MegaAnon was the most successful LARPer on 4chan when Q came around.

To be clear, I don't think she was Q. There are a TON of differences between them. But her basic story -- at least, the story she was telling a few days before Q popped into being -- was AWFULLY familiar. 1/12
If I had to choose one post from her oeuvre to show what her deal was (and I do, or this would be a million-tweet thread), this would be it.

In this post, Trump is a 5D chessmaster who knows *everything* about the swamp & his staff. And he has a plan. 2/

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/146…
I encourage you to read that post closely -- it hits a *ton* of the same notes Q went on to hit starting a few days later.

Like Q, MegaAnon's theories, too, were spun off from Pizzagate -- they centered on child sex abuse & claimed that Trump was saving kids from the swamp. 3/
In this post, *one day* before Q's debut, she writes: "So you missed the 2 busts last week alone with more than 400 adults arrested in Myrtle Beach and FL and 200+ kids as young as 3 months saved?"

An anon replies: 4/

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/146…
So why did I say she's NOT Q?

Well, partly there are a TON of differences between them, starting with prose style. But also: oh boy, they had a... complicated relationship, folks. At first she was basically cool with Q, and even gave "Q brah" (she said "brah" a LOT) a 👍. 5/
Here's the post in question, where she writes that "QAnon is breaking down a ton of detail in a more /pol/-friendly format" than she'd ever managed, and "doing a fantastic job." 6/

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/147…
But that was from November 4, 2017. It was early days for Q, and while Q was a VERY big deal, she clearly felt there was still enough oxygen on /pol/ for both of 'em.

But things changed. By the 22nd she claimed that "no Q after 10/31 is legitimate." 7/
archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/150…
A few days after THAT, she was using one of a long-term LARPer's best tricks:

she went into the back catalogue, dusted off some posts, and built a mythology around them. 8/

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/150…
"Remember when I reminded y’all 2 months ago, about... a few young, heinously ignorant and tragically unprofessional, Obama holdover staffers?

I told y'all that for a reason and like I said, it would be conveniently important, later." (This refers to the 10/23/17 post above.) 9/
"So, to the "Q's" (because there's more than one)...

Hey Kids! Did you have fun? We know who you are and you're about to find yourselves, in the same boat as your other comms friends."

A few days after THAT, you know who she pinned Q on? 3 guesses. 10/

archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/151…
If your three guesses were "SOROS ANTIFA OBAMA," *all three are right*. Come on down!

Specifically, Mega's claim is that Obama-administration holdovers with ties to DC-area Antifa (which was funded by Soros) did a big QAnon. 11/
Folks, you know how Q people say 1/6 was an Antifa false flag?

Mega Anon, in friggin' 2017, was saying that QAnon *itself* was an Antifa false flag.

TIME IS MEANINGLESS. SO IS MY LIFE. EVERYTHING'S A FALSE FLAG, A BOTTOMLESS PIT OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES. THIS IS WHAT I'VE BECOME:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Q Origins Project

The Q Origins Project Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @QOrigins

15 Mar
This article is a good reminder that most QAnon conversation really IS driven by a small number of influencers. We don't just focus on them for convenience.

On Q-focused subreddits, for instance, 80% of the content came from 5% of users (see p. 10 below).
arxiv.org/pdf/2101.08750…
Of course, those 5% weren't all influencers. Many were more what you'd call superfans.

But the point is that *it's not hard to tell* who the most devoted spreaders-of-lies are on any given platform. Platforms COULD bring the banhammer down on them & leave the consumers alone.
But they don't, in general.

And I don't understand why.

I get being reluctant to ban LOTS of folks en masse, but I don't understand their reluctance to just... go after the relatively small number of superspreaders, and keep going after 'em on their ban evasion accounts.
Read 4 tweets
14 Mar
This is an INCREDIBLE find by @SethDaire.

Not only does it resolve (IMO) The Mystery of Drop 35™, but it has -- in one stroke -- forced me to change my opinion of whether Q was an evangelical: I now think it's unlikely.

How'd I get all that from just 👇? Come find out! 1/10
So, the mystery of drop 35 is: in the excerpt below, Q mashes together two famous verses (John 3:16 and a selection from 1 Corinthians 13) in a way that's COMPLETELY alien to how Christians use the Bible.

Why?

And Seth proposes an answer: because Q saw it on Bible Gateway. 2/
Now, that seems weirdly specific. How likely is it that Q even WENT to Bible Gateway?

Turns out it's *very* likely.

See, BG is the most popular site out there for Biblical text lookup (it's a top-1000 site OVERALL, per Alexa). Its only serious competition is Bible Hub. 3/
Read 13 tweets
13 Mar
Longtime readers will know that I'm not ridin' the "QAnon is Russia!" train -- but I like and respect @Dragnet_News, who IS riding the train but is a tenacious & knowledgeable passenger.

One part of this article is especially interesting.

dragnetnews.com/2021/03/12/who…
The article notes that Your News Wire (a fake news site described by an EU body as a "Russian proxy") made a claim that dovetailed VERY nicely with Q's predictions: it said that John Podesta was arrested on November 4, 2017 -- just like Q had claimed.

salon.com/2017/11/19/the…
This is indeed interesting!

What Dragnet News *doesn't* mention, but IMO probably should have, is that Your News Wire wasn't the only fake news site to publish that story on November 5.

A British site called Neon Nettle ran the same story...

snopes.com/fact-check/has…
Read 7 tweets
13 Mar
Q Telegram update: still bloodthirsty; fascist; deluded
Further update: also a little impatient
AND just weirdly obsessed with “proving” that world leaders are secretly the child of (INSERT VILLAIN HERE).

The classic case is, of course, claiming that Merkel is Hitler’s daughter; but here, the anon claims Justin Trudeau is Fidel Castro's son 🤷‍♂️
Read 4 tweets
12 Mar
Have these fuckers learned nothing from the "Antifa civil war" they expected on 11/4/17?

And all the OTHER claims of civil war and CoMMuNiSt iNSuRgEncY the right wing has fallen for *since* then?

... Oh, right! They've learned that the claims keep believers riled up.
And SINCE the claims work when there's a deadline attached, why not just... extend the LARP indefinitely?

"Guys, we're gonna need to fight through an Antifa roadblock soon."

"Uh... when?"

"Ssssomeday? Like. Probably soon. Anyway let's LARP about how to do it."

"... sure!"
Yesterday I talked about how QAnon spread in part because it's a shared world-building project -- collaborating with friends to build a fantasy world is fun and creative.

@nickmartin is MUCH better placed than I am to say if the people engaging w/*this* fantasy are having fun.
Read 4 tweets
11 Mar
IMO we don't spend enough time talking about how Q's followers -- a whole lot of 'em, anyway -- straight-up take orders from Q.

Consider Jenn here: Q talked about making QAnon more mainstream, so she did interviews.

Or consider the "digital camouflage" drop, or the Oath, etc.
We REALLY dodged a bullet when Q more or less stopped posting after November 3rd.

How bad would it have been if Q *had* posted something like "Storm (insert city here)'s ballot counting operation to save the state for Trump?"

I'm guessing... bad. Very, very bad.
So why *didn't* Q do it?

If Q really is, as some people have speculated, a foreign "psyop" aimed at sowing division in US society,

A) why not *use it* operationally to plunge us into a terrible constitutional crisis?

and

B) why abandon it at all?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!