BREAKING: Along with @LACANetwork@BLMLA and 39 other community groups, we just sent City Council a letter about the new City Council report on LAPD's violence last summer. The report is a bold attempt to win LAPD more resources and spy powers. drive.google.com/file/d/1MCQIgu…
As we wrote in @KNOCKdotLA today: “It should surprise no one that this investigation, featuring almost zero effort to hear from the community, offers nothing but calls to expand policing. It’s hard to see this review as anything but a police coup.” knock-la.com/lapd-report-pr…
This report was written by a team of six LAPD veterans and insiders after interviewing 100+ police (and exactly 10 community members, all handpicked by City Council).
What does their police-fed investigation conclude? They say LAPD needs more resources and surveillance powers.
The first and biggest proposal in the report is the creation of a permanent new LAPD intelligence bureau devoted to "Public Order Policing" and armed with surveillance tools to monitor potential threats to public order. This is shockingly dangerous.
The proposal for a new Public Order Policing bureau is a barely masked attempt to revive the notorious and racist Public Disorder Intelligence Division (PDID), which was created in reaction to the Watts Rebellion.
PDID targeted everyone LAPD viewed as a threat, with agents infiltrating hundreds of community groups, keeping secret dossiers on activists, and supplying right-wing groups with secret intelligence.
LAPD has always used its spy powers to target Black and brown communities and repress those who criticize police. If an entire LAPD bureau is sitting around waiting for threats to “public order” while armed with tools to monitor political activity, we all know what they’ll do.
Blame for this disastrous report must go to City Council, which moved on June 8 – within barely a week of historic demonstrations against police violence, lies, and impunity – to appoint an LAPD insider to “examine” the police response. What did they think would happen?
There’s a long history of LAPD brutally attacking us and then asking to expand police resources as a response rather than listen to the community’s demands. We saw this after the Watts rebellion, we saw it in 1992, and we saw it after the Ferguson uprising.
The city now faces a chance to break from that "reform" cycle, to learn from this history and do something different. Now is the time to reduce LAPD’s power and resources, not increase them. Defund and abolish the police!
Three months ago @lapdcommission removed this disclaimer from of its motions accepting @LAPoliceFdtn gifts: "To the best of our knowledge, there are no potential factors that may give the appearance of a conflict of interest in accepting this donation."
These gifts are how LAPD gets hooked on dangerous weapons that they use on the community. In 2002, @CommissBratton had @LAPoliceFdtn ask @Target (yes Target) for $200k to buy @PalantirTech for LAPD.
Once hooked on Palantir, LAPD went on to spend millions of tax $$ on it.
Two law professors just wrote this LA Times op-ed proposing various police reforms.
Who asked for these? This is another example of reform professionals offering prescriptions to strengthen policing with no accountability to those who will be harmed. latimes.com/opinion/story/…
The first author is @barryfriedman1. What base is he accountable to?
His sole link to LA that we're aware of is @LAPoliceFdtn paying him $18,000 to help sanitize and legitimize LAPD's body cam surveillance. You would think an op-ed about policing might mention this payment.
The op-ed’s main proposal is legislation standardizing police use of force, probably the ALI model bill @barryfriedman1 wrote.
Well, California two years ago enacted a bill that ALI claims is based on this model. Police here then killed more people in 2020 than 2019 and 2018.
Over the past decade "artificial intelligence" has emerged as a new branding for mass surveillance in response to the scrutiny of the Snowden disclosures, explains @yardenkatz.
Until we dismantle the carceral state, research naming the intersectional biases of AI will just help carceral tools more powerful.
Face recognition AI might be bad at identifying Black women, but do we really want police facial recognition to do that better?
THREAD: You might have heard LAPD claim that their budget was cut by $150 million this summer. That’s a lie. They’re playing games with numbers. We're here to demystify and defund LAPD's budget, which is billions of dollars spent to stalk and brutalize our people.
LAPD got $1.733 billion in 2019-2020 and $1.721 for 2020-21. That means their funding was reduced by only $12 million. The $150 million number that police keep throwing around is the difference from their budget REQUEST (always a high number), not from any actual city budget.
Let’s use an analogy. Suppose LAPD requested $120 last year and we gave them $100. Then suppose they requested $120 again and we gave them $95. That’s a $5 reduction, but LAPD wants to call it a $25 reduction. That’s what their $150 million number is like.
Thread (3 of 7)
July 2018 @lapdcommission holds first ever public hearing on Data Driven Policing – Community shows up in force and demands the dismantlement of LASER & Predpol and demands audit: latimes.com/local/lanow/la…