It’s never easy to have a paper rejected after going through #PeerReview. In this thread we offer some advice to help you move on and move up. 👆😀

#AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter #ecrchat #phdlife Image
Your paper was rejected? Sorry to hear that! It’s certainly not the outcome you expected after putting in so much time and energy. It’s common and totally normal to feel a range of negative emotions.

😢☹️😡😲🤯😭🤨
It’s important to deal with these emotions first. Step away from the paper for a little while. Work on a different project. Vent to a trusted colleague. Do something that makes you happy - go for a swim, watch BBC comedies, eat ice cream (at least that’s what I do).
It may help you to know that rejections are VERY common, but unfortunately “the unabashedly messy aspects of the research process are often hidden” (Clark et al., 2007).

👉The messy process of research: dilemmas, process, and critique files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ842…
Fortunately, scholars are being more and more open about the setbacks and failures that occur behind the scenes. For example, check out this awesome ‘wall of rejections’,

nickhop.wordpress.com/2017/06/21/my-…
and this amazing skirt made from (just some of) the rejection letters received during doctoral candidature.

washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2019…
And did you know… “papers published after having first been rejected elsewhere receive significantly more citations on average than ones accepted on first submission”. So that's a bonus!

nature.com/news/rejection…
As much as it can sting, it’s helpful if we try to reframe rejection within the publishing journey not as a dead-end, but as a stop along the way - a chance to refuel and make some improvements, before moving forward again.
A lovely example of reframing rejection in peer review

But eventually we do need to get back to our paper. Set aside some time and look through each of the comments just as you would for major revisions. Think about what suggestions would improve the paper, and for others, what's your rebuttal?
Consider the reviewer’s perspective. They may have strong knowledge of the topic (or not), or they may have misconceptions that need addressing. A reviewer is also a potential reader, so their comments bring insights into how others may view your work.
Unfortunately, some comments can be rude, aggressive, irrelevant. These comments shouldn’t even be forwarded to you, but remember that they say nothing about you or your paper; they only tell us about the reviewer, and can be put in the🗑️

doi.org/10.1007/s00264…
Before you start making any changes, it’s important to first decide your next journal. After all, a review is conducted for a particular journal. Some comments may become less relevant.
Many publishers have online resources to help with journal selection, and there may be blog posts or papers that list and evaluate journals for your discipline. However, I often start with the reference list, if there are journals that I've cited often, that's a good sign.
Once you have decided on a new journal, start making the changes you feel are needed to strengthen the paper. You might run more analyses, you might add more literature, you might reorganise your discussion.
Whatever you do, don’t send your paper without making any changes at all - its a small world and you may get the same reviewer!
As you are preparing your paper, keep in mind the audience, tone, and style of the new journal. The main reason for desk reject is lack of ‘journal fit', so invest some time in making sure your paper fits (and that you show this clearly and explicitly)

doi.org/10.1002/rcm.77…
Once you submit the new and improved paper, it’s time to play the waiting game again. Hopefully there will be a more positive outcome this time, but if not, we just continue the cycle again. and again. and again.

(My record is 6).
Finally, not if, but when your paper is published, celebrate your success! Share it widely and proudly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scholarly Peer Review

Scholarly Peer Review Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!