Mihir Desai appearing for Usmani submits that the issue pertains to the speech made by Usmani in the meeting in Pune according to first informant the speech in violation of 153-A.
Desai: There is no dispute that the speech was made. But the question is whether it comes under Section 153-A.